Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Please be careful everyone

Was gonna write a whole load of details and information about it but my blood boils every time

My mum is not young and she is not well in the first place , and this has resulted in my mum having a stroke and being in hospital she is now Not the same person

I will prob come by tomorrow and give more details about the actual incident

Promise if I find the person I?m guaranteed to get a life sentence

MAIN THING IM HERE IS TO TELL EVERY ELDERLY LADY AND WOMAN DISTRACTED WALKING WITH THERE CHILDREN TO PLEASE WATCH OUT NO JOKE HONESTLY THIS CRAP HAS ALMOST TOOK MY MUMS LIFE!!

Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the purpose of this thread as no further was given. I beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt have included it. I feel there is racist tone in this thread.

ollieloudon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the

> title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the

> purpose of this thread as no further was given. I

> beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt

> have included it. I feel there is racist tone in

> this thread.


I disagree. I think someone is entitled to pass on the details/description of someone who has attacked their mother. I suspect that those are all the details that his mother has which he is passing on (although it would probably be more useful to know where, geographically, this took place). I'd expect the same to be passed on if they were white.


Hope your mum recovers soon Peckhamguy.

ollieloudon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the

> purpose of this thread as no further was given. I beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt

> have included it. I feel there is racist tone in this thread.


Interesting that you don't object to the identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist of you.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Interesting that you don't object to the

> identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist

> of you.


There has to be some form of identifying noun and the baseline ones are girl/boy/woman/man. Throwing in "black" for no reason that I can see does look rather odd. Sure the OP was just writing quickly when upset and did not have any racist intentions, but it does look odd, just as it would if it said "tall man," "short woman" or whatever. Given the number of black people living in this area I don't think the argument that it in any way helps identify the perpetrator holds any water.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > Interesting that you don't object to the

> > identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist

> > of you.

>

> There has to be some form of identifying noun and

> the baseline ones are girl/boy/woman/man.


Really? They could have used 'person', which is the real baseline.


But that is irrelevant to my point. I just found it interesting that ollieloudon saw one piece of supposed discrimination in the OP's description, but not the other. I thought it said a lot about ollieloudon specifically and what some sections of society see as 'acceptable' discrimination in general.

El Presidente Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We have actually reached the point where in the

> eyes of some, accurately describing an individuals

> appearance is racist.


To be fair, a few years ago on here it was pretty immediate. At least this one took over a week before it descended into that sort of crap.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Yes , me too, but you can always rely on

> rendelharris to do the libtard thing...


Ugh, please don't use that Americanism. 'Liberal' and 'left-wing' are very different (though not completely mutually exclusive)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think the only way to sort this is to ban loud fireworks for private sale (and preferably ban fireworks altogether except for public displays). I don't know whether that has implications I'm not aware of eg I have no idea how many people are involved in firework manufacture.
    • Very happy to recommend Tommy Rooney's excellent work again. He's been servicing my boiler for years now, but this time he swiftly fixed a leaky radiator valve. I put out a call on Friday and it was repaired - and improved - by Monday evening. I asked him if he had an opinion about my other radiators, and he reassured me as he pointed out the leaky bathroom rad was a non-standard length, which was why it caused problems. There followed a brief but detailed history of improvements in regulations for valves and fittings over the years, so that I could understand precisely what the issue was. How many plumbers will do that for you? "I've just got a memory for weird things," says Tommy modestly.
    • Wanted 2 x Adult and 1 x Children tickets for Dulwich fireworks tonight please!
    • Labour have changed a number of things overnight.   1. VAT on school fees - this has resulted in 25,000 moving until state education. 2. Increasing NICs adding billions to the cost of going to work. 3. Introducing the Employment Rights Bill causing employers to stop hiring. This and item 2 have added 100,000 people to the unemployment scrapheap. These are also causing businesses to relocate further harming the economy. 4. Scrapping all the small boats deterrents meaning 60,000 illegal migrants have arrived in small boats since they were elected. 5. Dishing out huge public sector payroses with no conditions so we have a massively increased payroll and doctors etc arestill going out on strike. 6.changed IHT and non domicile tax rules causing 16,500 millionaires to leave the UK and stop paying any tax here at all forever. 7. Alongside 6, leaving the budget up until an historically late period after the last budget has caused a house price crash, killing the market and decimating government stamp duty receipts. 8. Their profligate borrowing (£100bn extra in just one year) to fund all their lavish promises means the government can now only borrow at the highest ever yields on records. They are more beholden to the bond markets than Liz Truss was. 9. The rate of inflation has doubled under this government. It was a healthy 2% when they came in. For most of the last year, as a result of all of the above it is now nearly 4%.   These are all decisions the Labour government took that have immediate cause and effect.  Its no good harking back to 15 years ago. The current administration was gifted the fastest growing economy in the G7 and within 15 months they have destroyed it.    And things are only going to get worse this winter.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...