Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Please be careful everyone

Was gonna write a whole load of details and information about it but my blood boils every time

My mum is not young and she is not well in the first place , and this has resulted in my mum having a stroke and being in hospital she is now Not the same person

I will prob come by tomorrow and give more details about the actual incident

Promise if I find the person I?m guaranteed to get a life sentence

MAIN THING IM HERE IS TO TELL EVERY ELDERLY LADY AND WOMAN DISTRACTED WALKING WITH THERE CHILDREN TO PLEASE WATCH OUT NO JOKE HONESTLY THIS CRAP HAS ALMOST TOOK MY MUMS LIFE!!

Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the purpose of this thread as no further was given. I beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt have included it. I feel there is racist tone in this thread.

ollieloudon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the

> title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the

> purpose of this thread as no further was given. I

> beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt

> have included it. I feel there is racist tone in

> this thread.


I disagree. I think someone is entitled to pass on the details/description of someone who has attacked their mother. I suspect that those are all the details that his mother has which he is passing on (although it would probably be more useful to know where, geographically, this took place). I'd expect the same to be passed on if they were white.


Hope your mum recovers soon Peckhamguy.

ollieloudon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the

> purpose of this thread as no further was given. I beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt

> have included it. I feel there is racist tone in this thread.


Interesting that you don't object to the identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist of you.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Interesting that you don't object to the

> identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist

> of you.


There has to be some form of identifying noun and the baseline ones are girl/boy/woman/man. Throwing in "black" for no reason that I can see does look rather odd. Sure the OP was just writing quickly when upset and did not have any racist intentions, but it does look odd, just as it would if it said "tall man," "short woman" or whatever. Given the number of black people living in this area I don't think the argument that it in any way helps identify the perpetrator holds any water.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > Interesting that you don't object to the

> > identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist

> > of you.

>

> There has to be some form of identifying noun and

> the baseline ones are girl/boy/woman/man.


Really? They could have used 'person', which is the real baseline.


But that is irrelevant to my point. I just found it interesting that ollieloudon saw one piece of supposed discrimination in the OP's description, but not the other. I thought it said a lot about ollieloudon specifically and what some sections of society see as 'acceptable' discrimination in general.

El Presidente Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We have actually reached the point where in the

> eyes of some, accurately describing an individuals

> appearance is racist.


To be fair, a few years ago on here it was pretty immediate. At least this one took over a week before it descended into that sort of crap.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Yes , me too, but you can always rely on

> rendelharris to do the libtard thing...


Ugh, please don't use that Americanism. 'Liberal' and 'left-wing' are very different (though not completely mutually exclusive)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
    • Unless you're 5 years old or have been living in a cave for several decades you can't be for real. I don't believe that you're genuinely confused by this, no one who has access to newspapers, the tv news, the internet would ask this. Either you're an infant, or have recently woken up from a coma after decades, or you're a supercilious tw*t
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...