Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Please be careful everyone

Was gonna write a whole load of details and information about it but my blood boils every time

My mum is not young and she is not well in the first place , and this has resulted in my mum having a stroke and being in hospital she is now Not the same person

I will prob come by tomorrow and give more details about the actual incident

Promise if I find the person I?m guaranteed to get a life sentence

MAIN THING IM HERE IS TO TELL EVERY ELDERLY LADY AND WOMAN DISTRACTED WALKING WITH THERE CHILDREN TO PLEASE WATCH OUT NO JOKE HONESTLY THIS CRAP HAS ALMOST TOOK MY MUMS LIFE!!

Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the purpose of this thread as no further was given. I beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt have included it. I feel there is racist tone in this thread.

ollieloudon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the

> title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the

> purpose of this thread as no further was given. I

> beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt

> have included it. I feel there is racist tone in

> this thread.


I disagree. I think someone is entitled to pass on the details/description of someone who has attacked their mother. I suspect that those are all the details that his mother has which he is passing on (although it would probably be more useful to know where, geographically, this took place). I'd expect the same to be passed on if they were white.


Hope your mum recovers soon Peckhamguy.

ollieloudon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not to sure why 'black boy' was needed in the title.Clearly identifying the criminal is not the

> purpose of this thread as no further was given. I beleive that if it was a white boy you wouldnt

> have included it. I feel there is racist tone in this thread.


Interesting that you don't object to the identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist of you.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Interesting that you don't object to the

> identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist

> of you.


There has to be some form of identifying noun and the baseline ones are girl/boy/woman/man. Throwing in "black" for no reason that I can see does look rather odd. Sure the OP was just writing quickly when upset and did not have any racist intentions, but it does look odd, just as it would if it said "tall man," "short woman" or whatever. Given the number of black people living in this area I don't think the argument that it in any way helps identify the perpetrator holds any water.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > Interesting that you don't object to the

> > identifying of the person as male. Rather sexist

> > of you.

>

> There has to be some form of identifying noun and

> the baseline ones are girl/boy/woman/man.


Really? They could have used 'person', which is the real baseline.


But that is irrelevant to my point. I just found it interesting that ollieloudon saw one piece of supposed discrimination in the OP's description, but not the other. I thought it said a lot about ollieloudon specifically and what some sections of society see as 'acceptable' discrimination in general.

El Presidente Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We have actually reached the point where in the

> eyes of some, accurately describing an individuals

> appearance is racist.


To be fair, a few years ago on here it was pretty immediate. At least this one took over a week before it descended into that sort of crap.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Yes , me too, but you can always rely on

> rendelharris to do the libtard thing...


Ugh, please don't use that Americanism. 'Liberal' and 'left-wing' are very different (though not completely mutually exclusive)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi Eleanor, I run the Just Dance Fit classes mentioned above. It would be lovely to have you there. I’m at the dance studio at Harris Girls’ Academy on Homestall Road throughout the year every Monday, Wednesday and Sunday: Mondays 6:30-7:30pm - Just Dance Fit Mondays 7:30-8:30pm - Flowetic Wednesdays 6:30-7:30pm - Flowetic Sundays 10:30-11:30am - Flowetic Lots of information and booking via the website: www.justdanceuk.com but if you have any questions don’t hesitate to drop me a line at 07522 231 446 or [email protected]. Hope this helps! Fiona =)
    • a) Because they published a leaflet in Urdu promising to give "Muslims a strong voice". This is reprehensible - just as a party that promised to give Protestants or Jews or Buddhists alone "a strong voice" would be acting in a sectarian manner. Parties - especially socialist ones like the English & Welsh Greens are now - should not be assymetrically promoting the interests of one religious group. b) Because they published a video in Urdu and Bangla criticising Kier Starmer for meeting Narendra Modi, when Modi has nothing to do with the issues discussed. Modi is a Hindu nationalist bigot - but in this context, the Greens are just shitstirring existing tensions between British Hindus and British Muslims for the purpose of trying to win Muslim votes - see the first point. FWIW I don't have any problem with parties communicating with the electorate in languages other than English (from Irish to Polish to Malayalam). What is very suspicious is when parties pump out sectarian messages only in one language... When Mamdani ran for Mayor of NYC (and won) he released plenty of campaign videos in multiple languages - but always with English subtitles too. There was never a suggestion he was sending different, sectarian messages to different groups.     https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-greens-made-advert-urdu-164616073.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/uk-green-party-accused-of-sectarianism-after-releasing-videos-in-urdu-and-bangla-featuring-pm-modi-and-gaza/articleshow/128826689.cms  
    • @Sue the Green's campaign video showing Keir Starmer shaking hands with Modi and David Lammy shaking hands with Netanyahu is one such example.  As I say, I don't know the organisation, but I would expect election observers to only report after polls have closed. To do otherwise could be perceived as interfering in the election. They might need to check patterns across multiple polling stations. Any public criticism by an independent observer mid-poll could discourage participation and could be interpreted as campaigning. Much safer / more robust to check observations and release after the event.  Sorry - those posts merged. Not intended.   
    • Could you be more specific as to how "the Greens have practiced this on a far more significant scale in Gorton and Denton"? How exactly did they "try to exploit ethic tensions"?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...