Any eligible bachelors in East D looking for...

[katie1997]

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gelatinous Slimy Orange Har? er.. Hat?

You see, Brendan is clearly a hit with the 'ladeez' too. *Bob* and Brendan. Sigh.

(???? - you are soooo right about that, I have noticed it more recently too! Wonder why?)

[emc]

Hey - I posted on this a little while ago now for myself (and was brave enough to put up a pic) and got some responses, some of which turned into dates...there are definitely some nice (single) men in ED, not right for me (or me for them) but they are out there...

[????]

Long term Brendan, next Thursday

[Brendan]

That?s ok. I stopped doing Thursdays back in ?97.

[LadyDeliah]

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brendan Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Gelatinous Slimy Orange Har? er.. Hat?

>

> You see, Brendan is clearly a hit with the

> 'ladeez' too. *Bob* and Brendan. Sigh.

>

>

>

> (???? - you are soooo right about that, I have

> noticed it more recently too! Wonder why?)

Because he obviously has some other attributes she values!

[Mick Mac]

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thinking about it, I've seen more examples of an

> intelligence gap the other way, intelligent woman

> with thick men...nearly always a failure long term

Well its working out for me so far.

edited to say - whoops Brendan has done that one already. Thats how thick I am.

[zeban]

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Actually and observationlly, most of the properly

> intelligent men I know seem to be partnered with

> equally intelligent women so some sexist

> horrendous crappy steretypes going on here....from

> the ladies. Most of the men I know with 'bits of

> trinket fluff' (mmmmm) are themselves of the dense

> variety.

Absolutely agree Quids

[Loz]

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Because he obviously has some other attributes she

> values!

Ha! And they say men are shallow!

[TillieTrotter]

Don't take my comment too seriously I was just showing solidarity to the sisterhood. I'm the fluffiest fluff of the lot. ;-)

[StraferJack]

(you can swap the genders below at will - I've written them as they apply to this thread)

women who regularly berate men, who say they are happy single*, and have the "the energy to enjoy many of them" are also the women who will bend your ear (in person, facebook, on here) about the lack of good men. (and if it looks as if I'm talking specifically about posters on here, I'm really not. This circle is much wider)

You would think by the law of averages, if nothing else, they stand a much better chance of meeting a good one

But no, it is they who at night spend their time, not expending energy on "many men" (usually anyway) but wondering why they are so miserable and alone

* actually they may admit to not being happy single. They may profess a desire to settle but can't find the right one. This is wrong, that's wrong. But it's never them that has issues. No sirreee

[Ted Max]

Have a happy bank holiday, one and all.

[????]

Did you put your safety glasses on when you lit that fuse Strafer?

[Jah Lush]

He has a point though.

[Atticus]

Strafer, fasten your seatbelt.

[TillieTrotter]

It's really frustrating that work has blocked page 3 as it contains tasteless or offensive materials. What the heck have you said SJ and was it in response to my comment? I know where you live. ;-)

[*Bob*]

He should be safe for now. Most of the man-hungry hormonally imbalanced bunny boiling singletons will be down the pub by now, flashing their tits at anything with a scrotum.

But when they get home (angry, drunk.. and alone) - there's going to be trouble.

[Atticus]

I'll be glass in hand, watching, waiting... god I'm sad

[LadyDeliah]

Hmm, food for thought.

In my experience it's because the men who can satisfy you physically don't tend to be the ones who satisfy you mentally, so it's a toss up. Do you go for the stimulating conversation and mediocre sex, or forgo the intellectual and get your groove on regularly.

Not only that, women who are more demanding sexually, are likely to be less attractive to some men, than a woman who likes to please the man more than take her own pleasure, for a variety of reasons.

I think to say there are no good men out there is lazy and inaccurate. It would be more accurate for women like the ones you have described SJ, to say there are no men who can both shag and talk well enough to satisfy her tastes!

[LadyDeliah]

But the hunt is fun!

[maxxi]

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmm, food for thought.

>

> In my experience it's because the men who can

> satisfy you physically don't tend to be the ones

> who satisfy you mentally, so it's a toss up. Do

> you go for the stimulating conversation and

> mediocre sex, or forgo the intellectual and get

> your groove on regularly.

>

> Not only that, women who are more demanding

> sexually, are likely to be less attractive to some

> men, than a woman who likes to please the man more

> than take her own pleasure, for a variety of

> reasons.

>

> I think to say there are no good men out there is

> lazy and inaccurate. It would be more accurate

> for women like the ones you have described SJ, to

> say there are no men who can both shag and talk

> well enough to satisfy her tastes!

surely you mean shag and listen

[StraferJack]

Whilst I won't deny your experiences lady d, I have to fundamentally state your conclusions are wrong.

[StraferJack]

Ah yes "the hunt is fun"

Good luck with that

[katie1997]

???? and Laddy Muck - gettin' slow or what?

[StraferJack]

@tillie

Nothing I said, and I can't find anything obviously block worthy

[TillieTrotter]

Goodo.