Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Do you accept the assertion that if rugby wasn't a fringe sport then it would be highly unlikely that Dulwich would have two ex pupils in the England squad?"



No


This youth club has had various players in the England football team, and there are similar places in London and Merseyside.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Do you accept the assertion that if rugby wasn't

> a fringe sport then it would be highly unlikely

> that Dulwich would have two ex pupils in the

> England squad?"

>

>

> No

>

> This youth club has had various players in the

> England football team, and there are similar

> places in London and Merseyside.


That youth club is a school of excellence that recruits boys from all over the North East. A hot bed of footballing talent.


In my opinion the presence of two Dulwich College lads in the England team says more about the limited appeal of rugby than the sporting success of the school.


I'm surprised that you genuinely believe otherwise but you are of course entitled to your beliefs.

anyone can join a rugby club from any age- its not elitist at all in that sense- they have both worked really hard after they left school to get into the england team- there schooling obvioulsy had an effect on moulding their talent but its the work they have subsequently put in that really matters

I think its more to do with their schools not playing football or even their culture not valuing football as highly.


Baiting the rugby lads was a regular Wednesday night affair at uni. Josh Lucy even pushed me once but I let him off (shat myself I mean). They were all too nice to actually fight though. Well brought up too much to lose....

If there are ten million people in the UK who play football and one million people who play rugby, then surely it's ten times easier/less difficult to become a top rugby player than it is to become a top footballer. Isn't it?


Which doesn't mean they're all communal shower-loving, arse-feeling, thigh-slapping, wet towel-flicking posho-types.. it's just a statistical fact, innit?

My daughter's at the Charter and they play rugby there - even she does 'touch rugby' and really enjoys it.


She's also been identified as having an 'exceptional ability' at basketball although quite how they worked that out after a few weeks I'm not sure and neither is she. She suspects her talent is being taller than the other kids. Anyway she's on a special basketball training camp this week - it being half-term. Don't remember things like that 'in my day'.

dc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My daughter's at the Charter and they play rugby

> there - even she does 'touch rugby' and really

> enjoys it.

>

> She's also been identified as having an

> 'exceptional ability' at basketball although quite

> how they worked that out after a few weeks I'm not

> sure and neither is she. She suspects her talent

> is being taller than the other kids. Anyway she's

> on a special basketball training camp this week -

> it being half-term. Don't remember things like

> that 'in my day'.


Schools get 'gifted and talented' money for super kids. It pays to identify them earlier. Congratulations she's officially a basketball genius.

I think fewer schools do play rugby but it is not a striaghtforward private vs state school split eg Alleyns doesn't play rugby.



Thats a real rarity though and stems from the time it split from Dulwich College. An agreement was made where Dulwich was to be a rugby school, Alleyns Football

Referring mainly to the comments made by Alan Dale, is there a reason for the slightly negative approach? Are you unable to feel somewhat proud of there being two players linked with the local area?


Having been a pupil at Dulwich College up until last year, I know that football has only been taken seriously at the school within the past couple of years (introduced as a lesson with teams formed to represent the school), previous to this, the schools main sport was rugby. This is probably the main reason why none of the well known footballers attended the school. This being said, you may find that within a few years, there could be a number of ex-pupils playing football for major teams.


Maybe I have misunderstood a number of the comments posted throughout this thread, but in my opinion, the overall feeling has been more negative than positive. This is annoying as although Dulwich is a private school, I feel it does not make much of a difference in this instance. If the school has helped produce two excellent rugby players, so be it.. don?t put the school down! Would similar comments been posted if the two players attended Kingsdale?

Alan Dale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think its more to do with their schools not

> playing football or even their culture not valuing

> football as highly.

>

> Baiting the rugby lads was a regular Wednesday

> night affair at uni. Josh Lucy even pushed me once

> but I let him off (shat myself I mean). They were

> all too nice to actually fight though. Well

> brought up too much to lose....



who,s josh lucy?

spadetownboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Dale Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think its more to do with their schools not

> > playing football or even their culture not

> valuing

> > football as highly.

> >

> > Baiting the rugby lads was a regular Wednesday

> > night affair at uni. Josh Lucy even pushed me

> once

> > but I let him off (shat myself I mean). They

> were

> > all too nice to actually fight though. Well

> > brought up too much to lose....

>

>

> who,s josh lucy?



My thoughts exactly. He's a rugby player. Apparently it's spelt differently though.

Thomas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Referring mainly to the comments made by Alan

> Dale, is there a reason for the slightly negative

> approach?


Just being a bit cheeky really. Seems everyone is all over rugby at the moment because England did well. I wonder whether the relevance of Rugby in modern Britain is being overstated in order to boost national morale.


Are you unable to feel somewhat proud of

> there being two players linked with the local

> area?


Completely indifferent to the England lads backgrounds. Certainly not proud - I don't see that it has anything to do with me.



Would similar comments been posted if the two players attended Kingsdale?


Assuming that Kingsdale is a comp then I guess I would have made some sort of gleefull post about how the increased popularity of Rugby meant that the comp lads were now keeping the public school lads out of the team. Pie in the sky though isn't it?

I think it will remain the way it is - when I went to school (private) we played rugby and football. We also played against private and state schools. When we played Rugby against the local state school all they wanted to do was fight us and call us gay and we always soundly beat them. When we played Football all we did was try to foul them and call them poor and they soundly beat us. It's only when you go to Uni that this segregation disappears - by then you have missed the chance to play prof sport. (Unless you are Nick Easter or Ian Wright)


Think it all balances out in the end.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The other thing I do at an ATM, is cover the card slot with my right hand while the card is in there. I then use my left hand for the rest. If a card does not come out, then you can look for a skimming device and remove it, ATMs are badly designed imo. They could be recessed to make side sccess impossible for a would be theif. The pin number aspect is a weakness also.
    • It's a criminal offense. CICs can't fundraise on the street - they're a less regulated form of organization and that lighter touch means you can't do certain things until you commit to greater regulation.   If you want to fundraise on the street then you need to become a charity. if they have mislead a shop by stating that they are a charity, they're breaking criminal law. if they're on the pavement, again they are not licensed to do that and are breaking the law.  
    • Excellent, I hope so!
    • It's certainly a risky strategy, as well as ticking everyone off, the gazunderer risks losing the property and also their costs incurred during the process e.g. legal & survey. It's hard to mitigate against but I always think that if you're desperate to sell, don't ever convey that  to your estate agent, as that info more than likely gets passed on to potential buyers. You should be doing that regardless of whether gazundering is happening or not, as it will affect the offers you receive... That's correct. Some agents have policies in place to 'discourage' gazundering and gazumping, but ultimately it comes down to the morals of the buyer...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...