Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Actually a shop with a plan. No food on shelves means no sales. No sales means shop closes. Waitrose listens to EDF and take over premises. New Waitrose store. Existing staff joins final salary pension scheme. Everyone is happy. Life goes on...

Considering the Co-Op was started as a 'Peoples Store' with fair prices,

Anyone remember the 'Divvy' Dividends. They were the little tin cheques that you could

collect and spend in the store.

the prices are not exactly Cheap.


High Prices and Use by Date so short, you would be lucky to get your goods home before they have gone off.


I use it to pay some Utility Bills as they have Pay-Point.

I suspect that, outwith the somewhat bullish terms in the attached article, the Coop has not actually yet overcome the logistics issues of its Somerfield take-over. Sainsbury's also had a major problem about 5 years ago, which it did overcome. Whatever the reason, empty shelves or old stock will certainly lead to loss of customers locally, and should do so.


http://www.co-operative.coop/food/whats-hot/Food-news/New-depot-will-complete-Co-operative-Food-Logistics-overhaul/

Plastic card. Not only are there are no medieval tokens, you don't even have to lick stamps. Although for some reason Co-op still cannot issue cards to people on the spot, like all the other shops.


Do not quite understand either why Co-op doesn't adapt its stock more to suit the store locations...like all the other shops. Eg, on the Brockley Road, there's a (Budgens?) which is far more responsive to demand and which as a result, (ironically..is that the right word?) has a much wider variety of (self advertised anyway) fair trade, veggie, organic goods on sale. The neighbouring Co-op sticks to very narrow range, which you could understand if it meant that at least what they stocked was so tailored to their market that it always sold, but like the Forest Hill and Lordship Lane ones, this branch regularly runs out of essentials (milk! why no milk??) and has quite a lot of unsold sold-bys that it chucks out each day.


And then there's the Co-op Chemist on Lordship Lane that is still stocked from the 1970s. Why would anyone so determinedly ignore a huge untapped customer base and leave local independents to stock ranges your natural Co-op friendly person would go for?


Somebody did wonders reinvigorating the Co-op Bank so it's a shame they didn't get round to the rest of the Co-op bits.(Although the Co-op not the foreign payments outfit got missed for some reason...is still used by many NGOs out of principle, but again, is losing business from its natural constituency because it is soooo slow and out of date).


(I would just like to apologise for having a bit of a rant there. I hope the East Dulwich Forum gets some kind of health promotion grant from the EU, for allowing one to vent virtually so that one can then be all sweetness and smiles in the actual Co-op at all times. Although not in Tesco. It would be wrong to smile in Tesco.)

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> This used to be Co-op but changed to a Sogim

> Pharmacy, ironically enough, around the same time

> the Co-op took over Somerfields



True, but it doesn't seem to have made a blind bit of difference.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I still get dividends.

> Are you a member of the Co-op?


xxxxxxx


I just got ?11.47 in divvy :)


Amazing how eggs and oranges must add up over the year :)


ETA: And let's be fair, the big Sainsbury's on Dog Kennel Hill quite often has empty shelves and I can't get things on my list.

I can't believe the Co-op ever sells any milk. Every single time I have been in there the four pint cartons have one day left before their best-before.


Or maybe they sell gallons of the stuff and I always get there after everyone else has already grabbed it :)

Twirly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > >

> > This used to be Co-op but changed to a Sogim

> > Pharmacy, ironically enough, around the same

> time

> > the Co-op took over Somerfields

>

>

> True, but it doesn't seem to have made a blind bit

> of difference.



no - same tat but no divvy. may be the only place in western world you can still buy Brut.

I've lived near the co-op on Forest Hill for four years now and consitently have a whinge on here about it's empty shelves, (though half the time it feels like most of the food seems to get stacked on the floor, poor customer service, terrible perishables and over pricing of half the stuff...oh, and the fact that they use the pavement outside as the stock room and fill it with empty cages all day every day...it seems that this is the co-op way so don't hold out any hopes for the LL branch..."Good with Food"????? Trading standards should look into that claim!

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> no - same tat but no divvy.


xxxxxxx


This just isn't true, sorry!


The Co-op in Lordship Lane has a much better range of things than Somerfield ever had, including a lot of Fair Trade items. They also have very good special offers sometimes.


It's far from perfect, but it's unfair to call it tat.


And there is divvy - as I said above, I just got over eleven quid, which I can get paid straight into my bank account. And I don't do my main shop there, just odds and ends.


You have to join their membership scheme and get a card, however, and use it when you buy stuff, obviously, before you are eligible for divvy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...