Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I would, genuinely, like to know whether the relatively flat north of the borough has been gritted, leaving the hilly south to suffer. Or whether there is equal (well, hill effects apart) pain for all Southwark's residents (and electors). If anyone has penetrated past the DKH road blocks into upper Southwark, how are things faring there?

Chadwick Road on the Camberwell Grove bridge closure diversion, long hill with iced over railway bridge at the top, appears to be un-gritted although should be on Southwark's gritting list.


If you have to stop anywhere on road due to cars passing, difficult to restart, coming down icy as hell.


Southwark have said they have gritted not seen a thing every since snow started.


Hope this helps

37 into Brixton this morning was fine - bit slow, but journey took no longer than usual.



It seems that Southwark have money in specific pots - eg money for lampposts; no money for grit - and don't seem able to understand that one is actually important and wanted.


Of course, there are so many other things......

They were gritting last night. I crossed paths with one outside JAGS on East Dulwich Grove at around 8pm. Dicey drive down Champion hill this morning. A car had slid into the central bollard at the bottom which caused a bit of chaos. Dog Kennel hill was backed up all the way to the top though.
Can it just be noted that snow like this - which will probably be gone by the weekend - occurs about once every five years or so these days? If Southwark kept fleets of gritters and staff to man them on standby throughout the winter, ready for a once-in-a-lustrum weather event, how would that sit with the "Southwark waste so much of our money" brigade?

It is reasonable to expect that certain roads are gritted - especially with the advance warning that we have had.


Southern - for instance - have been running empty trains all night so the tracks are fine this morning.


It's reasonable to expect the borough to get it's arse.in.gear, so to speak.


DKH this morning was dangerous - and it not a surprise that it would be heavily used.

It should be the case they can fetch vehicles in ahead of such a weather event, if you want to use that rather "in" phrase. Grit/salt boxes are there, all they need is a couple of workers to distribute it onto pavements. Keeping all roads clear is unrealistic but the main roads really ought to be kept clear. We don't need to keep them on standby throughout the year, just hire them in when necessary or tender the work out to specialists who have been primed to be ready with in X hours' notice.

Perhaps I should be a council officer and earn my bonus, or - better still - a consultant to earn the big bucks for my radical plan!

Of course it would be possible - anything's possible - to have enough resources to hand to deal with unusual weather; are we prepared to pay the extra council tax for that? Or should we just accept that very, very occasionally the weather will get the better of us and leave the cars (and bikes) at home?

We live in a northern hemisphere country, the south east of the country is next to a giant land mass which can get very cold during winter. It?s february. None of this is rocket science, snow happens in winter. The people of the north get more snow than we get, have less resources than we have, and a wider area to cover at regional level. They still manage to grit roads and people still manage to make it to work on time despite the weather. They don?t need chains on their tyres either! It?s just bizarre how London struggles with anything. It?s too hot, there are too many leaves, it?s snwoig, it?s too windy. Get a grip.


Louisa.

Cycling down Forest Hill Road through Peckham down to Peckham Library was treacherous this morning. Compacted snow and ice. Worst I've experienced for a decade in London. No sign of gritting. And then the roads north of the library to OKR and through to Blackfriars were alright. Probably down to intensity of use by buses and other vehicles than any gritting. Cycle lanes up Blackfriars Road over the bridge and up Farringdon were full of snow and ice.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They have grit they buy it in every winter- and

> there is a dept of transport emergency stock so

> there is NO excuse. Well... except for trotting

> out the lies about 'tory cuts' yet again


Are you claiming that it's a lie that the budget has been cut since 2010 by successive Tory governments? Because if so that's even worse rubbish than usual, in 2015 London councils as a whole received ?9.9bn in revenue resource grants, in 2019 that will have dropped to ?2.2bn.


Southwark may have adequate salt supplies (not grit, technically) but they only have three salting lorries. You want more, we, as taxpayers, will have to pay for more (they're about ?100,000 a pop) - oh no it's that horrid Labour council deliberately not buying any when they could but they want to make the government look bad. According to you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...