Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh dear, Moos, now even the veggies are in

> trouble. Looks like it's only the vegans who can

> say all their food is 'cruelty free'.

>

> So no biscuits or cakes for the veggies. Unless

> they are a bunch of hypocrites.



I bet that post has made your day & given you the best xmas present ever?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob*

>

> Always admired Bob. But where I think he got

> something completely wrong here (and unfortunately

> many people agreed with him) was in suggesting

> that the objection to fois gras was somehow linked

> to the class or wealth of the fois gras consumer.

>

>

> Hence the fois gras supporters allow the thread to

> deviate into discussions on battery hens and fox

> hunting.

>

> It's not that at all. It's a case of those eating

> fois gras being responsible for keeping alive an

> industry that knowingly and purposefully inflicts

> pain on an animal daily, with the aim of making

> that animal ill enough for you to enjoy its

> diseased liver.

>

> For that, you should all be ashamed. (There is no

> get out clause available by reference to other

> animal mistreatments.)



Well said. By the way did you know that I'm a Guardian reader? No nor did I!!! I love the way Loz jumps to huge sweeping generalisations. Pompous arse.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Well said. By the way did you know that I'm a Guardian reader? No nor did I!!! I love the way

> Loz jumps to huge sweeping generalisations.

> Pompous arse.


Or I just know how to press your buttons...

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > Oh dear, Moos, now even the veggies are in trouble. Looks like it's only the vegans who can

> > say all their food is 'cruelty free'.

> >

> > So no biscuits or cakes for the veggies. Unless they are a bunch of hypocrites.

>

>

> I bet that post has made your day & given you the best xmas present ever?


Quite possibly, yes! The battery chicken argument was useful to throw open the wider hypocrisy (and reverse snobbery) of the non-veggies that popped up. But to show the veggies that their food is also mired in animal cruelty on a much bigger scale that fois gras could ever reach was indeed a pretty fine Christmas bonus. Any complaints about foie gras from them now would just be hypocritical.


Looks like the veggies can't have their cake and eat it too!

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Well said. By the way did you know that I'm a

> Guardian reader? No nor did I!!! I love the way

> > Loz jumps to huge sweeping generalisations.

> > Pompous arse.

>

> Or I just know how to press your buttons..

Nah, you're just a pompous arse.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > Parkdrive Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > > Well said. By the way did you know that I'm a Guardian reader? No nor did I!!! I love the way

> > > Loz jumps to huge sweeping generalisations.

> > > Pompous arse.

> >

> > Or I just know how to press your buttons..


> Nah, you're just a pompous arse.


Well I suppose I would prefer to be that rather than being a self-righteous, sanctimonious hypocrite like you!

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your post proves how truly ignorant you are.

>

> I despair.

>

> Bowing out of this thread now because it's making me sick.


Well, I suppose that is one way of saying you have no counter argument. I didn't really think you would.

This is a bit of an odd thread even for the EDF, and I've taken the bait, but never mind:


It's no secret that major food manufacturers are still using battery eggs, and for anyone who actually cares it's pretty easy to avoid them.


Co-op, M&S and Waitrose only use free range eggs in their own brand ranges. Other supermarkets/manufacturers have made commitments to cut back their use or phase them out altogether (e.g. Hellmans switched to free range recently).


So I regularly enjoy a wide range of cake thanks very much!

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Loz Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > > Parkdrive Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > > Well said. By the way did you know that I'm

> a Guardian reader? No nor did I!!! I love the way

> > > > Loz jumps to huge sweeping generalisations.

> > > > Pompous arse.

> > >

> > > Or I just know how to press your buttons..

>

> > Nah, you're just a pompous arse.

>

> Well I suppose I would prefer to be that rather

> than being a self-righteous, sanctimonious

> hypocrite like you!


And how do you I'm a hypocrite, you pompous arse. How do you what I eat? Your view point suggests that, regardless of whatever suffering is visited on the creature and the way its reared, provided it tastes good you don't give a fcuk, which makes you a nasty pompous excuse for a human being. Will you being baby seal clubbed to death to your diet, afterr all according to your rationale (or marked lack of it)it doesn't matter how they are treated as long as they taste goodn happy days. Despicable.

I think Loz was suggesting that if you were refusing to eat Foie Gras because of the suffering of ducks and geese, that you'd need to follow that principle through to all the other animals in our food chain.


If you didn't do that, then you would be simply picking and choosing what suffering you thought was okay according to your own favored foods - a practice that would undoubtedly be hypocritical.


Far from saying that it didn't matter how animals were treated before consumption (which is what you're accusing him of), he was pointing out that Foie Gras was simply one item an extremely extensive list when it came to 'cruelty'.


It's worth pointing out that when you get independent scientists involved in an appraisal of the treatment of ducks and geese in the creation of Foie Gras, that they can find NO evidence that this process is any MORE abusive than any of the other standard processes in breeding fowl for consumption.


Before anyone does their nut over that comment, please read it again: scientists didn't say force feeding wasn't cruel, that just said that they couldn't find it was any more cruel than the rest of the insults we dish out to poultry.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>


zapped because Hugo said it better]


Or more correctly because you don't possess an original, rational argument of your own. Proof positive, as if it was needed, that you are and arse an much much worse.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> zapped because Hugo said it better]

>

> Or more correctly because you don't possess an original, rational argument of your own. Proof

> positive, as if it was needed, that you are and arse an much much worse.


Really? Is that the best you can do to avoid answering Hugo's points?

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Parkdrive Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Loz Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > > Parkdrive Wrote:

> > > >

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > >

> > > > > Well said. By the way did you know that

> I'm

> > a Guardian reader? No nor did I!!! I love the

> way

> > > > > Loz jumps to huge sweeping

> generalisations.

> > > > > Pompous arse.

> > > >

> > > > Or I just know how to press your buttons..

> >

> > > Nah, you're just a pompous arse.

> >

> > Well I suppose I would prefer to be that rather

> > than being a self-righteous, sanctimonious

> > hypocrite like you!

>

> And how do you I'm a hypocrite, you pompous arse.

> How do you what I eat? Your view point suggests

> that, regardless of whatever suffering is visited

> on the creature and the way its reared, provided

> it tastes good you don't give a fcuk, which makes

> you a nasty pompous excuse for a human being. Will

> you being baby seal clubbed to death to your diet,

> afterr all according to your rationale (or marked

> lack of it)it doesn't matter how they are treated

> as long as they taste goodn happy days.

> Despicable.



Dear oh dear!!

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PD, just walk away from this thread, it makes you

> angry and they have openly said they are trying to

> wind you up.

>

> Not worth spoiling your Christmas over!

Thanks for your concern, but it takes a lot more than the ramblings of an odious EDF poster to spoil my day. People with such disgusting tastes need to be told they're wrong as they can't see it themselves. As for being wound up by Loz, I'm pretty sure his blood pressure goes through the roof every time I tweak his pompous nose.

Voyageur Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But it's just a slagging match now - right ?

>

> Absolutely - who can be more abusive to whom I

> guess. Topic matter seems irelevant.


That's your opinion and you're entitled to it, regardless of how wide of the mark you may be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...