Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ooooh, shush Ricky - don't let the workers hear you.


Offal is the only good honest food - meat (as in muscle) was only for rich kids, not good honest toilers.


These are all offal:


Faggots (liver and cheek)

Black Pudding (blood)

Pork Pie (feet)

Tripe (guts)

Steak and Kidney Pie

Luncehon Meat (Tongue)

Liver

Brawn (pigs head)

Haggis (liver, heart and lungs)

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ooooh, shush Ricky - don't let the workers hear

> you.

>

> Offal is the only good honest food - meat (as in

> muscle) was only for rich kids, not good honest

> toilers.

>

> These are all offal:

>

> Faggots (liver and cheek)

> Black Pudding (blood)

> Pork Pie (feet)

> Tripe (guts)

> Steak and Kidney Pie

> Luncehon Meat (Tongue)

> Liver

> Brawn (pigs head)

> Haggis (liver, heart and lungs)



When you meat eaters actually think about what you are eating, does it not put you off just a teeny weeny bit?

Reading the above makes me so glad I'm veggie.

it is well konwn that vegeterians are sicker more often and not abel to do a full days work it is not natutal to eat to mkany vegetebles is it not the eec who have to sell their veg mountians to persons and so the goverments promote the lies of 5 a day and fruit jouses for lazy farmers in france

SpaghettiSue40 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> True, I dont think I could fancy a man that was a

> vegetarian and deff not a vegan :-S



Are you saying that vegetarians are not as fanciable as meat eaters?


Do we look different or something?


Interesting comment, because if you do a bit of research, you will find that eating meat is actually bad for you.

So if you go for a veggie partner, chances are, they will live longer!

A disproportionate number of vegetarians that I know look a little anaemic. It's not a criticism, just saying like.


Unfortunately by dint of their restricted diet, veggies do need to be slightly over fastidious, which isn't very attractive.


I have the same slightly lowered attraction for my friends of various faiths here in Singers who have arbitrarily imposed dietary restrictions.


So yeah, I guess, not as fanciable. :(

Aquarius Moon:

"Are you saying that vegetarians are not as fanciable as meat eaters?


Do we look different or something?


Interesting comment, because if you do a bit of research, you will find that eating meat is actually bad for you.

So if you go for a veggie partner, chances are, they will live longer!

"


So veggies live longer, with uglier partners. Not much of a consolation for missing-out on meat is it.

If we're not supposed to eat animals, why are they made of meat ?

Yes of course they are Tom, but there's laws against eating people, I think from memory the term coined for the pastime was 'cannibalism', I'm not sure what the law against it is called though I'm sure some bright spark here will have time to find the details on WWW.


I haven't seen any laws saying don't eat (non-human) meat, though clearly if you get in charge things may change rapidly, so I'll be practicing making nut roast leading up to Christmas, just in case.


If I did take your point literally, I don't think it'd go down well in court if I try to justify taking someone's leg and roasting it for tea by arguing, "..well it IS meat, sir" !

Tops.


I wonder if we'd get 20 pages of comment on these boards if Franklins was serving human flesh ?

Probably 5-6 pages I reckon.

Thomas Micklewright Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> humans are made of flesh kruger?


True, but most humans are meat-eaters, and so would not be good to eat.


In case of a plane crash in a remote area, always eat the vegetarians first. Then, the airline meals.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They are very good
    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
    • Thought I'd add a comment as sadly there are now too many primary schools for the number of children in this area... St Anthony's is a wonderful school and my 2 sons were extremely happy throughout the time they were there. They have some open days for reception and  nursery in Nov I believe and welcome children and families of all faiths and backgrounds. It has lovely staff and I cannot recommend it more highly!
    • Anyone has lavender buds they don’t want/that I could harvest/cut and use? Ideally in Peckham/ED goose green area.  Thanks in advance!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...