Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know not strictly ED but here goes.

Dulwich Village~beautiful Georgian mansions, two pristine parks, the prestigious Picture Gallery,the "Dog" glowingly renovated, a tranquil green oasis in the maelstrom of South London, for all our benefits.. In its very midst a vandalised, filthy and reeking telephone box, an insult to its Conservation Area location. I have approached:

BT~the operators (although I cannot believe that any one would ever use it). NOT interested.

Dulwich Estate~nowt to do with us~NOT interested.

Dulwich Society (" To foster and safeguard the amenities of Dulwich")~NOT interested

Southwark Council~far too busy spending our taxes on daft, expensive road "improvements"~NOT interested.

Where to turn to now, or do we just let this dilapidated sore fester?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/185178-carbuncle-in-dulwich-village/
Share on other sites

If BT agree, and the telephone itself is no longer working or used, it might be worth getting ancommunity renovation project sorted. And turning the phone box into a small trust library. I?ve seen them in Devon and Cornwall before and people even sell eggs and small homemade cakes in them!


Louisa.

This links to the process document which describes the procedures that BT is obliged to follow to remove a public phone box. It is non trivial, complex (costly) and can readily be blocked by 'interested parties' who don't want to see the box go.


https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0035/47879/removing_callboxes.pdf


At least one argument which could be made is that there are schools around it where pupils, without or deprived of their mobile phone could summon help or assistance.


I suspect that this may be a reason why BT is reluctant to 'do anything' about it.

I think the OP means the one in the centre of the village outside the wine shop, next to the zebra crossing. I'm sure there used to be another one at the back of the gallery but not sure if that's still there.


ETA: the one behind the gallery is still there and looking good, so probably not the one the OP means.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Homes for people who have been granted asylum is one thing. Homes for asylum seekers is something else.  
    • that's missing the point  
    • Central and local government are going to have to do multiple things at once (as opposed to the James Barber approach of "there are other things that need to be done by other people elsewhere, so we shouldn't approve building new housing here"). £200m across multiple councils across the whole of England and Wales is not going to crowd out opportunities to build more social housing and to approve other housing built at private expense.
    • Question for those with children at DVIS: how do you manage the limited number of places at the after-school wraparound care? In reality - does everyone who wants a place get one because so many don't need it? What alternative wraparound care are people using? Thanks!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...