Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My post was reasonable and true and surely not racist or whatever u r calling me.

I can?t believe that in one of the comments someone said well either said I?m a neo nazi or I?m using words symbols what a neo nazi would use if I remember correctly either way it?s pathetic.

Good night all

✌️Piece

Do you really think there is nothing extreme or worthy of condemnation on that site PeckhamGuy?


It is a simple question, one simple emough that even you should be anle to answer. And when you answer that question, take a look at your deleted post again (it is copied in the following post) and have a really good think about it.

Hi Peckhamguy -


I'm going to assume that you genuinely are mystified about what's wrong on that site.


The issue for all of us here is your remark that you 'see nothing wrong' with the website.


So - first off the poster for the website had a swastika and a knife on it, and the site logo is an SS-style bolt of lightning. This obviously references the Nazi party. There are posts promoting graffiti saying 'Nazi', with swastikas, and another image of the swastika combined with a union jack.


I hope that you are aware of the second world war. I find it hard to believe that you are not aware of this major event in world history.


Displaying the insignia of the Nazis is disgusting. There's no two sides to that argument. Showing support for the Nazis is offensive.


It's also unpatriotic - I expect you think of yourself as a proud English man, don't you? So I'm sure you can see that combining the union jack and the swastika is an insult to all the British people who fought and died in the war to stop the Nazis.


As you go down the page, it says 'Non whites, jews, muslims are all bad.' That is very unambiguously a rascist remark. If you agree with that remark you are a rascist.


If you 'see nothing wrong' with the site, you are a neo-nazi and a rascist.


I'm sorry if you don't like those labels, but on the other hand, if your behaviour fits those categories (and it does) that's what we are going to call you.


Given that you've put your full name on other posts on this site, I don't think it's been the best advertisement for your electrician business and perhaps your non white neighbours will be a bit upset to find out what you think of them.

Amy A;



Thank you for a far more coherent and reasoned response than I was able to muster. I had to delete my reply before pressing ?post? because it wasn?t going to be helpful, but you?ve managed to do it much better.



Peckhamguy - you really should have a word with yourself.

Hi,


I just want to make one further point here. I should start by saying I am the type of 'Marxist maggot' that the poster is threatening, and I'm very much anti-racist.


However I take issue with the way in which Peckhamguy has seemingly been ganged up on and almost silenced by other posters. I am not for a minute taking his side in terms of his argument, however I'm taking his side as I think people have been rude to him. I've seen a couple of posts, for example, insulting his use of English, or just shouting him down in a way that isn't particularly constructive. I don't see how personal insults of right wingers do anything productive.

Jim1234 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi,

>

> I just want to make one further point here. I

> should start by saying I am the type of 'Marxist

> maggot' that the poster is threatening, and I'm

> very much anti-racist.

>

> However I take issue with the way in which

> Peckhamguy has seemingly been ganged up on and

> almost silenced by other posters. I am not for a

> minute taking his side in terms of his argument,

> however I'm taking his side as I think people have

> been rude to him. I've seen a couple of posts, for

> example, insulting his use of English, or just

> shouting him down in a way that isn't particularly

> constructive. I don't see how personal insults of

> right wingers do anything productive.


For starters, Jim, his original post was absurd, saying that there was nothing on that vile neo-nazi website that was untrue or offensive:


Peckhamguy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Went on the site and could not find much wrong as

> there is loads of news articles on there about

> police scandals ,Muslim grooming gangs etc will

> have a better look on the site but the articles

> they have put up are all true as people have been

> prosecuted for all offences labelled on there, you

> lot must have seen something I did not see.


He then deleted his post (though he's still defending it and saying it was reasonable and true) and called everyone who disagreed with him "snowflakes." He has not been "ganged up on" unless you regard anyone with whom the majority disagree as being "ganged up on." I can see one post which might qualify as mildly rude (not as rude as Peckhamguy's own posts though); the rest of them are simply asking why he finds a site that advocates killing Muslims and Jews, rants about "Paki rapists" etc etc acceptable. If someone puts up posts effectively saying they find a neo-nazi website acceptable, and calling those who object to it snowflakes, it's perfectly reasonable that they should be challenged.

Jim1234 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi,

>

> I just want to make one further point here. I

> should start by saying I am the type of 'Marxist

> maggot' that the poster is threatening, and I'm

> very much anti-racist.

>

> However I take issue with the way in which

> Peckhamguy has seemingly been ganged up on and

> almost silenced by other posters. I am not for a

> minute taking his side in terms of his argument,

> however I'm taking his side as I think people have

> been rude to him. I've seen a couple of posts, for

> example, insulting his use of English, or just

> shouting him down in a way that isn't particularly

> constructive. I don't see how personal insults of

> right wingers do anything productive.



Are you for real? Are you genuinely saying we should be respectful of apologists for neo-nazi?s?



There?s a ridiculous idea that during online discussions one should always - without exception - ?play the ball, not the man.? The idea that a person may espouse any view whatsoever and be accorded respect for themselves despite what they say? Well it?s (to put it politely) absolute rubbish. Some stuff is too much.


He came on here and told us that a bunch of extremist white supremiscists were basically ok. Someone who does that just lost all privileges.

Jim1234 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't see how personal insults of

> right wingers do anything productive.


Indeed, but it's a bit insulting to ordinary Conservative supporters to lump them in with pro-Nazi types.

You're right that insults are an unhelpful and hasty response - though I would stand by my probably insulting post that anyone who can't see something wrong with that site has something wrong with them. It's not sane or right to go round painting swastikas on things, or making posters saying 'Paki rape gangs coming to your area' that appear to be promoting the idea of lynchings.


On the subject of silencing Peckhamguy, there are some viewpoints so repulsive they don't deserve to be listened to, and that site contains them. Peckhamguy announced that he saw nothing wrong - therefore we must surmise that he thinks they're right.


I think, given the content of the site, it's fair enough to say you wish to end all dialogue there. You're right: people should silence Peckhamguy politely. However, although anger and attack are not a good, cool response, given how horrible the site is, the anger is hardly surprising.

But I would also say that PeckhamGuy (like anyone else) has to take repsonsibility for what he writes. He could have responded by saying that he hadn't looked at the site properly but on a second viewing he could see the problems with it. But he didn't. Instead he choose to laugh at everyone with snowflake emojis.


The far right often use reported cases of criminal behaviour from individuals that come from the groups they seek to demonise to justify their hatred. The rational response is to counter that with reported cases where white Brits have engaged in criminal behaviour. The point being that all types of people are capable of heinous crime. PG seemed to argue that context and agenda does not matter in the selection of which cases to highlight on that site. That is either genuine stupidity, or deliberate trolling or an alignment with the views expressed by the site. That is the question PG seems reluctant to answer and it is perfectly ok for others to ask it.

Thanks for the responses all. I'm too lazy to respond to everyone individually, however I think pretty much every criticism of my point holds a lot of weight and I largely agree with you.


Regarding equating extreme right with 'moderate' right, not my intention at all, apologies.

Haha cheers some, and most of you on here are very funny people in this thread 😂 very hypercritical it?s unreal

All of your hateful comments have made my day my week even

Thumbs up to private education hey 👋😂

You mostly know nothing about the issue, study it check it out properly then come back

All so worried about my English that u r sadly blinded by the real life

Have a beautiful day

Snobbery is a big thing on here but gladly there are some straight headed people on here what knows what the real world is all about, the true working class who has never had nothing handed to them on a plate the ones who actually see the real world.

Protesting things that u don?t know harm u is a thing what loads of people are doing, because know one knows the true depths of things

Anyways I?m sure a lot of u have met up and had some meetings in your nearest Starbucks and had a long good chat about the matter ,hopefully things went rite for the latte liberals

Good day to you all and I truly mean that!

Yours sincerely PG

Ps those of u who have private messaged me because they are worried of getting involved in the pettiness thanks for doing so, but it is sad coz I know the only reason we spoke through that is because u did not want to be labelled nothing like me , but I truly love and respect the messages Nuff love! 🤘🏻😘

🥂👍👋💝🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Say what you like mate, but you still supported a neo-nazi website, and you?re still using a load of whataboutery to deflect from your own failings. You display the same faults that you accuse others of, but apparently it?s ok because you?re white working class and therefore more ?real? than anyone else, yeah? Twat.


The silent majority supports you eh? Yeah, right...

It's not snobbish to object to someone saying that a neo-nazi website that talks about killing Jews and "Pakis" etc is not a problem and all true. And flaunt your supposed working class credentials all you like, the working classes have always fought against fascism - certainly all my working class friends would despise everything you've said and would tell you so extremely forcefully.


"You mostly know nothing about the issue, study it check it out properly then come back" - you mean if we go and have a better look at the phrase "Zero tolerance for non-white races" we'll decide (as you clearly have done) that it's OK? Pillock.


You're either a rather tiresome troll or the nastiest piece of work in a five-mile radius, I wonder which?

sidebirds Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> "all my working class friends" -

>

> rather 'inclusive' of you !


I'm not really sure what that means - I assume it's some sort of dig? Just objecting to Peckhamguy's absurd statement that "the true working class who has never had nothing handed to them on a plate the ones who actually see the real world" would agree with him - plenty of my mates fit that description and don't think neo-nazis are OK.

I *#%^ing hate it when people flaunt ?working class? as some kind of moniker that signifies them to be somehow a ?purer?type of person, untainted by all that high falutin? education and so on.


It?s this repulsive idea that (to misquote someone else) ?my ignorance is the equal of your experience?, and it?s just a hop, skip and a jump away from the Khmer Rouge, frankly. Hyperbole? No, I don?t think so. This whole chip carried widely on the shoulder of some white working class people, that somehow their limited worldview (and it always is limited) is still a clearer view of how the world really is than those who have travelled, read and studied is dangerously frankly.


It?s an insidious kind of bigotry, one that discriminates against education, of all things, and derides any contrary viewpoint as somehow ?not real?. It?s an Orwellian level of contradiction that Peckhamguy is embracing.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I *#%^ing hate it when people flaunt ?working

> class? as some kind of moniker that signifies them

> to be somehow a ?purer?type of person, untainted

> by all that high falutin? education and so on.

>

> It?s this repulsive idea that (to misquote someone

> else) ?my ignorance is the equal of your

> experience?, and it?s just a hop, skip and a jump

> away from the Khmer Rouge, frankly. Hyperbole? No,

> I don?t think so. This whole chip carried widely

> on the shoulder of some white working class

> people, that somehow their limited worldview (and

> it always is limited) is still a clearer view of

> how the world really is than those who have

> travelled, read and studied is dangerously

> frankly.

>

> It?s an insidious kind of bigotry, one that

> discriminates against education, of all things,

> and derides any contrary viewpoint as somehow ?not

> real?. It?s an Orwellian level of contradiction

> that Peckhamguy is embracing.




would you like to join me for a "latte" and "nibbles" and we can discuss these "white working class people"? feel free to bring a clothes-peg for your nose.

  • Like 1

Got anything constructive to contribute sidebirds, or are you just bored and filling the time with a bit of (frankly low quality) trolling?


P.S. I don't speak for JoeLeg and have never met him, but I know he's a former serviceman so I suggest he probably has a lot more experience of the "real" workingclass than you - and nothing in what he's said suggests that he is in any way snobbish as you try to imply.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The is very low water pressure in the middle of Friern Road this morning.
    • I think mostly those are related to the same "issues". In my experience, it's difficult using the pin when reporting problems, especially if you're on a mobile... There's two obvious leaks in that stretch and has been for sometime one of them apparently being sewer flooding 😱  
    • BBC Homepage Skip to content Accessibility Help EFor you Notifications More menu Search BBC                     BBC News Menu   UK England N. Ireland Scotland Alba Wales Cymru Isle of Man Guernsey Jersey Local News Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told   Image source,Getty Images ByRichard Bilton, BBC Panorama and Ben Milne, BBC News Published 2 hours ago Vets have told BBC Panorama they feel under increasing pressure to make money for the big companies that employ them - and worry about the costly financial impact on pet owners. Prices charged by UK vets rose by 63% between 2016 and 2023, external, and the government's competition regulator has questioned whether the pet-care market - as it stands - is giving customers value for money. One anonymous vet, who works for the UK's largest vet care provider, IVC Evidensia, said that the company has introduced a new monitoring system that could encourage vets to offer pet owners costly tests and treatment options. A spokesperson for IVC told Panorama: "The group's vets and vet nurses never prioritise revenue or transaction value over and above the welfare of the animal in their care." More than half of all UK households are thought to own a pet, external. Over the past few months, hundreds of pet owners have contacted BBC Your Voice with concerns about vet bills. One person said they had paid £5,600 for 18 hours of vet-care for their pet: "I would have paid anything to save him but felt afterwards we had been taken advantage of." Another described how their dog had undergone numerous blood tests and scans: "At the end of the treatment we were none the wiser about her illness and we were presented with a bill of £13,000."   Image caption, UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024, according to the CMA Mounting concerns over whether pet owners are receiving a fair deal prompted a formal investigation by government watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). In a provisional report, external at the end of last year, it identified several issues: Whether vet companies are being transparent about the ownership of individual practices and whether pet owners have enough information about pricing The concentration of vet practices and clinics in the hands of six companies - these now control 60% of the UK's pet-care market Whether this concentration has led to less market competition and allowed some vet care companies to make excess profits 'Hitting targets' A vet, who leads one of IVC's surgeries (and who does not want to be identified because they fear they could lose their job), has shared a new internal document with Panorama. The document uses a colour code to compare the company's UK-wide tests and treatment options and states that it is intended to help staff improve clinical care. It lists key performance indicators in categories that include average sales per patient, X-rays, ultrasound and lab tests. The vet is worried about the new policy: "We will have meetings every month, where one of the area teams will ask you how many blood tests, X-rays and ultrasounds you're doing." If a category is marked in green on the chart, the clinic would be judged to be among the company's top 25% of achievers in the UK. A red mark, on the other hand, would mean the clinic was in the bottom 25%. If this happens, the vet says, it might be asked to come up with a plan of action. The vet says this would create pressure to "upsell" services. Panorama: Why are vet bills so high? Are people being priced out of pet ownership by soaring bills? Watch on BBC iPlayer now or BBC One at 20:00 on Monday 12 January (22:40 in Northern Ireland) Watch on iPlayer For instance, the vet says, under the new model, IVC would prefer any animal with suspected osteoarthritis to potentially be X-rayed. With sedation, that could add £700 to a bill. While X-rays are sometimes necessary, the vet says, the signs of osteoarthritis - the thickening of joints, for instance - could be obvious to an experienced vet, who might prefer to prescribe a less expensive anti-inflammatory treatment. "Vets shouldn't have pressure to do an X-ray because it would play into whether they are getting green on the care framework for their clinic." IVC has told Panorama it is extremely proud of the work its clinical teams do and the data it collects is to "identify and close gaps in care for our patients". It says its vets have "clinical independence", and that prioritising revenue over care would be against the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons' (RCVS) code and IVC policy. Vets say they are under pressure to bring in more money per pet   Published 15 April 2025 Vets should be made to publish prices, watchdog says   Published 15 October 2025 The vet says a drive to increase revenue is undermining his profession. Panorama spoke to more than 30 vets in total who are currently working, or have worked, for some of the large veterinary groups. One recalls being told that not enough blood tests were being taken: "We were pushed to do more. I hated opening emails." Another says that when their small practice was sold to a large company, "it was crazy... It was all about hitting targets". Not all the big companies set targets or monitor staff in this way. The high cost of treatment UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024 - equal to just over £365 per pet-owning household, according to the CMA. However, most pet owners in the UK do not have insurance, and bills can leave less-well-off families feeling helpless when treatment is needed. Many vets used not to display prices and pet owners often had no clear idea of what treatment would cost, but in the past two years that has improved, according to the CMA. Rob Jones has told Panorama that when his family dog, Betty, fell ill during the autumn of 2024 they took her to an emergency treatment centre, Vets Now, and she underwent an operation that cost almost £5,000. Twelve days later, Betty was still unwell, and Rob says he was advised that she could have a serious infection. He was told a diagnosis - and another operation - would cost between £5,000-£8,000.   Image caption, Betty's owners were told an operation on her would cost £12,000 However, on the morning of the operation, Rob was told this price had risen to £12,000. When he complained, he was quoted a new figure - £10,000. "That was the absolute point where I lost faith in them," he says. "It was like, I don't believe that you've got our interests or Betty's interests at heart." The family decided to put Betty to sleep. Rob did not know at the time that both his local vet, and the emergency centre, branded Vets Now, where Betty was treated, were both owned by the same company - IVC. He was happy with the treatment but complained about the sudden price increase and later received an apology from Vets Now. It offered him £3,755.59 as a "goodwill gesture".   Image caption, Rob Jones says he lost faith in the vets treating his pet dog Betty Vets Now told us its staff care passionately for the animals they treat: "In complex cases, prices can vary depending on what the vet discovers during a consultation, during the treatment, and depending on how the patient responds. "We have reviewed our processes and implemented a number of changes to ensure that conversations about pricing are as clear as possible." Value for money? Independent vet practices have been a popular acquisition for corporate investors in recent years, according to Dr David Reader from the University of Glasgow. He has made a detailed study of the industry. Pet care has been seen as attractive, he says, because of the opportunities "to find efficiencies, to consolidate, set up regional hubs, but also to maximise profits". Six large veterinary groups (sometimes referred to as LVGs) now control 60% of the UK pet care market - up from 10% a decade ago, according to the CMA, external. They are: Linnaeus, which owns 180 practices Medivet, which has 363 Vet Partners with 375 practices CVS Group, which has 387 practices Pets at Home, which has 445 practices under the name Vets for Pets IVC Evidensia, which has 900 practices When the CMA announced its provisional findings last autumn, it said there was not enough competition or informed choice in the market. It estimated the combined cost of this to UK pet owners amounted to £900m between 2020-2024. Corporate vets dispute the £900m figure. They say their prices are competitive and made freely available, and reflect their huge investment in the industry, not to mention rising costs, particularly of drugs. The corporate vets also say customers value their services highly and that they comply with the RCVS guidelines.   Image caption, A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with the service they receive from vets A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with their vets - both corporate and independent - when it comes to quality of service. But, with the exception of Pets at Home, customer satisfaction on cost is much lower for the big companies. "I think that large veterinary corporations, particularly where they're owned by private equity companies, are more concerned about profits than professionals who own veterinary businesses," says Suzy Hudson-Cooke from the British Veterinary Union, which is part of Unite. Proposals for change The CMA's final report on the vet industry is expected by the spring but no date has been set for publication. In its provisional report, it proposed improved transparency on pricing and vet ownership. Companies would have to reveal if vet practices were part of a chain, and whether they had business connections with hospitals, out-of-hours surgeries, online pharmacies and even crematoria. IVC, CVS and Vet Partners all have connected businesses and would have to be more transparent about their services in the future. Pets at Home does not buy practices - it works in partnership with individual vets, as does Medivet. These companies have consistently made clear in their branding who owns their practices. The big companies say they support moves to make the industry more transparent so long as they don't put too high a burden on vets. David Reader says the CMA proposals could have gone further. "There's good reason to think that once this investigation is concluded, some of the larger veterinary groups will continue with their acquisition strategies." The CMA says its proposals would "improve competition by helping pet owners choose the right vet, the right treatment, and the right way to buy medicine - without confusion or unnecessary cost". For Rob Jones, however, it is probably too late. "I honestly wouldn't get another pet," he says. "I think it's so expensive now and the risk financially is so great.             Food Terms of Use About the BBC Privacy Policy Cookies Accessibility Help Parental Guidance Contact the BBC Make an editorial complaint BBC emails for you Copyright © 2026 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
    • What does the area with the blue dotted lines and the crossed out water drop mean? No water in this area? So many leaks in the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...