Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Crikey a speed hump free side road in Southwark - do the Council know? Have a word with them - am sure they'd be happy to spend a load of cash putting in road humps on H&S grounds quick smart.


But do all cars really speed down Landcroft Mon238 - speed is, after all, relative. As has been posted here in the past, pedestrians' perception of speed is usually incorrect (see Barry Road discussions).


I suppose I just find it a bit sad that the council's stock response to any concern re speed is to install speed humps. I say this as someone who obeys the speed limit.

I hate speed humps with a great hatred, they ruin my car, reduce the life of my tyres and lorries which leap over them are putting cracks in my front garden wall. However - since they were installed there have been no accidents in my road involving children, and no speeding cars crashing into parked cars around my house - used to happen every 18 months or so, lost several wing mirrors, a car's rear bumper and my neighbour had a car ploughing into her front room.


So, on balance, much as I hate speed humps, they have actually improved things locally. They still have to be engineered right - but they do a job. Whether they are needed in quite such concentrations I don't know, some of the smaller cross routes are more hump than road now, but the principle seems sound enough.


I wish in the UK they would consider the French habit of putting a 'rapel' and the in-place speed limit on signs - regular reminders of 20 mph limits might encourage those using the roads to slow down - in long runs within a 20mph zone it's quite easy to forget (particularly I suspect if you are driving a stop-start delivery van) what the local prevaling limit is.

I think court lane bumps are worse than those at Dunstans. I live on Dunstans and have never thought they were a problem (except for when I park on one-parking on the hump can make you feel slightly disorientated from kerb). The only times I have heard scraping is when lorries and vans drive over them at over 30mph. In any case I couldn't face the road being dug up again!
  • 1 month later...

I also live on Dunstans Road, and whilst glad that the humps would be looked at, I would also like to ask if anything can be done to prevent heavy load vehicles using the road as a shortcut to P Rye?


The trucks/ lorries, and even coaches that crash down the road and over the speed humps actually make our house's foundations rock, not pleasant at all given that it should be a much quieter residential road. It would be great if there could be some measures in place to reduce this pressure on the road, particularly as Barry Rd is only a few roads away and much better placed to take the pressure of heavier vehicles.


Many thanks,


S

Hi ss18,

Apparently it is two humps out of thirteen. No details yet on which one's or by how much more than 100mm + tolerances they're out.

The more pronounced the humps the less attractive the route for lorries! So correcting these two faults wont help. The only effective way to is to block the road or width restrictions. Both would take some arranging. Width restrictions tend to cause a lot of noise - reversing lorries etc. Blocking the road we'd need to consider where.

But the very frst step would be any traffic count data - let me see what Southwark has in its records and if any recent automatic count data and come back here with it.

  • 4 weeks later...

Renata,


Do you believe what you have been told?


I regularly pass down Dunstans road and have not seen any works being done. I have not noticed any changes to the heights or spotted any new tarmac.


Has anyone any first hand evidence that this work has actually been done?


Graham

hello,

I live on dunstans road Nr goodrich/library side and they were definitely drilling and doing works on the road a few weeks ago. I don't have a car so was not paying attention to what they were doing exactly. The road was closed though for a weekend.

Hope that helps

Giacomelli

No James, I posted (page 2 of this thread):


To update on this, the results of the survey showed that some of the bumps were too high. These will require reconstruction. I will update here when I receive notification of the timetable from council officers.

Renata



you posted


James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi ss18,

> Apparently it is two humps out of thirteen. No

> details yet on which one's or by how much more

> than 100mm + tolerances they're out.

> The more pronounced the humps the less attractive

> the route for lorries! So correcting these two

> faults wont help. The only effective way to is to

> block the road or width restrictions. Both would

> take some arranging. Width restrictions tend to

> cause a lot of noise - reversing lorries etc.

> Blocking the road we'd need to consider where.

> But the very frst step would be any traffic count

> data - let me see what Southwark has in its

> records and if any recent automatic count data and

> come back here with it.



The main thing is that soon we will be at the end of this saga and Dunstan's Rd will have humps that meet the regulations

Renata:))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...