Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2wans Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Since you have so much time on your hands, Sue,

> why don't you google search that.



I'm ill in bed, that's why I "have so much time on my hands".


Why don't you just explain, since you used the expression and I don't think it sounds very nice.


ETA: I have googled it, and it's as I thought, so perhaps you could explain why you used it.

'Limp-wristed' used, like 'confirmed bachelor' to be a shorthand for 'homosexual'. The latter was used more in obituaries, the former in insults. It isn't a nice term. It goes with 'pansy' and 'nancy-boy'. Not to mention 'fairy'. It only goes with 'Liberal Democrat' if you belong to the far right, in general.


Amended to add - or, curiously, the hard left, although in my experience it is the Marxist-Leninist/ Stalinist tendency rather than the Trots who exhibit most puritanical homophobia.

Sue, you are, at the very least, 25 years older than me, but I did not have you down as a degenerate... quite yet.


An UNMANLY knock. A loose, quiet knock has been heard, by the hour. You obviously have nothing useful to add to this thread, & it seems you spend most of your life in bed, as you're on these forums 24/7. Go get some fresh air. It'll do you some good.

I once heard a father berating his son for holding his hand out palm down - "No real man does that - hold it palm up"

I wasn't impressed,let him hold his hand how he wants, but I'm not his father LOL


Anyway Lib Dems are making some big gains at a local level - big percentage swings.

2wans, one may not be a Lib Dem supporter (I'm not) but describing party members as "limp wristed" is homophobic. If you want to criticise them (and there's plenty to criticise), then do so in a constructive way. In addition describing MB contributors as "degenerate" is not on. If you want to insult people, then Twitter would be a better forum for you.

Telling me how "homophobic" I am says more about you than it does about me. I certainly wasn't thinking homophobic when I used the word limp wristed to describe a poor sounding knock. This forum is toxic, thanks to those who spend their lives on it, jumping at any opportunity to take down anyone with an opinion. So no, Alan Medic, you would be wrong to think I ever was apart of such a forum. I've only ever viewed without an account.


I'm young, have studied & work in the art industry. 95% of my friends ARE gay. For all anyone on this forums knows, I could have well been gay, but I am not.


Thanks for the feedback.

2wans Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, you are, at the very least, 25 years older

> than me, but I did not have you down as a

> degenerate... quite yet.

>

> An UNMANLY knock. A loose, quiet knock has been

> heard, by the hour. You obviously have nothing

> useful to add to this thread, & it seems you spend

> most of your life in bed, as you're on these

> forums 24/7. Go get some fresh air. It'll do you

> some good.



What a charming post.


And so new to the forum, too.


ETA: And what exactly is "UNMANLY", anyway?


How would you describe your apparently preferred "MANLY" knock? Do "Real Men" only knock strong and hard and with a wrist that is whatever the opposite of limp is?


Do women not campaign these days?


Maybe the knocker was knocking gently so as not to wake any sleeping children?


And WTF is it to you what I do with my time and how often I post on this forum? I presently have what appears to be flu, and even if I didn't have, so what? I live locally, it's a local forum and I have every right to post on it as much as I like.


If you don't like the content or frequency of my posts, you can find another forum to spend your own important time on.

We had some Labour party muppets door knock and they somehow didn't understand 'we don't have time to answer as we are heading out and could you please not come back as we aren't going to be influenced by door knockers regardless of party'. Four hours later the same chap turned up and knocked on the door and had totally forgotten that we had told him this. sounds like a politician in the making - agrees to a promise and then reneges

Dom Johnston Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Limp wristed knock or limp wristed handshake

> generally describes a lack of confidence rather

> than someones sexual orientation. It's one of the

> first things people are ever taught about

> interviewing, a firm handshake exudes

> confidence...



I totally agree a handshake like a wet fish is not pleasant to receive.


However as noted above, the expression "limp wristed" is generally used not to denote a lack of confidence but to denote somebody with what could be described as effeminate characteristics, or as the OP would have it, "unmanly".

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dom Johnston Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Limp wristed knock or limp wristed handshake

> > generally describes a lack of confidence rather

> > than someones sexual orientation. It's one of

> the

> > first things people are ever taught about

> > interviewing, a firm handshake exudes

> > confidence...

>

>

> I totally agree a handshake like a wet fish is not

> pleasant to receive.

>

> However as noted above, the expression "limp

> wristed" is generally used not to denote a lack of

> confidence but to denote somebody with what could

> be described as effeminate characteristics, or as

> the OP would have it, "unmanly".



"Limp wristed is/was a euphemism as described by P68 during less enlightened times" - nxjen


... probably time to ditch your dusty old book of euphemisms, Sue.


If I ever used the word "limp wristed" infront of my friends, it has gone straight over their heads.


2018, just saying!



Thank you so much for clearing that up, Dom.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've never known 'limp-wristed' is supposed to be

> a homophobic term.

> I always took it to mean someone who acts a bit

> weak/no vigour or gumption.


I remember when if you held your hand that way up as you walked with the fingers drooping down - it supposedly signified you were gay (1980s maybe). There were loads of other little mannerisms then too - actually we were obsessed then.

Sometimes little things need to be picked up on, because if they are not they become acceptable.


If that leads to a slanging match, then that is regrettable.


Better that than pretending it doesn't matter, in my opinion.


So-called "limp wristed" people are part of the community too. Aren't they?


It's the tacit acceptance of this kind of language that gets kids bullied at school for being "different", and not how the other kids think they should be.


I personally think it is worthwhile to point this out. I'm sorry you find it embarrassing.

Sue, you do understand that limp is a word with a whole meaning of its own, right?


If I had written a "limp knock", rather than a "limp-wristed" knock,

you probably wouldn't have jumped to the conclusion that I was being homophobic, correct?


I'm just destroying brain cells at this point by reading your messages. Take LIMP for what it means. It was, by every definition of the word LIMP, a limp wristed knock. End of discussion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We went in for a quote for our tiny bathroom and they said it would cost £8-10k for off the shelf items and installation.   We looked around and found https://thehousemartin.co/about He did the work for less than 5k, including plastering, carpentry of a custom cabinet, plumbing, painting and tiling. The quality of finished work was very high so we can't recommend him highly enough, the only additional cost to us was purchasing the fixtures.
    • I thought it was lovely, thank you for sharing 😊
    • They are very good
    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...