Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is where you can nominate someone for starting a thread that is too silly for your liking or just simply annoys you. The nomination has to be seconded and when it is the poster shall have a self imposed 24 hour ban from posting. Of course they might ignore this but we'll deal with that when it happens.


Anyone, I'd like to nominate Karter for his Pizza thread. Just how many threads about sauces does this forum need? Admittedly Karter it could have been any one of a number. You just got unlucky. Too many silly threads relegate some could be interesting ones to obscurity before their time.


Anyone second this nomination?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18722-the-naughty-room/
Share on other sites

Cannot believe that the creator of the thread-muddying, OP-distracting, train-of-thought-destroying, LM pleasing and logic-defying 73 game has posted here.


I realise that 'Less is More' has probably been on your mind for a while Doc but to start that doomed thread with the frankly 'Micklewrightian' "Okay guys?" and leave it at that is, quite apart from being simply lazy, the sort of itch that, once scratched, leaves a blemish that stains the page and does to other threads exactly what you accuse others of here - Too many silly threads relegate some could be interesting ones to obscurity before their time.


J'accuse!

Maxxi, you are nominating me for a different thread so I'm not gone yet. This thread could herald the dawn of a new self governing era for public forums like this. Think about it. No more silly mods pushing their weight about once they get the sniff of a little authority. Power to the people! Don't knock it.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd like to nominate Frankie for starting a thread

> about something keeping him awake. One that was

> sooooo uninteresting that no one even posted

> there. Anyone second that?



I second that


( I haven't even read it )


* goes to read post *

Can I talk about you?


Are you open to bribes? Working in accounts, aren't they all....?


On a serious note, your new theead, you MUST blow the whistle or at least present the evidence to an impartial third party, you wouldn't want to be scape-goated. And if you are leaving what have you to lose. Morally, well, it's quite obvious...


Let me out now as that was bloody good!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...