Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is where you can nominate someone for starting a thread that is too silly for your liking or just simply annoys you. The nomination has to be seconded and when it is the poster shall have a self imposed 24 hour ban from posting. Of course they might ignore this but we'll deal with that when it happens.


Anyone, I'd like to nominate Karter for his Pizza thread. Just how many threads about sauces does this forum need? Admittedly Karter it could have been any one of a number. You just got unlucky. Too many silly threads relegate some could be interesting ones to obscurity before their time.


Anyone second this nomination?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18722-the-naughty-room/
Share on other sites

Cannot believe that the creator of the thread-muddying, OP-distracting, train-of-thought-destroying, LM pleasing and logic-defying 73 game has posted here.


I realise that 'Less is More' has probably been on your mind for a while Doc but to start that doomed thread with the frankly 'Micklewrightian' "Okay guys?" and leave it at that is, quite apart from being simply lazy, the sort of itch that, once scratched, leaves a blemish that stains the page and does to other threads exactly what you accuse others of here - Too many silly threads relegate some could be interesting ones to obscurity before their time.


J'accuse!

Maxxi, you are nominating me for a different thread so I'm not gone yet. This thread could herald the dawn of a new self governing era for public forums like this. Think about it. No more silly mods pushing their weight about once they get the sniff of a little authority. Power to the people! Don't knock it.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd like to nominate Frankie for starting a thread

> about something keeping him awake. One that was

> sooooo uninteresting that no one even posted

> there. Anyone second that?



I second that


( I haven't even read it )


* goes to read post *

Can I talk about you?


Are you open to bribes? Working in accounts, aren't they all....?


On a serious note, your new theead, you MUST blow the whistle or at least present the evidence to an impartial third party, you wouldn't want to be scape-goated. And if you are leaving what have you to lose. Morally, well, it's quite obvious...


Let me out now as that was bloody good!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...