Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think it's just one step at a time Loz - although I don't really think the two things are on a par in terms of diverting your attention.


I've seen people in cars completely blind to the outside world because they're remonstrating with someone on the phone. I've never seen a cigarette have the same effect.


Frankly, despite being a smoker, I have no idea how people can smoke in cars at all!!

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How it illegal to use a mobile phone while

> driving, but not illegal to have a burning stick

> of tobacco in your hand??



OBVIOUSLY the in use smoking hand is already taken up. So it makes sense NOT to occupy the spare hand with a communication device.


The law makers are pretty clever sometimes.


NETTE(td)

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I've seen people in cars completely blind to the

> outside world because they're remonstrating with

> someone on the phone. I've never seen a cigarette

> have the same effect.


Drop both in your lap and see which one diverts your attention more!

Tarot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How comes its against the law not to belt up in a

> car,yet hundreds of people every day are

> travelling standing up in

> cramped trains and buses ?.

> Double standards where money,s involved.


I'd get this one off to Viz pronto if I was you T.


Just have the final line read 'It's one law for the likes of them Stagecoach gadgies and another for the rest of us'.


I reckon you'll get a pencil for that.

We all have flaws Strafer.I gather you have not been thrown while standing on a crowded bus driven by a physcho driver,

or stood next to a unwashed oink on a train all squashed together.

Of course its logical to wear a safety belt in a car,and you could be fined without one,but the concern for safety does

not apply to commuters.

Frankito bad boy ,Ill see you in the playground by the naughty room.

Tarot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How comes its against the law not to belt up in a

> car,yet hundreds of people every day are

> travelling standing up in

> cramped trains and buses ?.

> Double standards where money,s involved.


Its not 'hundreds of people' its millions and therefore would be impractical and impossible to police.

Tarot. I've been in all of those situations. Sorry. Still don't see your logic


Double decker trains are great but how typical of you to adopt the martyr "we are not worthy" position and ignore the fact that this country has a different topology. Have you never noticed just how many low bridges there are on the rail networks?

Having a Cigarette whilst driving is dangerous.


You first need to locate your ciggies..


Then a method to light it.


Matches.... Lighter.... ??


Car lighter ... press .. wait to warm up... retract from holder... light cigarette... replace in holder..


Requires manoverours similar to tuning radio.. as you have to take your eyes off the road...


A work mate of mine a few years back drove into the back of another car whilst selecting a sweet

from the passengers seat. Just a second of distraction...


Fox

I think StraferJack is right, the number of low bridges and tunnels would rule out double decker trains. Actually I have been on a couple of double decker trains in Europe - there were no seatbelts, and some passengers still had to stand.


As others have said, there are relatively few train accidents compared with car crashes, it is an inherently safer way to travel. And buses usually travel at low speed (but coaches have to have seatbelts fitted).

Are we really indulging this?


How come we are forced to sit through tedious safety demonstrations on flights, but I notice birds taking off all the time without so much as a health and safety certificate...I mean it's one rule for them and another for us....it's about oil I tell ya!!

Just to go OT slightly, this morning on the 12 bus this gadgey and a lollygagger were talking.

The gadgey told the lollygagger that the bendy 12s were on their out by Xmas and the 436s would folllow in quick smart order.


His source was an unnamed 'friend' at Camberwell garage, who could well be the worst sort of yegg for all I know.


Can anyone verify whether this is the case or should I just stop listening to nogoodniks on the buses?

I bet your kids dont get sweets off of you Mockney, low tolerance level.

Strafer I must admit I never thought of bridges being short I dont travel by train a lot,but think of the work created if they could start building bigger ones.

I hate commuting on trains, never works out well, and I,m mainly a miserable martyr with a touch of the Jack Dees.

Frankito I havent got outside yet Hughnots banned the sweets, and Mockneys put me in a padded room:X

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...