Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi my son will be starting school in September in reception but I wanted to seek out some opinion on booking holidays in term time, what are local Southwark East Dulwich schools view on this? Is it something that isn?t ideal but accept that an odd holiday is ok? Or is it really frowned upon?

As my son is only in reception I figured we might have another year before it gets more serious - and we would probably stick to school holidays.

Really wondering what other parents did and how accepted it is?

I think Southwark and most schools are much tougher now than before. The guidance changed to only authorising absence in 'exceptional circumstances' (in about 2013?) and Southwark also decided fairly recently to implement the penalty notice regime (not sure exactly when but they did not adopt it immediately). In practice because schools have to record absences it's easier for them just to say no to pretty much every request, and then record any absence as unauthorised - then it becomes largely the local authority's problem.


These days I think it's safest to assume that any request for absence for a holiday will be refused and there's a risk you'll get a penalty notice - I have no idea how efficient and how tough Southwark are in reality, but the policy is here and is pretty blunt:


https://www.southwark.gov.uk/schools-and-education/information-for-parents/behaviour-attendance-and-truancy/penalty-notices-for-irregular-attendance-and-term-time-leave

I've never done it but my feeling is that teachers really hate it because while you have been off having a lovely holiday, they then have to work hard to catch your child up upon their return. Not sure how this would affect such a young age group though. Personally I would have a quiet word with the school.
I was a teacher for over 40 years and don?t think term time holidays are acceptable. However young a child is they will miss out n a lot of learning. How would parents feel if their child?s school sent a letter home saying that the teacher will not be in for the next couple of weeks as he/she has decided to book a cheap holiday in term time?

I think before your child is 5 they are not legally required to be at school so they can't fine you.


Lots of people at our school have done it, mainly because they have immediate family living in far-flung places, and sometimes the best times of year to visit are Easter and Christmas when we get only 2 weeks' holidays.


We took my kids out last Easter for exactly this reason, it was also my sister's wedding, but the leave wasn't approved. I did offer take work with us but heard nothing. Mine are primary age so I know it's more problematic when they enter secondary school. I think our school has now starting referring unapproved absences to the LA and they then fine each parent for the absence.

This is usually not a problem if your child hasn't yet turned 5. Until a few years ago, start of reception varied a lot depending on the local authority. In some authorities there were three dates of entry, the summer born children started after the Easter break.

Renata

Renata Hamvas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is usually not a problem if your child hasn't

> yet turned 5. Until a few years ago, start of

> reception varied a lot depending on the local

> authority. In some authorities there were three

> dates of entry, the summer born children started

> after the Easter break.

> Renata


But this doesn't apply now e.g. three dates of entry.


If a parent is lucky enough to secure a reception place for their child in a Southwark school that's great and they shouldn't flout the rules.

hammerman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Renata Hamvas Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > This is usually not a problem if your child

> hasn't

> > yet turned 5. Until a few years ago, start of

> > reception varied a lot depending on the local

> > authority. In some authorities there were three

> > dates of entry, the summer born children

> started

> > after the Easter break.

> > Renata

>

> But this doesn't apply now e.g. three dates of

> entry.

>

> If a parent is lucky enough to secure a reception

> place for their child in a Southwark school that's

> great and they shouldn't flout the rules.



But the rules are your child doesn't officially have to be in school until the term after they turn five, so no legal repercussions of taking a term time holiday in reception before then.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...