Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Most cyclists are probably as safe as most truckers or car drivers, with a small minority who are reckless. But those reckless minority have a lot less potential to cause injury and damage than the reckless truckers or drivers (see carnage caused on M25 yesterday as an example).


Is it more fun to come up with silly generalisations than it is to use well thought out argument?


And why do we continually see threads on this forum about dangerous cyclists but never about dangerous drivers? Is it because we are so used to seeing dangerous or stupid driving that it doesn't merit comment?

I can think of at least two examples of ridiculous and dangerous driving I encountered yesterday while out in the car...but they are probably too dull and everyday to discuss.

I wear a Helmet...


To friggin right. Other road uses take you serious if you look like you mean business.


I also wear all black full on cycling gear and ride a black bike. Add to that a bright green high viz top and a black and highly reflective courier bag. Flashing red & white LED lights as well.


I look like a cross between a copper & a christmas tree & if you can't see me coming, then god help.


However, earlier this year I was passing a couple of stopped buses, when someone ran out between the gap without looking. I was at full pelt. (I'm solid built & weigh nearly 90KG and I ride quickly)


I saw him briefly but still hit him square, knocking him up into the air and into the oncoming traffic lane. Thankfully the cars were moving slowly and could stop ,he was also fairly lightly built.

When he got up he had obviously hit his face and head against my helmet. He was dazed for sure but I reckon it saved us both, spreading the load of the impact. If my unprotected head had hit his, at that speed, I think it might have done us both.


So a helmet I reckon, does more than protect only me.


I also look pretty damn georgeous in it too, with my dark locks flowing in the wind. ( really, I do ;-))



Anyway, I read that councillors twitter page. What a twit he is.


NETTE:))

Cyclists are murderous. But only at night. There's a conspiracy. It's all organized. They come at you from all directions of the compass, congregating on likely victims identified with night-vision goggles and an attack coordinated by text messages ends in some poor random pedestrian being run over multiple times often with spiked bicycle wheels. Not a pretty sight.
Just for the record, Dan Garfield's twitter comments were in jest, in an exchange with a friend. That friend is the cyclist that he refers to. Sometimes it helps to look at things in their true context before piliorying an innocent comment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So that suggests the consultations with 'community' are just a tick box exercise where information given cannot be relied on. Not a good look. I hope Renata Hamvas who is the local councillor, as well as licensing, finds a way to stop the wholesale, spreadingmonetisation of an important green space in summer. If they get this it'll end up like Brockwell Park before you know it.
    • I’m broadly in agreement with you, Dogkennelhillbilly. But why the meme? It’s a very unfair representation of Sean Dyche, a man who to my knowledge has never engaged in any culture war bollocks. From his Wikipedia entry: Dyche features in an internet meme criticising modern trends in football, in which the phrase "utter woke nonsense" is attributed to him; he said "I wish I'd copyrighted it. Considering I didn’t actually say it, it does follow me around".
    • Whisky Macs, like Harvey's Bristol Cream and Cinzano Bianco & lemonade, are a taste of Christmas past sadly lost to many. A little Whisky Mac and icing sugar whisked through whipping cream makes a festive accompaniment to stollen or Christmas pudding.
    • Legal matters are notoriously slow.  There is no rule that communication has to be via email, fax or letter. If the issue is that you want to claim damages to the property because of poor practice, you would have to lodge a complaint with the ombudsman, but surely the one to suffer the most is the “gold digger” beneficiary?    If that is not the wrong that needs righting, what is? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...