Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is not directly relevant but quite interesting:


Total deaths in police custody or otherwise following contact with the police, England & Wales 1990-date

Type Metropolitan Police Other forces Total

Custody 248 689 937

Pursuit 32 278 310

RTI 19 90 109

Shooting 20 32 52

All deaths 319 1089 1408



Source: http://inquest.gn.apc.org/website/statistics/deaths-in-police-custody

That data is a bit misrepresentative, and one might say inflammatory?


This is a better way of presenting the data which demonstrates a police force making incredible inroads into effectively managing incidents:


http://inquest.gn.apc.org/graphs/deaths_in_police_custody.gif


In fact deaths in police custody are lower now than as far back as the records go.


This isn't going to become a thread where people make inflamatory claims and others have to set them right is it?

No Lady Delilah, that's crazy.


You've deliberately chosen shootings where the figures are so small they are meaningless.


Those figures are just about the criminals, not about police behvaiour or policy.


Why are you deliberately trying to inflame the situation and make misleading claims?

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So, because one arsehole policeman got heavy

> handed at a protest, and someone lost their life,

> ALL police just be thugs.

>

> I assume then that you believe ALL black boys a

> knife carrying thugs, and ALL footy fans like a

> fight, and ALL scoucers are thieves?



i think it takes a specil type of personn to be a policeman and that poersonn is likly to be a thug

Not true at at Richardbach. What a stupid thing to say.


I'm not the biggest fan of police myself and I do think some are in way too much for the power but I wouldn't call them thugs at all. There are some decent ones out there. I have no sympathy for a drug dealing gun toting idiot.

One of my good pals is a police officer, and through him, I've met qite a few. I admit, that for the most part, they're not my kind of people, and some of them are just plain thick. A couple have even said "I'm in it for the action, which made me laugh.


However, that doesn't mean that they're all blood thirsty nut jobs who can't wait to gun people down, or beat them to death in a cell.


I'm not a big fan of the police, I don't like how they do a lot of things, and I believe that they watch out for each other, and cover things up. HOWEVER, I don't think they're rotten to the core, and I suspect that when the details of this incident come out, they will show that they had little choice but to put this guy down.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SpaghettiSue40 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Now you are both being silly, but surely there

> > must be an instant 'bullet' that isnt fatal.

> Any

> > scientists or inventors out there?

>

> In Australia they are working on a rifle that

> fires a venomous snake at speed. In tests the

> snake will bite the target 99 out of 100 times.

> Once incapaciated, which takes a couple of

> seconds, the aggressor can be given the antidote

> to the snake's poison to ensure death does not

> occur. It should be in use soon.

> BTW No harm comes to the creature



Ah yes the Viper Sniper, often used in conjunction with the Quokka Stoppa, a bazooka-like weapon which fires this small marsupial at locked doors etc. to gain entry.

richardbach Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So, because one arsehole policeman got heavy

> > handed at a protest, and someone lost their

> life,

> > ALL police just be thugs.

> >

> > I assume then that you believe ALL black boys a

> > knife carrying thugs, and ALL footy fans like a

> > fight, and ALL scoucers are thieves?

>

>

> i think it takes a specil type of personn to be a

> policeman and that poersonn is likly to be a thug


Richard, I'm sure that's not your name as you can't spell. Is it Ratbag?

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Death by shooting doesn't seem to have gone down

> though.

>

> http://inquest.gn.apc.org/website/graphs/police_sh

> ootings.gif


You are kidding, right.


I live five months of the year in North America those statistics would represent a very small town in Iowa.

Don't get me started.


Gastric infection, lactose intolerance all serve to make the average North Londoner highly irritable.


Despite boycotts of retailers selling non-aged cheese, there's a massive and violent underground network controlling supplies and milking the profits.


Profits are so large that they've been known to be worth killing for... It's a powder keg I tell you.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't get me started.

>

> Gastric infection, lactose intolerance all serve

> to make the average North Londoner highly

> irritable.

>

> Despite boycotts of retailers selling non-aged

> cheese, there's a massive and violent underground

> network controlling supplies and milking the

> profits.

>


Which they presumably make into the highly sought after but illegal 'conflict cheese'.

At the end of the day a bad man on London's street has been taken off them after being found in possession of a gun.


1) why has he got a gun?

2) what's he intending to do with it?


Whatever happens, hats off to the police officer that made that decision to fire. If it wasn't for these brave cops people like Gangster Mark Duggan would be walking around the streets causing pain and grief to other families with the gun he carries.


Even if he didn't fire first and pointed the gun at the officers they are well within all their rights to pull the trigger and shoot him. "Common Law" - Sect 3 Criminal Law Act

You cant expect an armed cop to wait around all day telling an armed and dangerous man to put the gun down while it is pointing at him.

At the end of the day the officers have the right to go home to there families etc like the rest of us after doing our job.


I feel whatever the police do they are always blamed in one way and never really praised. Incidents were armed criminals are taken of the streets occur daily by our armed police and only in a few cases are shots fired. When was the last one...2008 was it in Chelsea. 3 years with no deaths!


Next we will being moaning about our soldiers firing at the Taliban and killing them. It's exactly the same. if they point an Ak47 at you, you will want the soldier to pull the trigger first and kill them before he dies!


Also lets not have any more stupid questions about why police didn't shoot him in the leg, arm etc....Grow up.


Live by the sword die by sword!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...