Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do

> think additional residential accommodation locally

> would be a good thing. I had not realised the Lib

> Dem position was so entrenched against increasing

> housing capacity in Southwark, but then , you

> lives and you learns.


It's fine to increase housing where there's room for it, but it should not be at the expense of services, retail space, open areas or the character of the area. Many of us choose to live round here because it is quieter and easier to move around than places like Brixton or Camberwell. Turning the area into a mass of housing will ruin that, not to mention the fact that we already have too few doctors for the population, meaning it takes ages to get an appointment.

but it should not be at the expense of services, retail space, open areas or the character of the area.


The proposal was for flats on top of retail space, not instead of. The existing building is not single story. The character of LL is mixed retail, business and residential, with restaurants and pubs. We need housing in London.

  • 2 weeks later...
Tried attaching agent details - you can find them searching Jenkins Law, property search, Dulwich - advertised as a planning class A3 (catering) opportunity, subject to Southwark BC consent - asking rent ?125,000 per annum, exclusive of business rates and service-charge - too big a shop and rent for most local traders - might appeal to multiple fashion akin to White Stuff, Oliver Bonas etc - too small for small-format grocery brands (Tesco Metro, Sainsbury Central etc) and already covered by M&S, Co-op, Tesco Express etc - Londis and Budgens both operated formerly by Booker, bought-out by Tesco Q1 2017 - most demand likely from catering brands at this size, location and rent - some start-up potential but most likely established casual dining multiple operator akin to Honest Burger, Meat Liquor etcr. Do we, as local residents, need another chain restaurant? A moot point and sure to generate strong views but it is fair to say as typical high streets go across suburban London at this moment, LL is among the most affluent and vibrant. Which is best? - a thriving local economy bringing jobs and outside visitors, particularly in the evening, or the same old blend of betting shops, fried chicken outlets, estate agents, newsagents, hair salons etc?

Why would outside visitors want to come to ED? Transport isn?t great, and it?s too out of the way. People who want a go to destination experience go to Brixton, Clapham, even Peckham. Way better connected.


You also need to look at the demographic. The area had a resident population before the foodies arrived. Not everyone wants restaurants on the high street. A huge chunk of local residents want something useable. Yet another restaurant is not healthy.


Louisa.

There would be a positive correlation between increase in number of residents and increase in number of food outlets/ restaurants....I see there is going to be a M and S Simply Food opening up on the new development next to ED station as depicted on their hoarding.

Given that every house sized plot is being turned into umpteen rabbit hutches then this is to be expected.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...