Jump to content

Recommended Posts

edresi - I don't think Brendan was seriously engaging with those previous posts. For good reason.


Anyway, I have just heard news on the radio and apparently some council has decided to evict tenants as their son was convicted of taking part in the riots/looting. Don't know any more than that.

So when you stop immigrants coming in, presumably you will stop indigenous people leaving the country too? Fairs fair and all that


But oops.. That means more people to find jobs for again! Damn. Still, at least they will be British people right?' that's the main thing... Once we achieve that we can be satisfied?


Twats

There's definitely a gap in the available labour force and jobs.....and yes, opened ended immigration doesn't help that situation to improve. The result is of course competition for jobs and sadly too many people can not compete. The unemployment figures are disproportionate for those under 24 and those over 45-50. It is easy to say these people won't take jobs but that's not my experience of most of the unemployed I know in those groups. They want jobs, apprenticeships, something that gives them prospects. It's not true to say they are all too fussy either. The fact is that employers do employ prejudice because of age, experience, cost, time unemployed and so on.


Another problem that I think has impacted greatly on younger generations is the lack of manual skilled jobs. Everything today requires some level of academic qualification and not all youngsters are cut out for that. When we still had skilled manual jobs, made things etc, a kid could start an apprenticeship aged 14. He learned on the job and wasn't required to go to college and pass exams. He could work his way up into a good job in time and he could see that he could achieve that with time and hard work. A lot of the young people that are so called 'un-employable' fall into that catagory, and our economy has no answers for them.

Such an odd conversation, its like a little cabal of white pure born brits making sense to only themselves. No wonder the windows went in, as they just probed your lines, it will definitely be gooks in the wire next time.
Its not rocket science, its really simple. Some 'immigrants' take all the jobs, the others take all the benefits. What we want is British jobs for British people, any 'immigrant' rioters we can just revoke their citizenship,I mean,...er.... their immigrations status..... after all, dog stable etc etc etc...
I blame Europe. They can just walk in over the border and get a house and now the workplace smells of potcheen and baklava. Consequently an entire generation are only ever going to get to commit the type of theft that isn?t legitimised though institutional corruption or industry practices.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway, I have just heard news on the radio and

> apparently some council has decided to evict

> tenants as their son was convicted of taking part

> in the riots/looting. Don't know any more than

> that.


Will be interested to see what grounds they use for pursuing that, and if there is already a prior history of ASB. Can't see it succeeding if there are no previous ASB orders in place though.

Immigration is a red herring. What we need is a higher proportion of jobs to the available labour force than we have at the moment. And more importantly we need good jobs, that people might want to do for more than a few months.

"Immigration is a red herring. What we need is a higher proportion of jobs to the available labour force than we have at the moment. And more importantly we need good jobs, that people might want to do for"


This. Times 100


Oh and noodle hats? I'm not Brits bs, I'm an immigrant. And I'm calling you out as suspiciously familiar

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...