Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1.Man Utd

2.Arse

3.Chelsea

4. Spurs

5.Citeh

6.Villa

7.Pool


I'd fancy L'Arse more if they weren't continually undone by their curious desire to pass the ball into the net when smashing the odd one from 20 yards would probably secure them the title. Still, Chelsea and Arsenal are everything that's wrong with football these days, so their mutual failure is also rather enjoyable.


Bottom 3 anyone?


I'll have Burnley, Hull and Portsmouth. All crap.

Had we not been so unfortunate with injuries this season and had our owners not bled the club dry of any profit made over the summer from the sale of players, I believe we would have been in the mix for the league. We have been royally fucked over by Gillett and Hicks and it will only get worse.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Had we not been so unfortunate with injuries this

> season and had our owners not bled the club dry of

> any profit made over the summer from the sale of

> players, I believe we would have been in the mix

> for the league. We have been royally @#$%& over by

> Gillett and Hicks and it will only get worse.


Plus, and I quote John Motson on the raido last night, Rafa Benitez isn't the full ticket.

Rambo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 1.Man Utd

> 2.Arse

> 3.Chelsea

> 4. Spurs

> 5.Citeh

> 6.Villa

> 7.Pool

>

> I'd fancy L'Arse more if they weren't continually

> undone by their curious desire to pass the ball

> into the net when smashing the odd one from 20

> yards would probably secure them the title.

> Still, Chelsea and Arsenal are everything that's

> wrong with football these days, so their mutual

> failure is also rather enjoyable.

>

> Bottom 3 anyone?

>

> I'll have Burnley, Hull and Portsmouth. All crap


_______________________________________________________


He's a...


..charmer is our Rambo


Poor kid must need a hug


Where's "ianeasy" when you need him ?


Breathe deep & " in with anger , out with love"


Arsenal to nick it though



W**F

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well Motty is entitled to his opinion as are you.


77 new players since he started the job, 47 of which have left the club and two trophies won on penalties. Not the record of a great Liverpool manager Anna, even you must admit that?

Right Manager Wrong Owners


This article sums it up perfectly for me. If you can be arsed to read it you might begin to understand how I feel rather basing your opinions on incorrect figures that are thrown about in the tabloid press, which everyone seems to take as gospel.


SP - of the numbers you've quoted, whats your source? Please can you also tell me if all of the "47" he sold were his buys?


Really wish I'd not bothered coming back on here as all you all do is piss me off. Seems to be most people's objectives within this thread.

>

> __________________________________________________

> _____

>

> He's a...

>

> ..charmer is our Rambo

>

> Poor kid must need a hug

>

> Where's "ianeasy" when you need him ?

>

> Breathe deep & " in with anger , out with love"

>

> Arsenal to nick it though

>

>

> W**F



That's just my opinion of course, Woof. I'm not saying they don't play good football, just that Wenger's irritating habit of over-elaborating and not bringing through any young English players is a real blight on the game.


A hug would also be great thanks.

Breakdown here of ins and outs since he became manager - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1221975/Rafa-Benitezs-229m-spending-spree-The-76-players-signed-Liverpool-managers-reign.html leading to as at a year ago Liverpool having 62 players in their first team squad http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/mar/29/premier-league-huge-squads


I've got no axe to grind but given that much business if he hasn't built a squad who are contenders by now then he never will surely?


 

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Right Manager Wrong Owners


>

> Really wish I'd not bothered coming back on here

> as all you all do is piss me off. Seems to be most

> people's objectives within this thread.



There is no intention to piss anyone off Anna. And its good that you are back on here. We all have to put up with our clubs being the butt of jokes from time to time.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A stiker SP - any striker. Yes VP better than

> Bentner but for months they had to play without a

> striker.


Arshavin, Eduardo, Vela and Walcott. Ummm....are they not strikers then?


Spurs have nine first team players out and we still managed to get a good result at Stoke on Saturday. That's five wins on the trot. Just hope we can keep it going and hang on to fourth and win the FA Cup. Got my ticket for tomorrow's night's replay against Fulham.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A stiker SP - any striker. Yes VP better than

> > Bentner but for months they had to play without

> a

> > striker.

>

> Arshavin, Eduardo, Vela and Walcott. Ummm....are

> they not strikers then?

>


Not really Jah, I was thinking more of a penalty box poacher. Every team should have one.

Mick Mac Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------->

> Not really Jah, I was thinking more of a penalty

> box poacher. Every team should have one.


So you don't think Eduardo would come into that category? Most teams don't have them these days. Jermaine Defoe and Michael Owen are pretty good examples but I can't think of any other players like that at Premiership clubs. They are a dying breed.

Anna, I'm not digging for the sake of it! I've read the article and I understand the implications for all clubs. I just don't think you can blame owners and injuries for this. Why did he buy Aquilani only to keep him on the bench for so many important games? What happened with Robbie Keane?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good luck with this - there have been several requests over the years by students needing to do infant observations.  I was lucky when I did mine  - way back in 1994 at a local nursery. Have you tried contacting the NCT to see if there are any local groups who would be willing to participate? As a mother of 2 - found the observation very informative - mine was a 2 year old child as my course stated a child under 3. Got my highest grade for this project so was very happy.
    • Happy birthday! I've just read a bunch of your reviews and really enjoyed it. You write Interestingly without being too ornate, and you manage to give a really good insight into the "vibe" of a place as well as the food. Totally agree with your review of Rocca - it's simple, great food in a friendly atmosphere at a completely reasonable price, esp considering the location.
    • Hello,  I am a 52-year old mother and an integrative counsellor who lives and works in West Dulwich, SE21. In mid January I am starting a new training in Parent Infant Psychotherapy (helping parents to bond with their babies), and a key component of the course is a 24-month infant observation.  I’m looking for someone who will be giving birth ideally in January or February and who would allow me to observe their baby for one hour a week until the baby’s second birthday. The baby can be awake or asleep, playing, feeding, eating or interacting with carer/s and family members - whatever they normally do at that time.  The purpose of the observation is to enable me to gain a thorough knowledge of very early infant development and to develop the capacity to maintain an observationally minded and non-judgemental attitude in my work as an infant-parent psychotherapist.  I will provide enhanced DBS clearance and I’m happy to answer any questions.  Please forward this email to anyone who might be interested, email me at [email protected] or call me on 07949716043. I would be extremely grateful for any leads. Many thanks,  Millie  Millie Burton, MBACP Integrative Counsellor [email protected] millieburton.com
    • I keep my promises...had the Sweet & Sour Chicken.  It was great - the best sweet and sour dish I've ever had. The chicken itself was good and the sauce seemed home made with real vegetables and pineapple - it is NOT the red sugar sauce goo you get elsewhere.  The Korean fried chicken was very good but the sweet chili sauce was much more chili than sweet - just far too spicy for me. There is a honey something sauce that I will get next time. Egg fried veggie rice was good as a side.  We also ordered the chicken katsu curry which was polished off so quickly I didn't get to taste it. It looked very good tho. SD is not like Magic Wok used to be - cheap and filling but junk food. (Don't get me wrong - I went often to Magic Wok). SD's food is much higher quality, real ingredients, chunky portions, freshly prepared. I'll be back, for sure.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...