Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wrong Mick Mac - anyone assimilated into the

> > English team automatically becomes a South

> > African.

>


>

> Not sure this is me. You mean Narnia probably. I

> on the other hand, don't make mistakes.


Arsenal?

Only Arsenal (19 times) have beaten Man City on more occasions than Spurs (18 times) in the Premier League era. Fact!

Spurs have won away at City more often than any other club in the Premier League era - 8 times in 12 games. Fact!

I just hope that doesn't count for nothing. Come on you Spurs!

I bloody hope he is.

Also, I've been reading that Peter Crouch could be plouging a lone furrow up front. I don't agree with such negative tactics. It's not the Spurs way. We should just play our normal game and go for the jugular and hopefully come away with all three points. I'd settle for one though. Three would be the icing on the cake.

Spurs should definitely go for the win, and make sure Bale is forward of Assou-Ekotto...Harry bottled it at OT by dropping Bale back to LB and switching lefty Assou-Ekotto over to right back, both had a 'mare...Fergie was obviously worried by Bale when he played the pacier Rafael instead of Nev...

If he's scared of pacy wingers we might have a chance then.


Similar thoughts re City and defensiveness. Barry being injured Saturday was good, meant he couldn't play the three in central midfield (Barry, de Jong, and Viera), de Jong and Viera worked well as a two with Johnson and Bellamy. Just wish the two wingers would swap from time to time to hit the byline.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But a larger number, in a more hotly contested election, didn't. It is an anomaly that Starmer won a landslide in seats with a turnout for Labour which would have shamed Labour leaders in all the 21st and much of the post war 20th century.
    • I was not suggesting anything else!   I'm not sure how you interpret what I said  as "irrelevant"? I was responding to a post saying that Corbyn was "unelectable". My point was that a  large number  of the electorate  voted for him!
    • that's exactly what happened - Brickhouse were forced to close due to rent hike and then Gail's didn't move in until covid restrictions lifted and normality resumed. Gail's would have opened much sooner as they were lined up and able to offer the landlord much higher rents. Brickhouse was a local favourite
    • The Brickhouse closed just before Covid December 2019. Nothing to do with Gails muscling in as they didn't move into till December 2022. Stop trying to fit a false narrative into a story
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...