Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Wrong Mick Mac - anyone assimilated into the

> > English team automatically becomes a South

> > African.

>


>

> Not sure this is me. You mean Narnia probably. I

> on the other hand, don't make mistakes.


Arsenal?

Only Arsenal (19 times) have beaten Man City on more occasions than Spurs (18 times) in the Premier League era. Fact!

Spurs have won away at City more often than any other club in the Premier League era - 8 times in 12 games. Fact!

I just hope that doesn't count for nothing. Come on you Spurs!

I bloody hope he is.

Also, I've been reading that Peter Crouch could be plouging a lone furrow up front. I don't agree with such negative tactics. It's not the Spurs way. We should just play our normal game and go for the jugular and hopefully come away with all three points. I'd settle for one though. Three would be the icing on the cake.

Spurs should definitely go for the win, and make sure Bale is forward of Assou-Ekotto...Harry bottled it at OT by dropping Bale back to LB and switching lefty Assou-Ekotto over to right back, both had a 'mare...Fergie was obviously worried by Bale when he played the pacier Rafael instead of Nev...

If he's scared of pacy wingers we might have a chance then.


Similar thoughts re City and defensiveness. Barry being injured Saturday was good, meant he couldn't play the three in central midfield (Barry, de Jong, and Viera), de Jong and Viera worked well as a two with Johnson and Bellamy. Just wish the two wingers would swap from time to time to hit the byline.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
    • That petition is bananas.   If you want a youth centre there pay the landlord the same rent a Londis would and build it yourself or shut the f**k up to be honest. Wasting our MPs time with this trivial nonsense is appalling. If your kids are still out at 1am on a school night you've got bigger problems than vapes and booze and hot sausage rolls. 
    • There used to be a better baker than Gail's on the same site immediately before Gail's pulled their financial muscle.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...