Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The fact that we had just a clear onside decision flagged as off in the first half, and the keane scores from an onside position rankles somewhat


Fabianski tho ? that experiment has to stop. As well as wrists made out of coat hanger wire his reactions to the Bentley miss was horrific to see


Bentley btw ? a textbook case for all young English players about what happens I fyou believe your own hype.

Hmmm...the referee was shit. Is he a Gooner or what? Both penalties looked a bit harsh to me especially the first one from where I was sitting in the West Stand and they effectively killed us off. Arsenal put out a more experienced team than ours but I'll accept the defeat. I think Arsenal having not won anything for a long time would like some silverware and good luck to them in the Carling Cup.

One positive I take from the match is the performance of Sandro. He looks a top player and I think we've got ourselves a bargain there.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:


> Bentley btw ? a textbook case for all young

> English players about what happens if you believe

> your own hype.


Totally agree with you on this. He was absolute rubbish last night and not for the first time either. Message to Harry - Get rid.

I'm sure mr Wenger reciprocates and wishes mr Redknapp in his quest to win th title for the first time in 50 years. I can't help but think the recent clamour to appoint mr Redknapp as the next England manager. His record at Southampton, Portsmouth, and West Ham leave a lot to be desired, that and accustaions of dodgy dealings are not ideal, not by a long way.
Well I suppose someone has to, I felt for the lad who was pictured crying as his team were been given a lesson in fotballing skills. If his dad had any heart at all, he should have told him this is what usually happens when they meet better opposition. Bentley again demonstrated why Arsenal got shot of him. It is interseting that you accuse the ref of being biased, especially as he did not card the first 4 hacks at Wilshere. God help us if he refs us against Blackburn or Bolton.
Well I would say that as he has grown older he has become quite gracious in defeat. This was not meant to be bait Anna just my observation of him. If you're just blinkered in your view of him then so be it. I bet you'd have liked him to be your manager over the last 20 years.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No, because there is a bit more to sport than just

> winning, and Fergie is a nasty bastard.


What do you base that comment on Keef? So you'd rather have a nice chappie in charge and finish mid table each season than a so called 'nasty bastard' who wins you the league? That's bo**ix.

Being a bad loser is partly what makes someone a winner in my book. It gives them that drive to succeed. Most successful managers over the years have been terrible losers. Ferguson and Wenger are perfect examples of winging moaners, blaming referees and whatnot. They're bad losers but have a quick look in their trophy cabinets. Not exactly bare are they?

Well Wenger's has been for a while, and Hughs & Big Sam are 2 very very bad losers, and they haven't won much.


So you'd rather have a nice chappie in charge and finish mid table each season than a so called 'nasty bastard' who wins you the league?


No, I never said that.


If I was a United fan *shudders*, I'd obviouslt hold Fergie in very very high regard, and be chuffed with all he'd won. BUT, I don't think I'd be completely comfortable with the man, and his behaviour, because he's a coont (to quote ratty).


Sh!t like the "hairdryer", in my book is not the way anyone should be treating their players. If you're happy winning in that way, good on ya, but I think it stinks.

I think it's also a little unfair to call someone like Ferguson a nasty bastard. I'm pretty sure if you asked most people involved in football on a day to day basis they would say he's a pretty good man. He does a lot for football in general and he is pretty supportive of other managers and players.

Why is it that whenever an observation is made about personnel at Manchester United, people get all defensive and instead of providing examples to justify why they feel that observation is incorrect we result to "well he's better than your manager" type arguments?


Mr Ferguson being gracious in defeat has nothing at all to do with any other team.

Well what do you want Keef? Presumably you'd like to win something.Would you care what happened in the dressing room if your team won the league and played good football? Man U have done that for years now and it's down to Ferguson. He gets the best out of his players most of the time. There are not many ex Man U players who have complained about him. There are quite a few who have become managers themselves. It's also been noted on many occasion that Fergie is often the first one on the phone to a manager who has been sacked. People could say that he only won what he did in England because of Man U's money but that doesn't explain how he managed to win so much with a club like Aberdeen in Scotland.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why is it that whenever an observation is made

> about personnel at Manchester United, people get

> all defensive and instead of providing examples to

> justify why they feel that observation is

> incorrect we result to "well he's better than your

> manager" type arguments?

>

> Mr Ferguson being gracious in defeat has nothing

> at all to do with any other team.


Spot on. United fans are without doubt the most sensitive of creatures who are easily offended and find it necessary to defend even the slightest critiicism, it borders on paranoia.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...