Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Manure idiots have to take it too far and I'm not

> having ago at the majority of true fans

> http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s

> /1370797_pictures_and_video_sick_united_graffiti_a

> ttack_on_city_pub_included_slur_on_tragic_foe


Week in week out Citeh 'fans' sing 'Carlos Tevez is a Blue, he hates Munichs'...people in glass houses...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Then why bother posting on this forum...it's

> nothing but cheap point scoring, something you've

> always done on here...



Putting this into perspective, lets be honest, he isn't the only one guilty of cheap point scoring, if indeed thats is what he's done. In a similar vein, the awful sectarian bile that reared its ugly head on here between Celtic and Rangers was a tad too much for me, banter is one thing, but come on people. I know we all love our teams and feel passionately about them, which sometimes leads to the red mist descending. I guess what I'm saying is, if you dish out banter, you have to expect it back, but not poisonous nasty ranting. I'll get off me soap box now.

Whilst watching my sons mates play for for Dulwich Hamlet against Whyteleafe last night (they won 2 nil), I also managed to keep an eye on the Manchester derby. Both sides were more worried about losing the game than winning it and as a result did Chelsea a big favour.


Joey Barton reverted to type, yet again, by punching Pederson, and Newcastle came back down to earth with a bump by losing at home. Scott Parkers goal was easily the goal of the night, and Blackpool were unlucky, yet again. The Arsenal got a good win, very pleased, as Molineux is not as easy place to go to and get a result these days. Fabregas should know better than to dive in on a player, especially when the player is going nowhere fast. Essiens red card was deserved and Chelsea could have won by a hat full. And so to Liverpool. What can you make of a team that only a few days previously beat the champions of England and puts in a very average shift against Wigan. On this evidence top four, let alone Champs League, will be a big ask.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> didn't Liverpool lose that same fixture last year?

> It's progress at least



Looking at their league position, I wouldn't call that progress, I would call it a big backward step. It's unfortunate but they rely far too heavily on Stevie G and Torres and when they don't perform, they're buggered. I feel for those two, and you can't help but think that they are seriously considering moving on in order to prolong their careers, or face burn out as a result of the the over reliance by the club on the both of them.

'bout now Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh dear, pressure.

>

> RD you can't always have it your own way. BR has

> always been myopic, so have you.


Pressure, what pressure? We're used to the pressure of challenging for the League, just like you're no doubt used to pressure of a relegation dogfight ;-)


Myopic? I don't disagree, to varying degrees that applies to most on here, although I am more than capable of seeing the bigger picture, and more than happy to contribute to non-Utd issues.


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GFxgnPNG8nU/TCoXoGP3nWI/AAAAAAAAAbE/eTLZfafSGoA/s200/mr_magooglasses.jpg


Despite the rampant myopism, I don't expect to see crass postings like BR's on the EDF. It's the sort of post you get on 606, TalkSport, etc. Despite his protestations to the contrary, his post IMO served no purpose other than to paint (unintended pun) Utd fans in an extremely bad light, otherwise why post it? There isn't a club in the country that hasn't got a number of mindless morons who support them. I could quite easily put up similar posts where Citeh/Liverpool 'fans' have sprayed Munich graffiti, sung songs etc (only last night Citeh 'fans' were singing Munich songs and waving their arms mimicing an airplane), and likewise Liverpool supporters can about Utd 'fans' and Hillsborough, but I choose not to...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'bout now Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Oh dear, pressure.

> >

> > RD you can't always have it your own way. BR

> has

> > always been myopic, so have you.

>

> Pressure, what pressure? We're used to the

> pressure of challenging for the League, just like

> you're no doubt used to pressure of a relegation

> dogfight ;-)

>

> Myopic? I don't disagree, to varying degrees that

> applies to most on here, although I am more than

> capable of seeing the bigger picture, and more

> than happy to contribute to non-Utd issues.

>

> http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GFxgnPNG8nU/TCoXoGP3nWI/

> AAAAAAAAAbE/eTLZfafSGoA/s200/mr_magooglasses.jpg

>

> Despite the rampant myopism, I don't expect to see

> crass postings like BR's on the EDF. It's the sort

> of post you get on 606, TalkSport, etc. Despite

> his protestations to the contrary, his post IMO

> served no purpose other than to paint (unintended

> pun) Utd fans in an extremely bad light, otherwise

> why post it? There isn't a club in the country

> that hasn't got a number of mindless morons who

> support them. I could quite easily put up similar

> posts where Citeh/Liverpool 'fans' have sprayed

> Munich graffiti, sung songs etc (only last night

> Citeh 'fans' were singing Munich songs and waving

> their arms mimicing an airplane), and likewise

> Liverpool supporters can about Utd 'fans' and

> Hillsborough, but I choose not to...



Forgive me, and I'm not try to wind you up here, but aren't you trying to point score here? Surely the best way to respond to those posters that you find offensive, would be to ignore them??? Only asking


Edited as I can't spell "them" properly, d'oh!!

Forgive me, and I'm not trying to wind you up here, but coming from you that's a bit rich...to some extent we're all point scoring, even you're last post could be construed as such, and so might this reply, but there has to be a line that we don't cross. Mick Mac felt SCSB79 had crossed it with his remarks about Celtic. So to answer your question...no


PS. you missed off ing from try...1-0! ;-)

Back to the football. Only saw the second half last night but City showed no ambition whatsoever. At one stage they had 3 players attacking on the edge of the Utd box and every other City player was in their own half! For a Wolves or Birmingham etc at home to Utd you could excuse not pushing players forward and settling for a point but I expected more from City.


The fact is though that Mancini sees it as a point gained. Only 7 goals at home from 6 home league games, they may grind their way into 4th place but not sure it will be much fun to watch.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Forgive me, and I'm not trying to wind you up

> here, but coming from you that's a bit rich...to

> some extent we're all point scoring, even you're

> last post could be construed as such, and so might

> this reply, but there has to be a line that we

> don't cross. Mick Mac felt SCSB79 had crossed it

> with his remarks about Celtic. So to answer your

> question...no

>

> PS. you missed off ing from try...1-0! ;-)



Yes indeed 1 nil, well played.

murphy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Back to the football. Only saw the second half

> last night but City showed no ambition whatsoever.

> At one stage they had 3 players attacking on the

> edge of the Utd box and every other City player

> was in their own half! For a Wolves or Birmingham

> etc at home to Utd you could excuse not pushing

> players forward and settling for a point but I

> expected more from City.

>

> The fact is though that Mancini sees it as a point

> gained. Only 7 goals at home from 6 home league

> games, they may grind their way into 4th place but

> not sure it will be much fun to watch.


I was watching Dulwich Hamlet Youth play at Champion Hill and kept running back to the bar to watch the game on Sky, I thought neither team had much ambition.

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> murphy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Back to the football. Only saw the second half

> > last night but City showed no ambition

> whatsoever.

> > At one stage they had 3 players attacking on

> the

> > edge of the Utd box and every other City player

> > was in their own half! For a Wolves or

> Birmingham

> > etc at home to Utd you could excuse not pushing

> > players forward and settling for a point but I

> > expected more from City.

> >

> > The fact is though that Mancini sees it as a

> point

> > gained. Only 7 goals at home from 6 home league

> > games, they may grind their way into 4th place

> but

> > not sure it will be much fun to watch.

>

> I was watching Dulwich Hamlet Youth play at

> Champion Hill and kept running back to the bar to

> watch the game on Sky, I thought neither team had

> much ambition.



Spot on Emerson, neither side were playing for a win, win played like an away side rather than the advantaged home team but I guess we won a cheap point ! ;-) against the Rags

Dear Red Devil, I'm sorry, I baited you after seeing the mighty Hammers give away yet another lead. I apologise I was being glib and your response was bang on.


I do like BR though, his protestations on not wasting "big money" on Rooney were effing hilarious.


Santa Cruz

Robinho

Adebayour

Milner

Barry

Kolo Toure

Lescott


Cheap at half the price.


Actually that's not really true..........

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> Spot on Emerson, neither side were playing for a

> win, win played like an away side rather than the

> advantaged home team but I guess we won a cheap

> point ! ;-) against the Rags


Entiitled to your views of course but not one shared by the TV pundits at the game, the newspapers

or the players from either side.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...