Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Back to normal in Scotland then Mac?

>

> Celtic 4 Hearts 0

> Hibernian 0 Rangers 2

>

> Celtic and Rangers 1 & 2. Boring.



Its never boring when you are 5 points clear of your great rivals Jah, and I know it was probably the 1980s since that last happened to you...


But your day will come and tell me its boring then?

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If they activated it Liverpool's resolve would

> count for nout! They's have no choice!

>

> Crazy putting these clauses in contracts imo!



I'm guessing who ever agreed to this clause thought it would be a way of realising a profit somewhere down the line.

If they activated it Liverpool's resolve would count for nout! They's have no choice! Crazy putting these clauses in contracts imo!


That was Christian Purslow (if true)


It is in the current bun, but apparently, Torres has put in a transfer request.


Sorry but don't even quote that shitty rag and LFC in the same sentence.

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ratty Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > If they activated it Liverpool's resolve would

> > count for nout! They's have no choice!

> >

> > Crazy putting these clauses in contracts imo!

>

>

> I'm guessing who ever agreed to this clause

> thought it would be a way of realising a profit

> somewhere down the line.



Guess so, I always presumed they were agent generated! (Spits on ground)

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've never understood why agents are used by

> players. Most people with a modicum of

> intelligence should be able to conduct

> negotiations for themselves without paying these

> leeches sack loads of money, and saving the clubs

> involved unecessary expense.


You are joking aren't you - why do you think the players are all paid squillions .... do you think they could negotiate this themselves.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think Jermaine Defoe has acted on his own behalf

> before. A lot of time though, Agents are paid by

> clubs, not the players!

>

> And Harry Redknapp is paid by Agents (allegedly!)



Now now ratty, we all know 'arry is not a fecking wheeler dealer, allegedly!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...