Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yeah. Like West Ham's perfectly good 90th minute winner being disallowed for a handball that no-one else other than the referee saw ...poor, old unlucky Wolves. West Ham aren't very good but Everton's 92nd minute equaliser after a frankly Bizzarre sending off and the above would have seen us with 4 more points. So the luck thing and the dodgy sdecisions thing actually break pretty even over time, so Arsenal fans moaning about Karmic influence ditto Man U, Liverpool and Chelsea saying their victimised is hysterical for us fans of the normal clubs. Some twa*t in the Observer the other day actually siad "I'm a long suffering Arsenal fan"!!!! Long suffering! Try being a fan of West Ham or Newcastle or the Blades or etc etc etc

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still, at least we weren't 4 goals clear....;)



I don't support arsenal so it does not bother ne. I'm supporting chelsea spurs and man city this year. None if whom look like winning me any money.

Quids. I'm not saying other teams aren't frequently hard done by. Or that arsenal don't sometimes get the rub of the green. I have also repeatedly said that ultimately today was arsenals fault


But


It wasn't one or even two decisions that were blatant today. Whatever the reasons, the tally by the end was bizarre and I stand by Chelsea and man utd not having to ever worry about the net total of decisions


Atticus, I'm not quite sure what your point is. A several yards offside goal last week has led to...?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sandperson Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Still, at least we weren't 4 goals clear....;)

>

>

> I don't support arsenal so it does not bother ne.

> I'm supporting chelsea spurs and man city this

> year. None if whom look like winning me any money.


MM, I know your fickle ways! I was just saying I think I'd be more gutted had that been the scenario.

I'll happily spell it out for you then.

Moyes' outburst earlier this week, might, just might have helped plant a negative seed into the heads of match officials where ref'ing Arsenal games is concerned. The revelation of your captain's tunnel outburst will have been noted by many referees, who are after all only human. Hope that's clear. Besides, surely Wolves have helped soften the blow.

Oh I don't know. There'll be no secretarian bile emanating from the stands though I should think Torres will come in for some stick and there is a bit of recent history between these two so plenty in this one to have more than a passing interest and I seriously want Liverpool to win. Come on the Pool.

I don't know what Smith does at half time, but he took a team on top of the game at HT to a team who seemed to be scared to be leading a game.

Had the opportunity to grab that game by the throat and hammer Celtic.

Naismith a silly boy for getting sent off.


Oh well, 7 games this season. Boring.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...