Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only slight disappointment yesterday for me, was

> the fact we didn't use our new striker. Would've

> loved it if he could've scored.


I'd have thought that not having to use him made it an even better win.

I was only half paying attention yesterday so at one point when I'd woken up I reached the conclusion Lampard wasn't playing. Finally I saw him. He can't have been much involved though.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still, at least we weren't 4 goals clear....;)



At least we didn't lose to team bottom of premier league, and our side doesn't "boast" a player on ?250K a week. What great value for money he's provided for his clubs investment.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haha. I think being four up and only getting a

> point is a bit more gutting. It seems whatever you

> are paying your team it's not enough to defend a

> four goal lead.



Still didn't lose to bottom club, and still don't pay over the odds for players. Lead now only four points and the Mancs have got to play us, Chavski, and Liverpool.

Well, I guess we'll see. I think there's a few in your team who you've paid over the odds for. Rosicky, Arshavin, Bendtner for example. The Arsenal have had an excellent season and looking back over the results they've had they are unlucky to be second. It's going to be an interesting run in.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, I guess we'll see. I think there's a few in

> your team who you've paid over the odds for.

> Rosicky, Arshavin, Bendtner for example. The

> Arsenal have had an excellent season and looking

> back over the results they've had they are unlucky

> to be second. It's going to be an interesting run

> in.


We'll see indeed.

CELTIC could be set to lose one of their top players as Manchester United prepare a summer swoop for defender Emilio Izaguirre, according to reports.


The Honduran international impressed during last year?s World Cup in South Africa and has been on the radar of some top clubs ever since.


Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson was at Ibrox for Sunday?s Scottish Cup tie between the Old Firm casting his eye over Izaguirre and it?s now believed he will track him for the rest of the season as a long-term replacement for Patrice Evra

kpc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Man Utd Mayfair Office

>

> Man Utd's global commercial department is having

> to move to bigger offices at a rent of just under

> ?1m a year to accommodate their team of 45

> employees!


What? No offices in Manchester?

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Annasfield Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Still in the same City though Jah.

> >

> > Any club having their office over 200 miles

> away

> > does seem a bit daft.

>

>

> True dat, well in Anna.


Erm, it's the corporate office...sponsorship, global client stuff. The club administration is still at OT and Carrington. Maybe you should read the article rather than just picking out random words that suit your (rather poor) joke.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...