Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think most of Spurs' actual fans were at best ambivalent about this.


But If I could take this opportunity to tell that 'I got lucky with Amstrad and selling Sky dishes' cunt 'Sir' Alan to take one of his sattelite dishes and stuff it up his arse...sideways....I'd be most grateful.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think most of Spurs' actual fans were at best

> ambivalent about this.

>

> But If I could take this opportunity to tell that

> 'I got lucky with Amstrad and selling Sky dishes'

> @#$%& 'Sir' Alan to take one of his sattelite

> dishes and stuff it up his arse...sideways....I'd

> be most grateful.


Now that's not nice is it? ;-)

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't have you down as a Lord Sugar kind of fella

> Emerson...;-)


On the contrary I think he's the most wonderful.......................alright, alright I think he's a tool. There!! Happy now? :)

In all seriousness I'm not sure about us filling 60,000....certainly not next season we wouldn't have :-S; I'm not sure about the running track.....and I don't give it (the running track) that long, I'm not sentimental about The Boyleyn, in all honest we should have built a new stadium in Docklnads years ago....but I AM enjoying pissing off our neighbours NW of us. Sugar was really sour grapes and I've even partaken of a bit of Talksport to hear moaning Spuds "Givin' it too a mickey mouse club like West Ham"...


...tee hee.... COYI



West Ham United anagram 'The New Stadium' B)

When we played Spurs at Anfield last season, it was not long after the tax story had broken. A couple of us emailed George Sephton (the voice of Anfield) to request that he played "Taxman" by the Beatles at half time. He came on over the tannoy and mentioned that he'd had a few requests for a particular song, but had just reaslised it would be inappropriate, so here's a song from the same album. He played "Got to get you in to my life" instead.


It was great that he acknowledged our request, but it would have been even better if he'd played it.


Anyway, small things....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...