Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Keef

Keef

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mick, when you know full well that that is

> going

> > to get a rise out of Emerson, what is the

> point,

> > other than to antagonise?

> >

>

>

If you can dish it out you should be able to take

> it. My personal view is that anyone who can get

> annoyed about football banter needs to take a good

> look at themselves.



See I basically agree with that. But when you know full well that it does wind someone up, I just dont see the point.

Emerson Crane

Emerson Crane

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > More than aware of these "epitahs", since I've

> > followed the club since 68, unlike Tick Tac who

> > changes allegiances to suit his mood. Proper

> plum.

> > If I were to come out with the dross that he

> trots

> > out, I'd be told to be less antagonistic and

> > confrontational, he, on the other hand, is seen

> as

> > a bit of a joker. The man is hilarious, just

> like

> > his clubs exploits in the CMPL, ooops sorry, I

> > forgot that they aren't in it any more. Now I

> > promise to leave it, provided Victoria Plum

> drops

> > it.

>

>

>

> When Henrik rode into town and took your one

> chance of the big cup....

>

>

>

>

Obviously you won't let it lie, so let me ask you this. Was he playing for a scots club at the time? The only person on here that needs to take a long hard look at himself is you. I have no respect for the likes of you who readily admit he changed allegiances, because they are a "bigger" club. Yeah course they are, you tube. Big fish in a very small pond, nothing more nothing less. Now over to you.

Emerson Crane

Emerson Crane

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> ..or 4-0 and u fooked it up to be precise.

>

> But that really is a bit of fun innit. Eight-nil.


I ain't got a problem with that, because its true, but I ain't having some numpty banging on about a players performance that wasn't playing for his (second) club at the time, but has an association with said club. The fella obviously needs his lunch time bevvy.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought MM changed his team according to who he

> had money on that season? His heart's always in

> Scotland, his head is where ever his wallet is.

> That's fair enough if you ask me.


What a sound chap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • malumbu
      Which Brie is best?

      By malumbu · Posted

      I'd actually go the whole hog and do a fondue, we all remember them fondly from parties in the last century or trips to Switzerland.  As long as it is cheese, not chocolate, urghhh
    • fishboy
      GALA 2025

      By fishboy · Posted

      Gosh, that all sounds so familiar!  Southwark are constantly holding up their Outdoor Events Policy as proof of process, but then constantly allow exceptions when things aren't quite done correctly. Point in case, Gala's licence application - extract from the Consultation Findings Report - "The GALA team formally submitted their application to hold GALA 2025 to the council on the 7 October 2024. It is usually a requirement that applications for larger scale events are submitted with a minimum of 9 months to process them, but discretion can be applied if there are mitigating circumstances. 8.4 of the Outdoor Events Policy clarifies that processing applications received outside the stated lead-in times is at the Council's discretion. In this case: • The council were aware that Assembled Gala were preparing an application for the event to take place in 2025 in advance of their submission date, with operational discussions already taking place • GALA festival has been taking place in Peckham Rye Park since 2018 – less time is needed regarding event planning than if it were a new event • The GALA team already have a Premises Licence in place for this event (this is a pre- requisite for the Event Licence to be issued), so no time needed to be factored in for a premises licence application and decision-making process" So despite the fact that there would need to be major planning decisions due to the change of site access, they didn't think Gala needed to adhere to the same rules as everyone else? Makes me wonder what other rules they are exempted from... On a similar note, has anyone received a Resident Communication letter, containing the contact details for issues? We haven't, and we live directly opposite the site on Colyton Rd. They were supposedly distributed on 29/4...
    • Angelina
      Which Brie is best?

      By Angelina · Posted

      We find that just adding your own favourites is the best way - everyone likes different things and your guests will likely be happy enough
    • Spartacus
      Which Brie is best?

      By Spartacus · Posted

      Sue, if you put on a Dog mask, I'm.sure Bob will say "nice bit of wensleydale Grommit?" to you at the drinks 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...