Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mick, when you know full well that that is

> going

> > to get a rise out of Emerson, what is the

> point,

> > other than to antagonise?

> >

>

>

If you can dish it out you should be able to take

> it. My personal view is that anyone who can get

> annoyed about football banter needs to take a good

> look at themselves.



See I basically agree with that. But when you know full well that it does wind someone up, I just dont see the point.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > More than aware of these "epitahs", since I've

> > followed the club since 68, unlike Tick Tac who

> > changes allegiances to suit his mood. Proper

> plum.

> > If I were to come out with the dross that he

> trots

> > out, I'd be told to be less antagonistic and

> > confrontational, he, on the other hand, is seen

> as

> > a bit of a joker. The man is hilarious, just

> like

> > his clubs exploits in the CMPL, ooops sorry, I

> > forgot that they aren't in it any more. Now I

> > promise to leave it, provided Victoria Plum

> drops

> > it.

>

>

>

> When Henrik rode into town and took your one

> chance of the big cup....

>

>

>

>

Obviously you won't let it lie, so let me ask you this. Was he playing for a scots club at the time? The only person on here that needs to take a long hard look at himself is you. I have no respect for the likes of you who readily admit he changed allegiances, because they are a "bigger" club. Yeah course they are, you tube. Big fish in a very small pond, nothing more nothing less. Now over to you.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> ..or 4-0 and u fooked it up to be precise.

>

> But that really is a bit of fun innit. Eight-nil.


I ain't got a problem with that, because its true, but I ain't having some numpty banging on about a players performance that wasn't playing for his (second) club at the time, but has an association with said club. The fella obviously needs his lunch time bevvy.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought MM changed his team according to who he

> had money on that season? His heart's always in

> Scotland, his head is where ever his wallet is.

> That's fair enough if you ask me.


What a sound chap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...