Jump to content

Recommended Posts

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did you not have Basel at 5/1 then Mick?


I thought I was going to win some money last night. With ten mins to go and the score at 1-0, I backed Basel to win 2-0 at 10/1, unfortunately MU had to get a consolation.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/12016/7362

> 197/Roo-appeal-angers-Dalglish

>

> King Kenny very peeved.


I think he has a right to feel a bit peeved, don't you? Especially when the FA are defending Wayne Rooney who deliberately kicked a player and was rightly sent off. Would they have been so quick to defend him if he hadn't been representing England at the time because I think if he'd done that representing Manchester United in a domestic match he'd have got an instant three match ban from the FA.

I agree that's his strategy and Suarez as good a player as he is, he has plenty of previous when it comes to cheating. Not least his goalkeeping heroics at the last world cup finals. And he keeps getting into trouble what with the latest spat at Fulham on Monday night. Kenny should get his own house in order and sort Suarez out.

I always said that as good a player as Ronaldo was at Man U, he was also cheating scum.


It is only right then that I acknowledge that Suarez has habits that I really don't like. A shame, because he's a great player.


Do think Kenny has a point though, and why the hell is this racism thing being allowed to drag on? The FA are hardly covering themselves in glory, you'd have thought they'd have wanted it resolved quickly.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *sings* Manchesterrrrr la, la, laaaa,

> Manchesterrrr la, la, laaaa....

>

> so for CL final stage qualification that would be

> London 2:0 Manchester right?

>

> Makes the upcoming FA Cup game a MUST win for

> both, if only to salvage a little pride.



Maybe hold your horses until "London" actually win one one. Manchester 3 London 0

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/12016/7362

>

> > 197/Roo-appeal-angers-Dalglish

> >

> > King Kenny very peeved.

>

> I think he has a right to feel a bit peeved, don't

> you? Especially when the FA are defending Wayne

> Rooney who deliberately kicked a player and was

> rightly sent off. Would they have been so quick to

> defend him if he hadn't been representing England

> at the time because I think if he'd done that

> representing Manchester United in a domestic match

> he'd have got an instant three match ban from the

> FA.


Totally agree with you on this one Jah, theres no defence for waht he did and for the FA to appeal gives out the wrong signal. By the way Vidic out for the rest of the season.

Sharon_H Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > *sings* Manchesterrrrr la, la, laaaa,

> > Manchesterrrr la, la, laaaa....

> >

> > so for CL final stage qualification that would

> be

> > London 2:0 Manchester right?

> >

> > Makes the upcoming FA Cup game a MUST win for

> > both, if only to salvage a little pride.

>

>

> Maybe hold your horses until "London" actually win

> one one. Manchester 3 London 0



But Manchester won't be adding to that this season will they? Pahahahahahahahaha. To qoute the back back of the Metro from yesterday "Mancs but no Mancs". This one will run and run. And a lovely photo has appeared on one of the Arsenal wesites dpeicting an idiot Citeh fan having a tattoo completed on his arm depicting the Champs league trophy with the legend "Winners 2011" underneath it. >:D<

So how do gooners feel about their new statues? When compared to the photos they were modelled on Henry - instead of an expression of aggressive determination - looks like he's sat on a milk bottle http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/12/09/article-2072146-0F1EB61C00000578-865_468x537.jpg



and Tony Adams' expression of joy/relief has been transformed into the smirk of an amateur magician who has successfully vanished a rabbit.

http://i.thisislondon.co.uk/i/pix/2011/12/other-statue-415.jpg

Nah! Feck the Arse. Let's just clarify something! Manchester City spend god knows how much on wages and transfer fees to get into the Champions League and win it and go out at the first stage in a relatively easy group. Tottenham last season only spent eight million quid on Van De Vaart and win one of the toughest groups and get to quarter-finals finals beating both Milan clubs along the way and we make a profit doing so and they make record losses! Who's getting value for their money?

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sharon_H Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > maxxi Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > *sings* Manchesterrrrr la, la, laaaa,

> > > Manchesterrrr la, la, laaaa....

> > >

> > > so for CL final stage qualification that

> would

> > be

> > > London 2:0 Manchester right?

> > >

> > > Makes the upcoming FA Cup game a MUST win for

> > > both, if only to salvage a little pride.

> >

> >

> > Maybe hold your horses until "London" actually

> win

> > one one. Manchester 3 London 0

>

>

> But Manchester won't be adding to that this season

> will they? Pahahahahahahahaha. To qoute the back

> back of the Metro from yesterday "Mancs but no

> Mancs". This one will run and run. And a lovely

> photo has appeared on one of the Arsenal wesites

> dpeicting an idiot Citeh fan having a tattoo

> completed on his arm depicting the Champs league

> trophy with the legend "Winners 2011" underneath

> it. >:D<


The amount of trophies that "London" teams have won in Europe could be balanced on Gary Nevilles Moustache.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Maybe if you indicated what you were reviewing, pub, gastro pub, high-end gourmet, local Italian etc. - whatever classifications you wanted, then you need only indicate that your stars referred to overall quality in that category. So it it's pub grub then 5 stars means it's great pub grub, but not the same experience as 5 stars in a high end gourmet category. Your star system could then include implicitly value for money as well. 
    • Does OP know they can sell everything but alcohol even without a license?😄
    • Thanks, it's a real dilemma whether to do star ratings. A few people have asked me to do them but I've tried to resist as they are too reductive - people will look at them and won't read review! and they are difficult too - my last review of Victoria Inn, i'd give it five stars for value for money - how can you knock two courses for £18? – but 2 stars for quality - edible but nothing special. Which I guess is why some sites give star ratings for different things...
    • ok - Jeremy himself is against mandatory vaccines. Is he as extreme as his brother? No? Is it fair to discuss how the overall view of that family would inform Jeremy's response to the pandemic? I would argue very much so    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...