Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I suppose because of experience you have to make United favourites now, but not over yet.


Arsenal only 1 point behind Spurs now. I'm no gooner, but when you consider the mess they were in early in the season, you have to admire that. Chelsea not out of the running by any means either.


Perhaps Harry is planning an end of season collapse, so it'll be easier to walk away from Spurs...

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Arsenal only 1 point behind Spurs now. I'm no

> gooner, but when you consider the mess they were

> in early in the season, you have to admire that.

> Chelsea not out of the running by any means

> either.


It would be an interesting tustle amongst the top five teams. Man City seems to have a problem with their away record. Spurs have dominated matches but can't convert chances made. With Chelsea and Arsenal both capable enough to pull a string of results to qualify for Champions League. City has a better goal difference that Utd, so a run of nine wins and a draw may be enough for them. There are still enough twists for the Premiership race.

Nothing is done and dusted yet, and there are still 10 games to go. I see Dalglish has asked the authorities to long at Wengers cllims that Suarez is a diver and a cheat. Just saying what we all think then. Is this to deflect the fact that despite all of the millions spent and being welcomed home like some long lost son, his performance is not musch better than Woys and he's beginning to feel the heat? He's buckled under the pressure before, and I wouldn't be surprised if it happened again. Just suppose Liverpool lose tonight and Everton go above them, which on previous history is unlikely, would he be under more pressure having spent shed loads and Moyes spent zip?

Suarez isn't in the Ronaldo / Drogba / Klinnsman diving league yet, but he's getting there so I think it's a fair comment from Wenger.


He might have gone ape if someone had said that about one of his players, but that's because there isn't really anyone in the current Arsenal side that makes you think "diver" when you hear their name.

Fair enough, but he has been there a long time, and there have been a few in those years.


I hate seeing dives, and admit that Suarez has taken a couple, and would rather he didn't. I just can't stand the holier than thou attitude of some people, who think that a player in their team's shirt would never do a thing like that.


Anyway, why exactly are we talking about this AGAIN?

My team's better than your team.

Your team has divers, my team is pristine.

I care about the SPL

WE DON'T CARE ABOUT THE SPL.

This manger's shit.

No that manager's shit.

Liverpool, liverpool yaaaawn yaaaawn

Man U Man U chelsea even bigger yaaaaawn

Intersperse all of the above with derogatory refrences (spuds manure chelski etc)


...rinse and repeat for 400 pages * 3 threads

Parkdrive/Atila whatever you call yourself these days. Kenny left after Hillsborough having attended many of the funerals and supporting the club and it's fans. Do you seriously consider him to be a bottler for leaving after the stress involved with that tragedy?

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive/Atila whatever you call yourself these

> days. Kenny left after Hillsborough having

> attended many of the funerals and supporting the

> club and it's fans. Do you seriously consider him

> to be a bottler for leaving after the stress

> involved with that tragedy?


I think at his age and given his track record, which is all we have to go by, it's a possibility, that's all I'm saying. But Liverpool fans seem to able to overlook his performance in a way that were never able to overlook Woy's. Unfair treatment if you ask me. Stevie G did the business to cover up the embrrassment of Carrol being, yet again, unable to find his arse with both hands.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ha. Absolutely disgraceful. Certain chelsea

> players should be dismissed for selective

> performance under last manager

>

> I think they are a disgrace

>

> (regardless of any objective merit in tonight's

> game)


Possibly. But its a Cup game, last chance motel situation. Don't think can make that judgement call. Besides, stuff changes with new managers in any workplace, good, bad, indifferent.

I dunno SJ, do we believe that players have so little pride now, that they'd sit back and let results run against them, in order to get a manager sacked? I'm no Chelsea fan, but you'd think they'd have the will to win of any pro sports person.


I also think that a new manager can produce good results, look at Sunderland!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The Sky article says the manager has apologised. Apparently, according to the article the person who said they'd apply on Rachel and her husband behalf left and didn't hand the job on. Here's the article https://news.sky.com/story/politics-latest-reeves-rent-mistake-labour-starmer-asylum-budget-tax-farage-reform-12593360?postid=10440668#liveblog-body
    • Or another thing journalists could do if they wanted to is unearth how many reform or Tory MPs are landlords with similar or worse errors   
    • I'm utterly baffled as to why anybody thinks this is newsworthy, let alone worth a front page. The economy has barely grown for 20 years and the housing crisis has been worsening for a similar time period. Note to any journalists on the forum: maybe focus your headlines on important issues.
    • Two wrongs might not make a right. But the two wrongs could at least be of equal value before we get too judgey    paying an estate agent to deal with all of the admin on my to have the estate agent not point out all of the admin  vs Deliberately hacking into an MPs email. And boasting about it (Badenoch)    as for throwing a local estate agent under the bus, when did local estate agents become the good guys?   doesn’t sound like estate agents are being thrown under a bus - they are fessing up. And Reeves doesn’t look to have done anything wrong  yet people will still believe the worst anyway    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/30/rachel-reeves-row-standards-adviser-looking-at-new-infomation?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...