Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Really? I thought Liverpool were definitely the

> better side over the 90. Not saying they are a

> better side, but wasn't impressed with City. We

> handed them a draw.


I thought the best football of the 90 was played by City in the opening half hour. In the end they were gifted a draw. Liverpool though did not look much of a goal threat apart from the set pieces from which they scored.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undisputedtruth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good to see Raheem Sterling playing well.

> >

> > A player which I mentioned before who had a

> bright

> > future.

>

> How's 'pick of the bunch' Josh Mceachran doing

> these days?..


http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/aug/20/josh-mceachran-chelsea-middlesbrough


He should have been loaned out a year ago. What is it with Chelsea that they can't fully develop their young talents?

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good to see Raheem Sterling playing well.

>

> A player which I mentioned before who had a bright

> future.



The best thing about it is that Downing is out of the team!


I am liking the look of Liverpool's developing team, but Borini is looking pretty rubbish.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The best thing about it is that Downing is out of

> the team!

>

> I am liking the look of Liverpool's developing

> team, but Borini is looking pretty rubbish.


I think Rodgers may have endeared himself to the Liverpool faithfuls by selecting players from their youth team.


Raheem Sterling is a future England international.

From BBC Gossip


"TRANSFER GOSSIP


Liverpool want Chelsea striker Daniel Sturridge, 22, and will sell midfielders Charlie Adam, 26, and Stewart Downing, 28, to raise the funds to buy him.


Full story: Daily Mirror


Liverpool midfielder Joe Cole, 30, could be set for a shock return to West Ham before the end of the transfer window.


Full story: talkSPORT"


Would be over the moon if the Sturridge, Adam, Downing story was true! Would be gutted to see Cole go, but his time at Liverpool hasn't really worked, and would be happy for him if he returned to West Ham and had a season without injury.


Still, it's probably all a load of rubbish.

bon3yard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has or hasnt?


...'hardly' according to the The Current Bun.


So what do Spurs fans think about this 'special relationship' you've struck up with Madrid on the back of the Modric sale?

Is it chairman speak for feeder club, next out will be Bale?..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...