Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > *sits on hands...*

>

>

> Say what you need to say, both are quotes from the

> same "little boy", and the Defoe bite went off

> with out much of a fuss. I don't advocate such

> behaviour by either player, just stinks of

> inconsistency.


Perhaps because suarez has plenty of previous and for defoe it was an unsightly blot on an otherwise spotless copybook


Either way- the overeaction is laughable.


It was petulant and a little pathetic from suarez; a reaction born out of frustration and certainly no worse than a two footed, studs showing lunge on another players shin (potentially career ending).

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nah! It's just that Van Pussy and Defoe play for

> the two clubs PD hates the most.



Not all Defoe got away with it all more or less, and Van Pussy is a c**t. 10 matches for a bite and yet Ben Thatcher got 8 for his assault on Mendes, Aguero gets off scot free as did McManaman on Haidara. That isn't just or fair.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 10 matches is a fecking joke! Yes he was a moron,

> and yes he deserves a ban, but I hope Liverpool

> appeal this, how can he get a bigger ban for this

> than they gave for the racism charge?!?


That's the FA for you, haven't got a scooby.

I've been doing some swatting and Defoe was booked and because of FIFA's stance on retrospective action the FA couldn't do anything. Defoe had just been fouled 3 times by the same player.


I think Suarez's punishment is harsh though given what some people have got 3 game bans for. I think if you break a players leg for example you shouldn't be allowed play again until that player has recovered. That might get rid of the really bad so called tackles.

Are we in a court?


In any normal workplace your previous warnings and misdemeanours would be taken into account


Minimum ban for biting in rugby is 12 weeks. More of this please.


Problem is they will give a smaller suspension for a worse misdemeanour fairly soon to undermine any good work

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • When I had a property with a basement there would often be a pool of water in the centre. I was told it was related to the fluctuating height of the water table in the area (se22) and would not become a problem and the only way to get rid of it would be to get the whole place completely tanked. 
    • We've got a Victorian coal hole cellar with a mud floor and after a couple of severe water leaks, I've taken more of an interest in the state of the dampness.  I've been running a dehumidifier for the past couple of weeks following a small water pipe leak and whilst most of the floor is now bone dry, there are damp patches along most of the wall adjoining the next house, a large damp patch in the middle of the floor that will not dry even with the dehumidifier right next to it and a patch of wet mud in a small hollow in the middle of the cellar.  An expert that lent us industrial drying equipment following a flood from a burst mains pipe said there will always be damp, but I'm a bit concerned in case there is a fundamental problem - any ideas from anyone with similar?
    • Best you post when you have an idea of dates  - waste  of everyone’s time
    • Hi there,  Looking for 10-12 jars (to start with) of local honey to fill a small section of a deli space in my work canteen. Please get in touch if you know of any community projects/small scale productions Cheers
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...