Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > *sits on hands...*

>

>

> Say what you need to say, both are quotes from the

> same "little boy", and the Defoe bite went off

> with out much of a fuss. I don't advocate such

> behaviour by either player, just stinks of

> inconsistency.


Perhaps because suarez has plenty of previous and for defoe it was an unsightly blot on an otherwise spotless copybook


Either way- the overeaction is laughable.


It was petulant and a little pathetic from suarez; a reaction born out of frustration and certainly no worse than a two footed, studs showing lunge on another players shin (potentially career ending).

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nah! It's just that Van Pussy and Defoe play for

> the two clubs PD hates the most.



Not all Defoe got away with it all more or less, and Van Pussy is a c**t. 10 matches for a bite and yet Ben Thatcher got 8 for his assault on Mendes, Aguero gets off scot free as did McManaman on Haidara. That isn't just or fair.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 10 matches is a fecking joke! Yes he was a moron,

> and yes he deserves a ban, but I hope Liverpool

> appeal this, how can he get a bigger ban for this

> than they gave for the racism charge?!?


That's the FA for you, haven't got a scooby.

I've been doing some swatting and Defoe was booked and because of FIFA's stance on retrospective action the FA couldn't do anything. Defoe had just been fouled 3 times by the same player.


I think Suarez's punishment is harsh though given what some people have got 3 game bans for. I think if you break a players leg for example you shouldn't be allowed play again until that player has recovered. That might get rid of the really bad so called tackles.

Are we in a court?


In any normal workplace your previous warnings and misdemeanours would be taken into account


Minimum ban for biting in rugby is 12 weeks. More of this please.


Problem is they will give a smaller suspension for a worse misdemeanour fairly soon to undermine any good work

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Going to be really inconvenient for folk to go that way as has been stated.. why not just move to Camberwell which I would assume is abit nearer and better travelling wise or have vets in both places from Lordship Lane Branch.. Must have been massive flood if going to take two months to dry out, electrical tests to make sure all good… From upstairs? Or where?
    • @selector73 Thanks!  Because we want him to be treated by the vets that know him we will have to get to the New X branch because thats where the team are based until LL reopens. Thank you again 🙏
    • There's 1 in camberwell hope that helps
    • Thank you !  We Will find a way to get him to New X because We owe his life to the vets he sees at Lordship Lane branch and they know him (and us) and we prefer the continuity of care because he's an elderly rescue cat who gets extremely anxious even though he's been needing monthly bloods he just never gets used to going and it can be a lengthy process just getting the sample. Can you tell I'm as anxious about the whole thing as he is??😥
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...