Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

titch juicy

titch juicy

Posted
Posted

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > *sits on hands...*

>

>

> Say what you need to say, both are quotes from the

> same "little boy", and the Defoe bite went off

> with out much of a fuss. I don't advocate such

> behaviour by either player, just stinks of

> inconsistency.


Perhaps because suarez has plenty of previous and for defoe it was an unsightly blot on an otherwise spotless copybook


Either way- the overeaction is laughable.


It was petulant and a little pathetic from suarez; a reaction born out of frustration and certainly no worse than a two footed, studs showing lunge on another players shin (potentially career ending).

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nah! It's just that Van Pussy and Defoe play for

> the two clubs PD hates the most.



Not all Defoe got away with it all more or less, and Van Pussy is a c**t. 10 matches for a bite and yet Ben Thatcher got 8 for his assault on Mendes, Aguero gets off scot free as did McManaman on Haidara. That isn't just or fair.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 10 matches is a fecking joke! Yes he was a moron,

> and yes he deserves a ban, but I hope Liverpool

> appeal this, how can he get a bigger ban for this

> than they gave for the racism charge?!?


That's the FA for you, haven't got a scooby.

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

I've been doing some swatting and Defoe was booked and because of FIFA's stance on retrospective action the FA couldn't do anything. Defoe had just been fouled 3 times by the same player.


I think Suarez's punishment is harsh though given what some people have got 3 game bans for. I think if you break a players leg for example you shouldn't be allowed play again until that player has recovered. That might get rid of the really bad so called tackles.

StraferJack

StraferJack

Posted
Posted

Are we in a court?


In any normal workplace your previous warnings and misdemeanours would be taken into account


Minimum ban for biting in rugby is 12 weeks. More of this please.


Problem is they will give a smaller suspension for a worse misdemeanour fairly soon to undermine any good work

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • first mate
      Nasty kids in Peckham Park

      By first mate · Posted

      I agree, the people in the park office seem to be invisible. Quite why we need a park office I am not sure. Perhaps it is to do with all the maintenance and upkeep for which there will be organisation and admin. It may be expensive but I do think funding some sort of regular park safety oversight should be a priority. Southwark to want young people to use the park, as do we all, but there probably does need to be some sort of supervision for everyone's sake.  
    • first mate
      Great news! Peckham Rye station to reclaim its public square by next year!

      By first mate · Posted

      The big difference, other than increasingly flaking paint, seems to be graffiti. The question is, will that/ can it be controlled?
    • alice
      Nasty kids in Peckham Park

      By alice · Posted

      I took back my 🤣 because I think the idea is unworkable expensive and would produce little result.  There seems to be people in the office next to the toilet but I don’t think they leave the office. I’m not sure what they do there.  The toilets have been in a disgusting state for months and months with many promises to repair they are not functional and they invite vandalism. I shall  try to add a couple of photos. The council doesn’t care why should we?
    • first mate
      Nasty kids in Peckham Park

      By first mate · Posted

      There will always be kids pushing the envelope as the saying goes, but having some boundaries should help most understand what they can and cannot do. I think dedicated, daily park wardens is exactly what is required...with a hotline to SNT teams on the beat. Is there no way money made from Gala or from Park parking fees can be diverted to provide that funding? I feel it would be a really good use of money. The principle aim being to maintain the park as a safe and relaxing environment for all. If funding really cannot be found I wonder if there might be funding to at least train volunteer park wardens?

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...