Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's been a strange season in the Prem with lots

> of high scoring games, so I reckon one of my 3-2

> predictions will come up...:-$



Well you were half right. Fortunately Wigan 2 Birmingham 3. 8th (for 24 hours).

Oh well, that's one fewer than I predicted, so that's almost like a win.


Ho hum.

England should get through that group though they may struggle against the USA; Italy have been given a bye and I think Spain should make short work of their group before going on to become world as well as European champions.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



>

> On the contrary I think Chelsea's inability to

> control the game in possession terms may show

> there is hope for the chasing teams,



Can I be really boring and quote my own comment from after the Arsenal Chelsea game....Was not completly convinced by Chelsea. And after today, its a little closer.

Just watched MOTD. Nice win for City! Very impressed!!


Brilliant clearance from Carvallio (spelling). Pretty amazing.


Eboue's goal line clearance from Fabregas was pretty good too! :)


3 Points, Bottom of the Table, no more points until Xmas (maybe) as we play Wet Sham on Boxing Day.


Cannot wait for championship footy and affordable prices! Really, I can't!

My predictions for World Cup groups. I think Group D is the most competitive. I'm going for South Africa to qualify from Group A - as having home support usually gives a huge advantage at a World Cup.


Group A: South Africa, Mexico, Uruguay, France - FRANCE, SOUTH AFRICA

Group B: Argentina, Nigeria, Korea Republic, Greece - ARGENTINA, NIGERIA

Group C: England, USA, Algeria, Slovenia - ENGLAND, SLOVENIA

Group D: Germany, Australia, Serbia, Ghana, - GERMANY, SERBIA

Group E: Netherlands, Denmark, Japan, Cameroon - NETHERLANDS, CAMEROON

Group F: Italy, Paraguay, New Zealand, Slovakia - ITALY, SLOVAKIA

Group G: Brazil, Korea DPR, C?te d'Ivoire, Portugal - BRAZIL, PORTUGAL

Group H: Spain, Switzerland, Honduras, Chile - SPAIN, CHILE

Pleased with our win yesterday, and Chavski reverted to type when things went against them yesterday. John Terry arguing with the ref over every decision as was fat boy lampard, drogber falling over like he'd been shot every two minutes, at cashley hole walking away from the ref when he attempted to show him yellow. Bell end. How Belleti stayed on the pitch I don't know. You have to worry about Terry's attitude, if you're an England fan. If that's his attitude when things go against his club, what's he gonna do when other nations players wind him up? There'll be tears.
We were surprised no Chelski got sent off, what was it? 7 yellows? Unfortunate that Ade scored for both teams but we were the better team. Bring on Spuds- Proper Manchester team humiliating London !!!! (That's not controversial is it ! http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m316/LGilbert421954/Banners%20Smilies/cheeky-smiley-005.gif)

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bluerevolution Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Personally, I don't think so-just making a

> > truthful observation- the ONE premiership team

> > from Manchester is doing well

>

> Yup, United certainly are doing well.

They are, agreed but they don't play in Manchester

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...