Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only slight disappointment yesterday for me, was

> the fact we didn't use our new striker. Would've

> loved it if he could've scored.


I'd have thought that not having to use him made it an even better win.

I was only half paying attention yesterday so at one point when I'd woken up I reached the conclusion Lampard wasn't playing. Finally I saw him. He can't have been much involved though.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still, at least we weren't 4 goals clear....;)



At least we didn't lose to team bottom of premier league, and our side doesn't "boast" a player on ?250K a week. What great value for money he's provided for his clubs investment.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haha. I think being four up and only getting a

> point is a bit more gutting. It seems whatever you

> are paying your team it's not enough to defend a

> four goal lead.



Still didn't lose to bottom club, and still don't pay over the odds for players. Lead now only four points and the Mancs have got to play us, Chavski, and Liverpool.

Well, I guess we'll see. I think there's a few in your team who you've paid over the odds for. Rosicky, Arshavin, Bendtner for example. The Arsenal have had an excellent season and looking back over the results they've had they are unlucky to be second. It's going to be an interesting run in.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, I guess we'll see. I think there's a few in

> your team who you've paid over the odds for.

> Rosicky, Arshavin, Bendtner for example. The

> Arsenal have had an excellent season and looking

> back over the results they've had they are unlucky

> to be second. It's going to be an interesting run

> in.


We'll see indeed.

CELTIC could be set to lose one of their top players as Manchester United prepare a summer swoop for defender Emilio Izaguirre, according to reports.


The Honduran international impressed during last year?s World Cup in South Africa and has been on the radar of some top clubs ever since.


Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson was at Ibrox for Sunday?s Scottish Cup tie between the Old Firm casting his eye over Izaguirre and it?s now believed he will track him for the rest of the season as a long-term replacement for Patrice Evra

kpc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Man Utd Mayfair Office

>

> Man Utd's global commercial department is having

> to move to bigger offices at a rent of just under

> ?1m a year to accommodate their team of 45

> employees!


What? No offices in Manchester?

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Annasfield Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Still in the same City though Jah.

> >

> > Any club having their office over 200 miles

> away

> > does seem a bit daft.

>

>

> True dat, well in Anna.


Erm, it's the corporate office...sponsorship, global client stuff. The club administration is still at OT and Carrington. Maybe you should read the article rather than just picking out random words that suit your (rather poor) joke.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...