Jump to content

Moxon's Next Door Opens Tomorrow


Recommended Posts

Went last night and enjoyed it. Excellent food and wine.


Won't be able to afford to go again for some time though. It was a birthday (not mine).


They very kindly put a candle on the lemon tart and gave us complimentary glasses of dessert wine.


The place was full, on a Tuesday night, and everybody seemed to be having a good time.


The service was friendly. They deserve to do well and I'm sure they will.


ETA: Oh, and having read the post above, nobody appeared to be looking at anybody else. No more than anywhere else, anyway. What a weird idea.


ETA again: Ignore the ETA above, as Redjam rightly points out below, I hadn't properly read the previous post - duh. sorry.

Yes Sue, but the 'elite' are like that - they make out like they are not watching and judging you, but in reality...


... and don't get me started on the hysteria - walking up Lordship Lane last night the atmosphere of hysteria was palpable. It would really have been quite disturbing for any of ED's few intelligent, decent, ethical residents who might have been passing by. The sight of the usual dim-witted poseurs jostling to be 'seen' getting ice cream next door to Moxons nearly put me off my gravel broth supper and would have deterred any right minded individual from venturing any further up LL to Moxons.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I will try it eventually, maybe. But as Foxy

> hinted at previously, I shall wait for the usual

> ED hysteria to die back a bit. I?ll allow the ED

> elite to partake in some ?look at me? antics

> before I venture in.

>

> Louisa.


What actual planet do you live on?

Oh for the good old days before all these poseurs arrived in ED and you could have a good old fashioned punch up in one of them boozers in LL before having a chin wag with Mad Frankie Fraser in the hairdressers in North Cross Road. Frankie was cruel but he was fair.

El Presidente Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I will try it eventually, maybe. But as Foxy

> > hinted at previously, I shall wait for the

> usual

> > ED hysteria to die back a bit. I?ll allow the

> ED

> > elite to partake in some ?look at me? antics

> > before I venture in.

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> What actual planet do you live on?



The real world planet, you know the one most people who on this forum have no clue about?


Louisa.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes Sue, but the 'elite' are like that - they make

> out like they are not watching and judging you,

> but in reality...

>

> ... and don't get me started on the hysteria -

> walking up Lordship Lane last night the atmosphere

> of hysteria was palpable. It would really have

> been quite disturbing for any of ED's few

> intelligent, decent, ethical residents who might

> have been passing by. The sight of the usual

> dim-witted poseurs jostling to be 'seen' getting

> ice cream next door to Moxons nearly put me off my

> gravel broth supper and would have deterred any

> right minded individual from venturing any further

> up LL to Moxons.


People like you don?t live in the real world. If you genuinely believe some residents don?t attend these places for attention seeking purposes then you?re more ridiculous than I initially gave you credit for. ?Decent intelligent ethical residents?, get over yourself robbin. Full of BS as usual.


Louisa.

I?ve covered this topic before. Not everyone does it, some people just want a meal out. But it does seem that a disproportionate number of local residents enjoy the limelight of a new restaurant opening, including being sat in visible view of passers-by. Sorry if that?s offensive.


Louisa.

redjam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Um, I think binkyliliput was sarcastically

> responding to Louisa's bonkers post upthread, Sue.



Yeh, sorry, you're right. I read it too quickly, but if I edit my post again to take the original edit out, your post won't make sense :))

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?ve covered this topic before.



Yes, you have. At great bloody length.


So why do you feel the need to start again with your ridiculous posts every time a new place opens?


I don't know why you bother to stay in East Dulwich when you seem to hate the people who live here so much.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> redjam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Um, I think binkyliliput was sarcastically

> > responding to Louisa's bonkers post upthread,

> Sue.

>

>

> Yeh, sorry, you're right. I read it too quickly,

> but if I edit my post again to take the original

> edit out, your post won't make sense :))



Not to worry, there?s already a lot of posts on this thread that don?t make sense :)

Excuse me Sue, someone else raised this issue, not me.


Actually, numerous people did.


Why is it so uncomfortable for some on here to admit their attention seeking? No one is saying it?s a bad thing per se, but admitting it shouldn?t be a problem. Anyway, hope you enjoyed your meal.


I will be heading off to McDonalds later and couldn?t two hoots who?s looking at me whilst I tuck into my Big Mac and chips.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Excuse me Sue, someone else raised this issue, not

> me.



Ah yes. Would that be your mate Dulwich Fox's charming post on page 2 of the thread?



"There will be the Usual E.D. Elite reporting back after their expensive experience at this new venue.

There were a few local business owner 'Faces' when I walked past last night at 10.30pm


Other eateries are available in the area."



Nice post on a thread started by the restaurant owners, wasn't it?



Can't see anything else "raised" until your post on page 3: "But as Foxy hinted at previously, I shall wait for the usual ED hysteria to die back a bit. I?ll allow the ED elite to partake in some ?look at me? antics before I venture in."

Sue please just stop this. It?s beyond funny now.


I?m not suggesting you went along just to be seen, but what I would add is that you could have waited like most people do 2/3 months in before you booked a table. Why book one now when you know it?s fresh and everyone is watching you go in? That?s all I?m saying. If you enjoy the publicity and the limelight thatsfair enough, own it. Don?t shy away and accuse me of being strange for having that opinion of people.


Louisa.

Because it was my partner's birthday and he wanted to go there as it was a new place we had never been to before.


You really are beyond parody.


ETA: Who is this "everyone" watching people go in? FFS. For some reason the word "Troll" keeps springing to mind, I can't think why.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Because it was my partner's birthday and he wanted

> to go there as it was a new place we had never

> been to before.

>

> You really are beyond parody.

>

> ETA: Who is this "everyone" watching people go in?

> FFS. For some reason the work "Troll" keeps

> springing to mind, I can't think why.



Rather than just admit that some people do visit certain establishments to be seen doing so, you have to accuse me of trolling. It?s pathetic Sue.


Some people like attention seeking, nothing wrong with that. Personally, I?d rather pop in when all the fuss has died back.


Louisa.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I recently had a utility room built, next to the kitchen. Dean Richards and his team carried out the works, they did a fantastic job. Thorough, with attention to every detail.  If you are considering an extension, refurbishment or renovation, Dean comes highly recommended.  Dean Richards  07888 651798  
    • Thanks to all for the comments and advice.  I have now reported the incident to the police.
    • Thanks everyone for your comments, all of which I’ve taken something from. I originally posted to warn and help others learn from my experience – hence the title, first and last words of the post. However, the process of posting and reading your comments has helped me better make sense of what felt ‘off’ about the incident, why and what I’d do differently next time. I hadn’t expected this outcome, so thank you.  It’s also yielded several ‘golden nugget’ insights, one of which I share here for others. For context, I’m a longtime SE22 resident, who lives on a street with a primary school, so am used to scooting, cycling, walking with buggies, small children, pets etc. I like where I live and have never been struck on a pavement by anyone, on wheels or otherwise. I’ve been fortunate. When walking down Carlton Avenue towards Dulwich Village yesterday, I was on the left-hand side of the pavement but – ‘golden nugget’ approaching – not as close to people’s front garden walls as I could have been. The cyclist came from behind and overtook on the inside i.e. passed between me and the wall. The gap was too narrow and he hit my leg. For clarity, my original post was about the lack of adult supervision of a child. There’s been much comment here about the cyclist’s age. I didn’t know he was 4, until his father told me. I felt that this was a tactic – along with telling me I was over-reacting, talking about intent, apologising undercut with ‘but’ and laughing – to downplay and avoid taking responsibility for his part in the situation. But I accept that is my perception, readers weren’t there and may think differently. What also felt ‘off’ is that the father didn’t see what happened or ask any questions to find out. What happened? Where did he hit you? How hard? Are you alright? Is my son alright? Is everyone alright? This sounds obvious but wasn’t to me until last night. Back to age. Is the age of the cyclist important? If you consider it from the perspective of a four-year-old, it might be. He’s on his bike, helmet on, speeding along, sees a gap and thinks he can get through it. He doesn’t know and/or may never have been told about the risks (to himself and others) of undertaking on the left. Hits pedestrian. I was not expecting to be hit from behind or the undertaking. But had I walked closer to the wall – and not left a potentially inviting gap – this probably wouldn’t have happened. This is just one ‘golden nugget’ I will take away. It’s something I can easily do, doesn’t depend on anyone else doing anything differently, and could contribute towards keeping myself and others safe. All in all, posting here has been unexpectedly useful for me. I hope for others, too. I feel able to move forward with learnings, so thank you guys.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...