Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jermy i hayte to see myhts bening chrned uot over an ovr again wehn no fought is givan to teh biggr pichure an undestading of drivrs behinde eventes i also hered that them bildenbergerss and the intrnatnal jewsh conspracy an teh protcols ov eldrs ov zion aree behind tihs curent malaise

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I get that, but what then?


We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.


But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting.


By a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more?

I have looked at the website 'liberal conspiracy' it does seem a bit far fetched to me. However I don't think there is any conspiracy to jumping into bed with the conservatives and splitting your own party in two for a seat at the table, that's pretty transparent.


No one had any idea that Gold prices were headed where they are now, its such a silly comment , well worn and pointless.

torehy saetts taht you can cgnahe the oerdr of lrttees whiitn a wrod and it soulhd slitl be lbgeie.


Mind you the example given on the story that did the rounds was a lot more legible than the above.


Richard, it must take quite a bit of effort to do what you're doing. Do you have a clever plugin to notepad you wrote yourself that obfuscates what you write as you type it?

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you have a clever plugin to

> notepad you wrote yourself that obfuscates what

> you write as you type it?


There's a website which mangles your spelling, someone posted it the other day.

My favoured method is to run something through and back in an obscure language on babelfish.


becomes ->


The method which is visible my favor in babelfish from dark language silence from the first when will split until end and running is for after. [Korean]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...