Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks mockney for the heads up I wasn't aware but have done my duty to the forum.


thank you for your donationPayment by PayPal

Confirmation number: 5D14183740390222Y.

An email with your donation details has been sent to [email protected] and you can print your donation receipt.

Donations Coordinator Contact Information

[email protected]

ibilly99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oi Hugenot this is a local forum for local people

> by living in Singapore you've obviously voted with

> your feet and given this country the brush off

> can't you bug the Singapore Expats Forum with your

> carefully nuanced erudition. No taxation without

> representation.


I find my time spread between Martock, Winnipeg and Shreveport.....


Get you some good perspective...

As far as I can ascertain the End of the World as we know it (and I feellll fine..., thus far)...is: We've hit the end of growth by running out of resources like oil and natural gas. Our entire economic system is based on the essential need for growth, if growth stops, the economy collapses. We can't live without some sort of economic system, I can't grow my own food, heat my house, travel anywhere beyond Peckham Rye, employ myself or give myself a salary without some kind of working economic system so even a knitted Peruvian hat wearing lefty like myself needs a stable economic system.


In 2008 the entire system almost came down like a big house of cards, everywhere. That one company's (Lehman Brothers) failure almost brought everyone down indicates a systemic problem with every economic system in the world. An entire country (Iceland) defaulted on its loans. Lucky for most of us, it was a little country. Governments pumped credit into the system which gave everyone a bit of breathing space but didn't solve the problem. No growth plus lots of new cheap credit means you just make the amount of money defaulted on down the line bigger.


So countries in debt can grow out of debt (not if we've run out of resources to grow) default (A la Iceland. Not nice for people who loaned you the money like pension funds.), print up a lot of money to pay off debts (inflation and possibly hyper inflation with the proverbial wheelbarrow of money to buy a loaf of bread (And places like Greece cannot do this anyway. As long as they run with Euros, they aren't going to be allowed to print up lots of money), or borrow more money and pay off the debt later. And for the past three years, we've just borrowed more money.


The worry is, bond markets, which as far as I understand it is where country's borrow money, are likely to stop loaning out money. They'll stop loaning to Eurozone countries before they stop loaning to American markets (so we in the UK are going down first).


I imagine Huguenot you think governments are going to figure some clever way to limp along like this until, over time, the system somehow changes itself into something more stable. The argument would go, we've managed to keep things fairly stable in the last three years, its not been pretty but we've avoided a big nasty apoplectic collapse thus far. I would imagine the argument would be, to say the financial system would suddenly and completely collapse is unlikely and to hold such an opinion is extreme and unfounded.


I can't see how the bond market will continue loaning money indefinitely and I can't see how our economic system can deal with contraction and the end of growth without blowing up but I hope you guys who think that the theory of collapse is too extreme are right. This would be a nice argument to lose.


Scylla

That's a great article - perfectly reasoned and nuanced.


Doesn't needlessly grandstand or speculate about disaster, highlights that we'll be thinking about things in new ways and that the balance of economic power will shift (although not necessarily east).


More that that, it points out that we're all in this together and the we all have an interest in finding a solution. We don't hear any of the old style Americaneee about yellows and reds out to destroy the West.


Not a fart about apocalypse.

@hugo,


I hope NN would modify his approach as I think this topic is worth discussing. Especially as the economic crisis is not likely to go away any time soon. To understand where NN is coming from, you have to understand the basics. The disparity between the two means that neither parties concern will benefit from the discussions.

Which two parties? You're not referring to me are you? You think I benefit from having to drain my energy to explain simple financial concepts and arrangements to you two wallies?


Ha ha ha!


I simply don't think that it's fair that your ridiculous, frequently fabricated but usually misquoted, poorly informed, abusive and destructive scaremongering should go unchallenged.


Are you claiming that you 'understand the basics' and I don't?


Ha ha ha! :))


*Wipes tear from eye*


What a comedian!!!


http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ4aAnRur6SL10jfK7DTXO1FyaqEI0Z22ZoMjzorKQLggrJmii5

Well Hugo,


I remember the power cuts in seventies. Also the winter of discontent. Stock trading was suspended during the 911 aftermath. Mobile phone networks were turned off during the 7 July London bombings. This summer we've had the worst riots for a century. So anything is possible.


Deep down, I seriously believe you don't know the basics and this harms constructive discussion.

Voyageur Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh dear... this thread is annoyingly stuck in a

> rut, but I keep getting drawn back to it like a

> moth to a flame - that and the fact that I am

> holding out for the unlikely miracle of both sides

> politely shaking hands and agreeing to differ!



Hmmmm


Me too, it's like crack.


Horrible but strangely compelling


(td)

Scylla didn't really ask a question, more proffered a position.


Whilst I appreciated a less strident and a more mature tone, it was absolutely littered with conflated concepts and misunderstandings.

For instance the market for bonds* is much stronger during times of uncertainty, low growth in the west is due to a lack of confidence more than anything, growth elsewhere is very healthy and has nothing, and nothing has anything to do with running out of resources, that's something for a good half a century or more depending on the resource in question.


Also debt can be managed by growth (increased tax receipts), or spending less, hence all these bloody cuts everywhere everyone is complaining about.


All said, I'm not sure how anyone was meant to 'answer' it.


But then this thread has seen 20 bloody pages of half baked theories and earnest rebuttals, I'm not sure another one will help anyone.


*I'm not sure what a 'bond market' with some sort of anthropomorphic motives attached to it is.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hugo, it's a sign that your juvenile retorts is

> really a cover for lack of financial

> understanding.

>

> Scylla directed an interesting question towards

> you and yet failed to give an answer.


Sorry to say you are wasting your time with Huguenot, he is one of those closed off types, he will not yield to any form of logical nor reasonable debate.


You can show him facts, figures, news reports, economic lectures,

And if he does bother looking at your body of evidence, he just comes back with the same old ?I know better? answer, then hurls abuse around, like it is normal to talk to people that way.


At least king Canute did what he did to show people the limits of his powers, Huguenot thinks he really can hold back the seas, and walk on them too.


I now wait for the vanguard to strike.

Ha ha ha :))


The main problem you have New Nexus is that none of the facts, figures, news reports or economic lectures support your opinion. They all support a much more rational and sensible interpretation.


The stuff you didn't make up anyway ;-)


Still, with you there to 'stave off the vanguard' we can all sleep soundly in our beds. Can I get you a spear or a sacred stone?

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone convinced that nexus and udt are not the

> same person?


I'm starting to think that nexus, udt AND Hugo are possibly the same person.


Scary, but it is possible


* lets out scream whilst trapped in a bell jar *


Nette:-S

There are surprisingly few people who use the name 'Hugo' to refer to me. Of those few you'll find in a search, I know that several of them are the same person, so that does somewhat limit the options for UDT's other incarnations if he has them.


However, New Nexus only ever rarely refers to me with some distaste as 'Huguenot' so either it's someone else or part of an extraordinarily ornate alter ego.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...