Jump to content

Request for comment: Collapse of the U. S. A.

New Nexus

By New Nexus
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

New Nexus

New Nexus

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are surprisingly few people who use the name

> 'Hugo' to refer to me. Of those few you'll find in

> a search, I know that several of them are the same

> person, so that does somewhat limit the options

> for UDT's other incarnations if he has them.

>

> However, New Nexus only ever rarely refers to me

> with some distaste as 'Huguenot' so either it's

> someone else or part of an extraordinarily ornate

> alter ego.


Economic commentator, political commentator, sleuth and now psychologist.


Here?s a new name for you, Jack as in,


?Jack of all trades and master of none?



Ho no he didn?t, Ho yea he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

Yeah, I'm not sure I agree with you Mockers, in fact I think you have them the other way round.


The use of 'Hugo' as a term of address only highlights one person who also combines that with habitual Latin board-veteran phrases. Couple that with the age and other references and I think UDT is pretty much a dead-cert.


New Nexus has all sorts of strange habits - for example 90% of their posts start with quoting someone else. Something that I can't find anyone else doing to the same degree unless you go back to the early days of Snorky. I'm surprised if it's Snorky though, the subject matter matches, but Nexus seems a little bit too defensive.


The only other person I thought Nexus might be with all this Americ-awe was Rick Channing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
New Nexus

New Nexus

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, I'm not sure I agree with you Mockers, in

> fact I think you have them the other way round.

>

> The use of 'Hugo' as a term of address only

> highlights one person who also combines that with

> habitual Latin board-veteran phrases. Couple that

> with the age and other references and I think UDT

> is pretty much a dead-cert.

>

> New Nexus has all sorts of strange habits - for

> example 90% of their posts start with quoting

> someone else. Something that I can't find anyone

> else doing to the same degree unless you go back

> to the early days of Snorky. I'm surprised if it's

> Snorky though, the subject matter matches, but

> Nexus seems a little bit too defensive.

>

> The only other person I thought Nexus might be

> with all this Americ-awe was Rick Channing.


You may want to go back over some of my posting, I think you may have your details confused.


Or maybe it was Mea culpa

Link to comment
Share on other sites
katie1997

katie1997

Posted
Posted

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you have an undisputed relative on here by any

> chance?


Me to NN - Page 2


StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone convinced that nexus and udt are not the

> same person?


Page 30000 or whatever....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

I'm not confused Nexus - out of your 140 posts, well over a hundred start with quoting someone else. That's all I said, and you can count them yourself.


I know what you're saying nashoi, particularly the 'fiat currency' from Nexus is all very red-eye. I just think the first post in this thread is toe-curling, bicep flexing Tom Clancy. It doesn't seem so monocular, and neither does the habitual quoting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mockney piers

mockney piers

Posted
Posted

Quite NN

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,729998,735065#msg-735065

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,729998,735224#msg-735224


At which point, huguenot, you thought it was UDT, but your attribution was wrong.

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,729998,735240#msg-735240


So I'm going with my instincts on this.

UDTs words mean may be going back to my original gut instinct about who he is, despite some claims elsewhere to the contrary.



Oooooh, this is all so coded and cliquey. You see NN & UDT, this is all it takes to be in the clique, just a bit of forum eerience, there never was any illuminati apron or trowel thing going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
New Nexus

New Nexus

Posted
  • Author
Posted

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quite NN

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?2

> 0,729998,735065#msg-735065

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?2

> 0,729998,735224#msg-735224

>

> At which point, huguenot, you thought it was UDT,

> but your attribution was wrong. that it be

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?2

> 0,729998,735240#msg-735240

>

> So I'm going with my instincts on this.

> UDTs words mean may be going back to my original

> gut instinct about who he is, despite some claims

> elsewhere to the contrary.

>

>

> Oooooh, this is all so coded and cliquey. You see

> NN & UDT, this is all it takes to be in the

> clique, just a bit of forum eerience, there never

> was any illuminati apron or trowel thing going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
katie1997

katie1997

Posted
Posted

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Go away Katie, you know full well I'm not New

> Nexus. In fact I shall speak to Laddy Muck about

> you.


UDT - I only said what I thought, however, please accept my sincere apologies if you aren't also the poster NN.


As an aside, I don't quite see what Laddy Muck has to do with the price of jam but at least it made me smile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
katie1997

katie1997

Posted
Posted

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Katie, you know we met at Laddy Muck's Birthday

> drinks and your assertion to say I was NN was less

> than honest.


I was being perfectly honest. You have the same posting style as NN - iin my opinion. Again, apologies to you (both) if I'm mistaken. Meeting someone in person doesn't prove anything either.


> @Hugo - I'm not Rick Channing either.


That was patently obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Undisputedtruth

Undisputedtruth

Posted
Posted

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I was being perfectly honest. You have the same

> posting style as NN - iin my opinion. Again,

> apologies to you (both) if I'm mistaken. Meeting

> someone in person doesn't prove anything either.


I disagree. It just seems to me that a group of people can't win their arguments fairly so thay just try to get the opposition banned by mixing them up with previous banned members. I think this behaviour is wrong. It's dishonest and goes against the forum's t&c.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
StraferJack

StraferJack

Posted
Posted

I haven't seen anyone try and get anyone banned


Those is your words udt


Like Katie I see a similarity in two posters logic. So I merely asked if others thought the same. I couldn't care less if you are or aren't. but I'm certainly not trying to get you banned. Or nexus for that matter


But accuse away

Link to comment
Share on other sites
New Nexus

New Nexus

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > I was being perfectly honest. You have the same

> > posting style as NN - iin my opinion. Again,

> > apologies to you (both) if I'm mistaken.

> Meeting

> > someone in person doesn't prove anything either.

>

>

> I disagree. It just seems to me that a group of

> people can't win their arguments fairly so thay

> just try to get the opposition banned by mixing

> them up with previous banned members. I think this

> behaviour is wrong. It's dishonest and goes

> against the forum's t&c.


It is called guilt by association.


Has anyone seen The Crucible lately?


I plead the 5th

Link to comment
Share on other sites
katie1997

katie1997

Posted
Posted

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Strangely enough, Straferjack, in another thread

> you thought I was mikecg. Another banned member.


New nexus is not a banned member. This thread has nothing to do with the one in the DR, haven't you moved on from that by now? No-one is trying to get anyone banned, just commenting on how similar your posts are and apologies have been given for any offence caused if not.


The forum is a boring place if all views are the same but ....this thread....awful.


As SJ said, accuse away...


.... and pass the butter please. Someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • lollol
      How oversubscribed are the local schools? Will they be able to take on students who are currently privately-educated?

      By lollol · Posted

      Southwark and Lambeth may have some spaces but this is not the case of other London boroughs nearby particularly at secondary level. Also this is not just a London issue. There are many regions throughout the UK that have no school places available (eg Kent due to new housing developments, rural areas, Surrey, Guildford, Edinburgh etc). Just because you feel it doesn’t affect you, does not mean it’s right.  You also need to consider the proportion of foreign students in many of the private schools in the area which distorts the impression that local people can pay private school fees and suck up an additional £4-5k per child and per year. And sadly, the psychological and emotional impact on children is not even being discussed.
    • lollol
      Education not taxation - please consider signing this petition!

      By lollol · Posted

      Step in a child’s shoes just for one moment and think what it would be like to have to move schools in the middle of the year away from your friends, teachers, community etc. due to a political stunt. I doubt the money will even go into education. The UK will be become the only European country to tax education. Primary schools have some capacity where I live but I have enquired and there are currently no places for secondary school where I live. Again, so easy to be smug and say we should have pre planned a potential outcome 5 years ago when you live in your £2-3m homes next to the best state schools in Dulwich (like Keir Starmer!)
    • Ms Spen
      Hemnes Daybed

      By Ms Spen · Posted

      Please let me know if anyone is selling a Hemnes daybed in the near future. Thanks 
    • malumbu
      How oversubscribed are the local schools? Will they be able to take on students who are currently privately-educated?

      By malumbu · Posted

      Birth rate collapses sounds a bit like Armageddon.  It's a mixture of a decline following a bulge, where many schools had to increase intake, and families moving out of the capital due to high cost of housing.  Now that is an irony, that only wealthy families, many who can afford private schooling, can afford to live in many parts of London.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...