Jump to content

Dulwich Library or Buggy Park??

Dondee

By Dondee
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

Dondee

Dondee

Posted
Posted

Does anyone else find the amount of pushchairs taking up the children?s part of the library extremely annoying? Surely it?s time to try & find an alternative to stepping over hundreds of bugaboos with babies & toddlers.

I left today with my two 2 year olds, as we couldn?t even enjoy a simple visit. I appreciate people have to take the prams but isn?t there somewhere outside that could be used as a buggy area? Something like the one at the butterfly house in the Horniman. It?s so annoying, and unsafe!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pugwash

Pugwash

Posted
Posted

Why not mention this to the senior librarian - perhaps they will have a designated section for buggies etc. Or if you child is not sleeping, prams/buggies need to be folded.


Buggies etc were a problem in the Bread of Life Caf? (Christ Church) so they had a separate area set aside for the prams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pugwash

Pugwash

Posted
Posted

Why not mention this to the senior librarian - perhaps they will have a designated section for buggies etc. Or if you child is not sleeping, prams/buggies need to be folded.


Buggies etc were a problem in the Bread of Life Caf? (Christ Church) so they had a separate area set aside for the prams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Robert Poste's Child

Robert Poste's Child

Posted
Posted
It's good news in a way as it's a sign of how popular the children's events are. They don't have a dedicated area but I know the staff do their best to corale them into the far corner behind the lift. Agree best to have a word with staff next time you're in and perhaps use one of their feedback forms to suggest setting up a covered space outside.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Earl Aelfheah
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By Earl Aelfheah · Posted

      57% of those who actually lived in the consultation area I believe. Around 3,000. Presumably 2,000 of whom are the ‘supporters of One Dulwich (but not members of One Dulwich? So how does one ‘join’?) It seems fairly clear that Southwark could have done more first time round as they did open the junction back up to emergency services. I’m not sure why this suggests someone shawdowy is ‘pulling their strings’ though as you suggest. You say read up on it - why not share the evidence that emergency services were knocking on the council’s door for months and months?  You’ve just posted a claim the the LFB haven’t been consulted this time round, yet their spokesman says  “Regarding the FOI, the local authority did consult the Brigade. However, they didn’t initially contact the specific Southwark team, who responded on the FOI saying they hadn’t been contacted.” I have answered all your questions (where they are actual questions). You ducked and deflected my two for several pages, before awkwardly distancing yourself from the claims made in the missive you shared 😳 A question that says “do you agree with a design that does nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders” is what’s called a loaded question. Whether one say yes or no it accepts the premise. It’s the classic ‘have you stopped beating your wife” construction, and it’s not very subtle. 🙄    
    • Earl Aelfheah
      Here it is - thanks to all on the forum who helped us create a history of ed's home, 41 North Cross Rd

      By Earl Aelfheah · Posted

      This is great 👏 
    • OutOfFocus
      One (part of) Dulwich

      By OutOfFocus · Posted

      Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
    • Rockets
      Latest One Dulwich update

      By Rockets · Posted

      We are actually referred to as "Supporters"...2,100 of us across Dulwich...read and weep! 😉   https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters   Got it, the one where 64% of respondents in the consultation area said they wanted the measures "returned to their original state". Is that the one you claim had a yes/no response question?   Well I suggest you read up on it as it is an important part of the story of utter mismangement by the councils and this is why so many of us can't work out who is pulling the council's strings on this one because surely you can agree that if the emergency services were knocking on your door for months and months telling you the blocks in the roads were delayihg response times and putting lives at risk you'd do something about it? Pretty negligent not to do so don't you think - if I was a councillor it would not sit well with me?   Careful it could be a Mrs, Miss or Mx One.....   Of course you don't that's because you have strong opinions but hate being asked for detail to.back-up those opinions (especially when it doesn't serve their narrative) and exposes the flaws in your arguments! 😉  As so many of the pro-LTN lobby find to their cost the devil is always in the detail.....

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...