Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just checked Easyjet's website for our flight tomorrow and it says:


"You can breast feed on board at any time except during take off and landing."


Can anyone a) explain to me why I can't feed my son at the two key times in a flight that you would want to and b) has anyone done it anyway, without any consequences? Tempted to ignore the rules.

We flew ?easijet or was it ryanair when one of mine was about 8 weeks old and am sure was breastfeeding at one of the take offs/landings, I particularly remember flying with virgin when my middle child was just over 1 and having to feed her at take off as she was quite distressed, the cabin crew didn't bat an eyelid, I think they probably thought she was asleep. It definately soothes them at landing if they have pain in their ears, I mean what can they do? make you stop feeding and inflict a wailing baby on the rest of the passengers...The spiel on the website is probably just the oficial line.

Have a great holiday!

I'd noticed that statement but it's not applied. If anything you'll find the crew will suggest that you give the baby something to drink/dummy to suck on on take off and landing to avoid the ear pain. I flew a fair bit with my daughter when she was breastfed and never encountered a problem on any airline, including EJ and Ryanair. I wouldn't worry about it.

We flew with easy jet last month and I breastfed my daughter on take off both ways and landing once and was fine. As others say you can feed them with the baby seatbelt on (although probably not the safest position which probably why they say this as I guess they need to cover themselves)

Have also fed my older 2 on easy jet take off/landings in the past and never an issue.

actually I do remember once when I was at the front of a fairly empty flight to edinburgh, think it was BA though, and my son was cuddling in to me (wasn't bf but was snuggling so facing in, if you see what I mean), the cabin crew officiously told me to have him facing outward. Was quite taken aback as he was over 1 by then and quite wriggly - really, what could I do?! and if it was helping calm him down...but anyway, am sure if had actually been feeding cd have made a case for it.

I was on BA a couple of weeks ago. LO was find on the way out, but tired on the way back and was wriggling and screaming the place down (much to the horror of the other passengers who were mostly business people, I'm sure!). But the crew were lovely. They bought me some water for her before take off (she's not BF any more), and not once did they mention the facing forward bit. In the end by the time we had finished taxi-ing (it was Schipol!) she had fallen asleep on hubby's lap, facing sideways (with belt on). Still not a problem.


I don't get why they need to face forward anyway. I'm sure I've read before about it actually being safer to face backwards on a journey (trains/planes etc) its just not practical/as pleasant for most people so they don't do it.


You'll be fine, I'm sure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...