Jump to content

Recommended Posts

flocker spotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you realise that this thread is an easter egg by

> the OP. designed to provide side splitting mirth

> for the poster for weeks to come.



Indeed. Wounds she has healed ..... Convention she has ripped apart ..... dull and pointless agreement ....


If anybody still thought Louisa's posts were intended to be taken seriously, surely her first post on this thread must change their minds?

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa?

>

>

> Has she gone?


Who cares?! Having said that, I would be quite content to live without occasional abusive private messages from her and even more content not to have to read her ED hating/nimby drivel.

flocker spotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please tell me that you are joking - why would

> anyone send an unsolicited hate PM to someone they

> have not met ? this surely cannot be commonplace


Indeed. I've never received any such pm from anyone else on the EDF. To be fair to L though, when I messaged her to say that I wasn't going to open any other pm from her, but would consider simply forwarding them to Admin, she didn't send any more.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Louisa?

> >

> >

> > Has she gone?

>

> Who cares?! Having said that, I would be quite

> content to live without occasional abusive private

> messages from her and even more content not to

> have to read her ED hating/nimby drivel.


Nobody here on EDF Has to read anyone's 'ED hating/nimby drivel' as you so put it.


Fox

  • 8 months later...

Hello everyone.


After a period of abstention I have had time to reflect on my reckless behaviour last year. I realised that I needed time to reinvent my image on the forum, and as my long standing username had been rightly deleted by admin, it was only correct for me to step away from the forum and consider my actions. I had put the administrator in a terrible position numerous times and they had every right to delete my account. If I have upset anyone previously I would like to apologise now. I hope everyone is well. I will try not to involve myself in any class related conversations, and aim to be as nice as I can muster for 2019.


Louisa.

If this is you, Louisa (never know!), may I wish you a warm welcome back?


A bonus of revisiting this thread is it's made me realise of whom the newly arrived and strangely aggressive Hemingway is a reincarnation, I knew s/he must have been here before but couldn't quite put my finger on it! Some folk think they are too clever by half...

Hmmm, you came across a bit annoying but so do many, including me. But there again I was accused of having psychopathic tendencies many years ago not knowing what it really meant. I thought that it meant a murderer. Now having only recently found out what it means, and reflected, that may have applied to me at the time. I think that must be a thread in its own right!

Loutwo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Many thanks rendel. It is indeed me, I was unable

> to come back under my old screen name. Happy new

> year to you! Have I missed much? I?ve been

> checking in from time to time.

>

> Louisa.


Same to you Louisa! We've just been filling time until you returned to be honest - there's been some minor brouhaha about the EU, and one or two people seem to have become mildly exercised about where they park their motorcars, that's about it...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...