Offensive all night party

[JohnL]

"we have lived in the house for over 8 years and not had a party before"

Life begins at 40

[Earl Aelfheah]

Sounds eminently reasonable tbh.

[Countrlass22]

Ha abusive members. Nothing better do nit pick.

Your so hilarious

[rendelharris]

Curious, why did you say the party had been shut down by Southwark noise control when it hadn't?

[Robert Poste's Child]

Was there more than one party going on?

[amuiphoto]

Seriously, have you nothing better to talk about than a 40th birthday party that went on 'til 2am... FFS!

[Alan Medic]

amuiphoto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seriously, have you nothing better to talk about

> than a 40th birthday party that went on 'til

> 2am... FFS!

And you wrote about it...........

[Mick Mac]

Countrlass22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ha abusive members. Nothing better do nit pick.

>

> Your so hilarious

and you're a sado IMO... let the guy/girl have a bit of fun.

Calling the council at 12.10am.... i mean really. Maybe you should move to the burbs

[Robert Poste's Child]

This IS the burbs.

[Jules-and-Boo]

THAT would be depressing. It feels a bit like it sometimes.

BUT it is a city and there are people and people make noise and have parties and enjoy life.. and that's a good thing.

[JohnL]

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This IS the burbs.

I say inner suburbs

[Earl Aelfheah]

There is nothing wrong with having a party, but it's only polite to speak to your neighbours in advance (which it sounds like they did in this case).

East Dulwich is not the city, it is very much a suburban, residential area.

[NewWave]

Countrlass22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ha abusive members. Nothing better do nit pick.

>

> Your so hilarious

no you are! complaining about an 'all night party' at midnight.

get a life!

[Acp124]

Was the party at the Constitutional Hall?

[Jules-and-Boo]

ED is very much London - it's not the suburbs by far.

Sorry, but London rules tolerance.

[Robert Poste's Child]

To anyone living in central London, or even SE or SW low numbers south of the river, this is surely suburbs - zone 2/3 borders, reachable only by bus and overground, most of it built since 1900. Inner suburbs these days perhaps, but you couldn't call it inner city or urban.

[DaveR]

To anyone living in central London, or even SE or SW low numbers south of the river, this is surely suburbs - zone 2/3 borders, reachable only by bus and overground, most of it built since 1900. Inner suburbs these days perhaps, but you couldn't call it inner city or urban.

(Pedantry alert)

The number part of London postcodes does not indicate how central you are - it's alphabetical by postal area - so the rererence to 'low numbers' doesn't make sense. And most of ED was built before 1900, in the 1880s and 1890s.

That aside, I agree that inner suburbs is the best description - it fits the history, architecture and the general feel.

Re 'offensive all night party' - obviously not literally all night, but I'd be pretty hacked off about this:

"the last guests left about 2:15 when we switched off the music"

if it was my neighbour, whether they'd warned me or not.

[camberwell70]

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To anyone living in central London, or even SE or

> SW low numbers south of the river, this is surely

> suburbs - zone 2/3 borders, reachable only by bus

> and overground, most of it built since 1900. Inner

> suburbs these days perhaps, but you couldn't call

> it inner city or urban.

>

> (Pedantry alert)

>

> The number part of London postcodes does not

> indicate how central you are - it's alphabetical

> by postal area - so the rererence to 'low numbers'

> doesn't make sense. And most of ED was built

> before 1900, in the 1880s and 1890s.

>

> That aside, I agree that inner suburbs is the best

> description - it fits the history, architecture

> and the general feel.

>

> Re 'offensive all night party' - obviously not

> literally all night, but I'd be pretty hacked off

> about this:

>

> "the last guests left about 2:15 when we switched

> off the music"

>

> if it was my neighbour, whether they'd warned me

> or not.

True. Inner suburbs but not Inner London.

[Jim1234]

It's rude to stop someone from sleeping when they want to, it's also rude to stop others having fun.