Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Having recently moved from Colchester to Dulwich, I was pretty excited to move to an area nationally renown as a hub of road cycling. However, I have never come across such a bunch of unfriendly riders in my life. I don't know how many times I've said hello just to be ignored. What it is? Essex and Suffolk riders are friendly! Is it that hard to say hi or nod? Seriously, if you're one of then - get over yourself!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/19602-calling-all-road-cyclists/
Share on other sites

When I'm out and about Harry in Ed I always find fellow one legged people to be quite friendly even if they are strangers. Maybe the cyclists are concentrating on not being run down by cars and vans. When I'm driving (my automatic) I've never yet been able to get one and I've got a bunch of Marty Feldman's unused stickers stashed in my glove compartment.

I know the feeling - I quite often smile and nod at a fellow cyclist going the other way to absolutely no response.


And I used to try to strike up a conversation if I was waiting at the lights... but I've virtually given up. Lots of cyclists wear headphones these days so I guess that doesn't help.


Of course, if you're on a BSO in normal clothes then of course all the Rapha roadies will blank you...

Er....I think you'd have to be a reaaaaallllly stupid cyclist to wear headphones when you've got a far greater chance of injury if you're involved in an accident than any car driver listening to their stereo.


Unless, of course, your name is Wolverine and your bones are made of adamantine.

Where's the evidence of that? I can listen to headphones at a safe volume and cycle perfectly safely....done it for 20+ years without any accident that was my fault. A cyclist has a far greater chance of injury because they are on a cycle, that's all.

There is no evidence. The claim was made by the president of the AA but was later rescinded to that of any road user being distracted.


At the end of last year, the president of the motoring organisation the AA, Edmund King called for a campaign warning riders not to listen to iPods or personal stereos whilst they are cycling. His comments featured in the Times newspaper, alongside warnings that earphones were one of the factors behind a rise in the number of cyclists being injured on the roads, or colliding with (and injuring) pedestrians.


The AA later qualified these remarks made by its President as a more general attack on road users who don?t pay enough attention to what is going on around them. The distraction doesn?t necessarily have to be music through your headphones; crossing the road whilst wearing a hood was also mentioned as increasing your risk of being involved in an accident, as was using a mobile phone whilst driving ? something which has been illegal in the UK since December 2003.


Wearing headphones, listening to a car stereo or wearing a full face crash helmet (through which you can hear nothing) doesn't cause an accident. Poor attention to what is going on around you does.....

Now that the evenings are drawing in, please can I call on all road cyclists to wear lots of bright and reflective clothes, while we're at it? I usually travel around ED in a bus or a car, and it's scary how invisible dark-clad cyclists with only a small light are.

Harry, feel free to come along to our Sunday Cycle group - its FREE!


The main thread is on 'Whats on in ED', but in short we cover typically 30-miles on a Sunday morning, and once a month (like yesterday) we did 60-miles, with the option of taking a train back at certain locations. We wait at the top of hills for the rest of the team (as we take it at an easy pace), and once out of Croydon, we take to the lanes. Mountain Bikes & Road bikes - all ages, all abilities attend.


9-15am start on Sunday mornings, meeting at the Dulwich Tollgate / College Road..... the first 5-mins is up to Crystal Palace.


As a bit of fun yesterday, we decided to ride up Box Hill on the way back from Gatwick.


And I agree with Moos, lights and bright clothing even during the day during low light / drizzle or rain.





McC

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is no evidence. The claim was made by the

> president of the AA but was later rescinded to

> that of any road user being distracted.

>

> At the end of last year, the president of the

> motoring organisation the AA, Edmund King called

> for a campaign warning riders not to listen to

> iPods or personal stereos whilst they are cycling.

> His comments featured in the Times newspaper,

> alongside warnings that earphones were one of the

> factors behind a rise in the number of cyclists

> being injured on the roads, or colliding with (and

> injuring) pedestrians.

>

> The AA later qualified these remarks made by its

> President as a more general attack on road users

> who don?t pay enough attention to what is going on

> around them. The distraction doesn?t necessarily

> have to be music through your headphones; crossing

> the road whilst wearing a hood was also mentioned

> as increasing your risk of being involved in an

> accident, as was using a mobile phone whilst

> driving ? something which has been illegal in the

> UK since December 2003.

>

> Wearing headphones, listening to a car stereo or

> wearing a full face crash helmet (through which

> you can hear nothing) doesn't cause an accident.

> Poor attention to what is going on around you

> does.....


Yes, poor attention does cause accidents. But at the end of the day, wearing headphones and listening to music potentially deprives you of one of your senses on the road and may impact on your concentration. The fact that a full face crash helmet impairs hearing is nothing to the point - you need to stack the deck in your favour when cycling and it's not as if motorcycling is a low risk pursuit.


Whilst it's a matter of personal choice, I wouldn't do it - cycling is already dangerous enough.

i cycle every day and wouldn't dream of wearing headphones.


In a car you have mirrors to help with spatial awareness- on a bike you have to rely on a quick turn of the head or your ears to see/hear any vehicles (especially motorcycles) approaching from the rear.


I wouldn't feel safe at all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That a shocking story.  Spurs?  You appear to be lost.  Haringey is very much the other side of the river.  
    • Every year they ask for more and every year it is an exhausting process pushing back on that for local residents and councillors. What annoys me is that at the post event consultation/ feedback this year, I specifically asked them if the rumours around applying for two weekends next year were true. They told me no. So that was a lie. Anyway, we go again. 
    • Double In New or great condition  Or super comfortable air bed Any1 pls
    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...