Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Having recently moved from Colchester to Dulwich, I was pretty excited to move to an area nationally renown as a hub of road cycling. However, I have never come across such a bunch of unfriendly riders in my life. I don't know how many times I've said hello just to be ignored. What it is? Essex and Suffolk riders are friendly! Is it that hard to say hi or nod? Seriously, if you're one of then - get over yourself!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/19602-calling-all-road-cyclists/
Share on other sites

When I'm out and about Harry in Ed I always find fellow one legged people to be quite friendly even if they are strangers. Maybe the cyclists are concentrating on not being run down by cars and vans. When I'm driving (my automatic) I've never yet been able to get one and I've got a bunch of Marty Feldman's unused stickers stashed in my glove compartment.

I know the feeling - I quite often smile and nod at a fellow cyclist going the other way to absolutely no response.


And I used to try to strike up a conversation if I was waiting at the lights... but I've virtually given up. Lots of cyclists wear headphones these days so I guess that doesn't help.


Of course, if you're on a BSO in normal clothes then of course all the Rapha roadies will blank you...

Er....I think you'd have to be a reaaaaallllly stupid cyclist to wear headphones when you've got a far greater chance of injury if you're involved in an accident than any car driver listening to their stereo.


Unless, of course, your name is Wolverine and your bones are made of adamantine.

Where's the evidence of that? I can listen to headphones at a safe volume and cycle perfectly safely....done it for 20+ years without any accident that was my fault. A cyclist has a far greater chance of injury because they are on a cycle, that's all.

There is no evidence. The claim was made by the president of the AA but was later rescinded to that of any road user being distracted.


At the end of last year, the president of the motoring organisation the AA, Edmund King called for a campaign warning riders not to listen to iPods or personal stereos whilst they are cycling. His comments featured in the Times newspaper, alongside warnings that earphones were one of the factors behind a rise in the number of cyclists being injured on the roads, or colliding with (and injuring) pedestrians.


The AA later qualified these remarks made by its President as a more general attack on road users who don?t pay enough attention to what is going on around them. The distraction doesn?t necessarily have to be music through your headphones; crossing the road whilst wearing a hood was also mentioned as increasing your risk of being involved in an accident, as was using a mobile phone whilst driving ? something which has been illegal in the UK since December 2003.


Wearing headphones, listening to a car stereo or wearing a full face crash helmet (through which you can hear nothing) doesn't cause an accident. Poor attention to what is going on around you does.....

Now that the evenings are drawing in, please can I call on all road cyclists to wear lots of bright and reflective clothes, while we're at it? I usually travel around ED in a bus or a car, and it's scary how invisible dark-clad cyclists with only a small light are.

Harry, feel free to come along to our Sunday Cycle group - its FREE!


The main thread is on 'Whats on in ED', but in short we cover typically 30-miles on a Sunday morning, and once a month (like yesterday) we did 60-miles, with the option of taking a train back at certain locations. We wait at the top of hills for the rest of the team (as we take it at an easy pace), and once out of Croydon, we take to the lanes. Mountain Bikes & Road bikes - all ages, all abilities attend.


9-15am start on Sunday mornings, meeting at the Dulwich Tollgate / College Road..... the first 5-mins is up to Crystal Palace.


As a bit of fun yesterday, we decided to ride up Box Hill on the way back from Gatwick.


And I agree with Moos, lights and bright clothing even during the day during low light / drizzle or rain.





McC

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is no evidence. The claim was made by the

> president of the AA but was later rescinded to

> that of any road user being distracted.

>

> At the end of last year, the president of the

> motoring organisation the AA, Edmund King called

> for a campaign warning riders not to listen to

> iPods or personal stereos whilst they are cycling.

> His comments featured in the Times newspaper,

> alongside warnings that earphones were one of the

> factors behind a rise in the number of cyclists

> being injured on the roads, or colliding with (and

> injuring) pedestrians.

>

> The AA later qualified these remarks made by its

> President as a more general attack on road users

> who don?t pay enough attention to what is going on

> around them. The distraction doesn?t necessarily

> have to be music through your headphones; crossing

> the road whilst wearing a hood was also mentioned

> as increasing your risk of being involved in an

> accident, as was using a mobile phone whilst

> driving ? something which has been illegal in the

> UK since December 2003.

>

> Wearing headphones, listening to a car stereo or

> wearing a full face crash helmet (through which

> you can hear nothing) doesn't cause an accident.

> Poor attention to what is going on around you

> does.....


Yes, poor attention does cause accidents. But at the end of the day, wearing headphones and listening to music potentially deprives you of one of your senses on the road and may impact on your concentration. The fact that a full face crash helmet impairs hearing is nothing to the point - you need to stack the deck in your favour when cycling and it's not as if motorcycling is a low risk pursuit.


Whilst it's a matter of personal choice, I wouldn't do it - cycling is already dangerous enough.

i cycle every day and wouldn't dream of wearing headphones.


In a car you have mirrors to help with spatial awareness- on a bike you have to rely on a quick turn of the head or your ears to see/hear any vehicles (especially motorcycles) approaching from the rear.


I wouldn't feel safe at all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...