Jump to content

Recommended Posts

petercain0110 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Times move on .. Maybe the Victorians lamented the

> passing of straw huts .. Maybe the Victorians

> would envy the new builds .. I live in a 1902

> building .. I like it .. Never-the-less, a new

> build is undoubtedly better ..



Unless it's this one!

chazzle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For the latest impact (the fifth) the lorry turned

> in at speed and drive about one metre onto the

> pavement. Just bad driving. A bollard should help.



Bad driving! No consolation if you're a member of library staff, a shopper or a pedestrian at that moment!

  • 4 weeks later...

Children going to the library, cars parked up on his work area, vehicles cutting the corner, single lane traffic up to the builders yard. More pedestrian safe space needed as people cannot look.


Before this development there was plenty of room for all.


I hope they do not find reasons to close it.

I tend to agree on your statement quote 'They look quite smart, but don't be fooled!' ....


Modern , a snazzy/trendy way of saying cheap and quick to grab-in the idiotic/foolish young yuppies .


It seems we are 'assimilating' Turkish building designs and standards ....


... new home buyers are doomed !


I agree with some other folk on here saying that proper bricks , really do make our houses homely and inject a certain interesting character :-)

Why would real bricks be better here? They'd be more expensive to repair and will be less thermally efficient than modern construction methods.


My principal complaints about those flats are:

1. No effort to colour match the brick tiles to the attached station building

2. Building a balcony without accompanying protection on the pavement to stop trucks cutting the corner

Alex_b ,


I will keep this short , but I do want to reply before I got to work and forget :-)


BOTH your points are SPOT ON and accurate , but as for the REAL BRICK houses being 'inefficient' well , honestly that is a 'half truth' in my opinion .


Yes , I will agree that modern building designs are 'better' [ noticeable - but not by much - just MY opinion] in keeping noise down (sound-proofing) , insulation (energy efficiency) ....


.... However , I used to live in these old houses , ( and I love it ! ) I know they get damp , mouldy and filled with wood lice etc , but if your tech-savvy and with a good combination of knowing YOUR HISTORY , you can avoid massive heating bills , expensive building repairs and aggravation from your neighbours over noise (except dinner parties !) .


All I can say is , please dont ruin (disapprove) good old stuff for us , there are adults - like myself , kids grown up from the 90's that actually remember what it was like in ED in the old houses , before they 'absorbed' by the rich and affluent . :-)


Anyway that is enough for me on this topic , and I am the kind of guy that could go on for many days , but I am out !


P.S. Southwark Council have lost the plot , and it seems to me they dramatically have lost their 'foresight' intelligence when approving/disapproving building applications ....

...Are they taking bribes ? You never know - maybe .

Just to clarify I'm not against old houses, I grew up in a Victorian house and live in a Victorian house now. Of course they can be improved and you can make them much more thermally efficient.


What I was saying is that if you are building new buildings now, using "real brick" in place of more modern construction methods isn't sensible either from an environmental or cost point of view.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...